Fire Patrick Graham

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RenoRaiders75
Posts: 1,375
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:36 am
Received High Fives: 19 times

Fire Patrick Graham

Unread post by RenoRaiders75 »

We have a fire Chip Kelly thread, why not fire PG? Our D sucks. We couldn't even stop them in the second half. Players are getting burnt. He hasn't really devolped anyone, we have zero pressure except for Maxx and he is being trippled teamed. Anyone else ready to move on?
These users gave a High Five to the author RenoRaiders75 for the post (total 2):
The Real CK, FlyBono24
User avatar
WolfRaider
Posts: 4,784
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:46 am
Has given High Fives: 18 times
Received High Fives: 105 times

Unread post by WolfRaider »

Let’s fire the DC who’s got a defence with zero talent outside of one player yet isn’t the worst defence in the league.

Blame the talent not PG
These users gave a High Five to the author WolfRaider for the post (total 2):
ELCAraiderfan, Curay7680
User avatar
DeathStar24
Posts: 1,108
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
Location: PA
Has given High Fives: 58 times
Received High Fives: 184 times

Unread post by DeathStar24 »

Defense was good but let's not act like Broncos didn't call a shit game too. Broncos beat themselves more than the Raiders and they still lost. I'm still more than ok with moving on from Graham.
These users gave a High Five to the author DeathStar24 for the post (total 2):
The Real CK, mranquales
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,102
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1185 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

When your opponent continues to make mistakes, let them. The problem was that Denver let us make more.
User avatar
The Real CK
Fernando
Posts: 17,301
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
Has given High Fives: 481 times
Received High Fives: 199 times

Unread post by The Real CK »

DeathStar24 wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 4:15 am Defense was good but let's not act like Broncos didn't call a shit game too. Broncos beat themselves more than the Raiders and they still lost. I'm still more than ok with moving on from Graham.
I wonder if Payton left a contest winner call plays. It was spastic.
User avatar
DeathStar24
Posts: 1,108
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
Location: PA
Has given High Fives: 58 times
Received High Fives: 184 times

Unread post by DeathStar24 »

The Real CK wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 4:36 am I wonder if Payton left a contest winner call plays. It was spastic.
I was dumbfounded at how bad they looked. That one call on 3rd and whatever where they ran that weird reverse with Sutton where he tried to pass was the dumbest of the dumb.
These users gave a High Five to the author DeathStar24 for the post:
The Real CK
User avatar
The Real CK
Fernando
Posts: 17,301
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
Has given High Fives: 481 times
Received High Fives: 199 times

Unread post by The Real CK »

DeathStar24 wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 5:16 am I was dumbfounded at how bad they looked. That one call on 3rd and whatever where they ran that weird reverse with Sutton where he tried to pass was the dumbest of the dumb.
All they needed was one yard for a first run and the result took them out of field goal range.

It felt like they were trying to throw the game. :loltears:
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,622
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1221 times
Received High Fives: 2950 times

Unread post by Attyla »

DeathStar24 wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 5:16 am I was dumbfounded at how bad they looked. That one call on 3rd and whatever where they ran that weird reverse with Sutton where he tried to pass was the dumbest of the dumb.
That play really stood out as a head scratcher
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,681
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 454 times

Unread post by heavyD »

The Real CK wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 5:21 am All they needed was one yard for a first run and the result took them out of field goal range.

It felt like they were trying to throw the game. :loltears:
I think he was trying to get cute like the Chiefs do against the Raiders but their offense isn't nearly as efficient. When you are as bad as the Raiders, the opposition can take things for granted that you still need to execute even against the worst team in the league.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,636
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 884 times
Received High Fives: 277 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Raiders gave up a 2nd and 18. Fire Graham.
These users gave a High Five to the author mranquales for the post (total 3):
DeathStar24, The Real CK, rich72
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,622
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1221 times
Received High Fives: 2950 times

Unread post by Attyla »

yes, professional teams fire one of their top coaches over one play. That is how it works
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

I've been critical of Graham but the defense played well enough to win last night. That being said, I'd need to see that on a more consistent basis before annointing Graham as our long term D coordinator.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,727
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1159 times
Received High Fives: 593 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

tadow wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 7:57 pm Wouldn't mind trying to pry Tyson Bagent away from the Bears
Dude.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,679
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 41 times
Received High Fives: 1416 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Its more that the defense isnt very good but its by far the best of our three phases. It looks like super bowl level compared to our offense and special teams.
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,328
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 296 times
Received High Fives: 829 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

Defense did well. No major issues. Some very good plays made. One specific was a wr screen to the offenses right. DB engaged with a blocker and he reached out and prevented the first down. Few others similar. The young DBs seem to be doing well and learning.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,636
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 884 times
Received High Fives: 277 times

Unread post by mranquales »

DanKD wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 8:40 am Its more that the defense isnt very good but its by far the best of our three phases. It looks like super bowl level compared to our offense and special teams.
That's false. Whenever the defense needs to make a stop, they don't. The other things you see are an illusion because the OP offense is playing down to the Raiders level.

Raiders had the lead against the Bears, the Bears marched down the field and scored easily.

Raiders had the lead against the Jaguars, the Jags marched down the field and scored easily.

If the defense is any good, then stop the offense when it matters. Not on the first couple of drives.
Post Reply