He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,608
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 158 times
Received High Fives: 763 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,751
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 230 times
Received High Fives: 507 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

16 to 88 wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:40 pm What you have to do is tantalize a team like the Seahawks or the 49ers and the teams in those very competitive divisions won't want to have him terrorizing there QB's...
Their picks are too low.
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,204
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 431 times
Received High Fives: 305 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:37 pm I never understood why the Bengals weren't interested to begin with. They need someone like Maxx. With their #10 overall I personally wouldnt require another 1st. A 2nd would be fine by me.
Actually you are correct good sir! Top 10 pick and a 2nd next year by them would get it done. That sticks him in the ravens division and now they can eat it...
These users gave a High Five to the author 16 to 88 for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
riseNraid09
Posts: 1,573
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2023 7:46 pm
Location: The Ville, Ky (BIG BLUE NATION)
Has given High Fives: 166 times
Received High Fives: 212 times

Unread post by riseNraid09 »

I like the idea of trading him to Cincinnati. As much as it would be desired, I don't think two firsts is required either.

Trade him for the #10, #41, and what... like a 2nd or 3rd in the '27 draft? the value is relatively close to the previous trade at that point.
These users gave a High Five to the author riseNraid09 for the post (total 3):
16 to 88, Cruisin with Tooz, Raiders Baby
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,204
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 431 times
Received High Fives: 305 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:41 pm Their picks are too low.
Rams hold pick 13.

If not you could possibly have a player kicked in for a team lower in the draft?
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,204
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 431 times
Received High Fives: 305 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

riseNraid09 wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:45 pm I like the idea of trading him to Cincinnati. As much as it would be desired, I don't think two firsts is required either.

Trade him for the #10, #41, and what... like a 2nd or 3rd in the '27 draft? the value is relatively close to the previous trade at that point.
I like it!
These users gave a High Five to the author 16 to 88 for the post:
riseNraid09
User avatar
rich_120
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 9:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 52 times
Received High Fives: 47 times

Unread post by rich_120 »

FB_IMG_1773200866006.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
These users gave a High Five to the author rich_120 for the post (total 4):
SkullCrusher, Oaktownonly, raider_kin, Dr Death
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,871
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 410 times
Received High Fives: 795 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

What’s Bengals cap situation? They’re paying 2 WRs close to $55.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,721
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 42 times
Received High Fives: 1443 times

Unread post by DanKD »

I just dont think we would get equal value to the Ravens offer.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 2):
Jeevo, rich72
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,469
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 342 times
Received High Fives: 864 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

User avatar
626Raiderfan
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:08 pm

Unread post by 626Raiderfan »

DanKD wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:54 pm I just dont think we would get equal value to the Ravens offer.

Unfortunately at this point Raiders won’t get equal values for Max from any team thanks to Ravens. Next best thing is get 80% of the Ravens offer from another team, preferably a team in their same division.
User avatar
raiderboyron
Posts: 1,233
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:44 am
Location: On the side of Lassen peak in beautiful Shasta Co
Has given High Fives: 357 times
Received High Fives: 182 times

Unread post by raiderboyron »

Guy was knowing all along what was going down and was still at the facility every day. Front office knew too. Don't think anyone's butthurt on either side.
Welcome back Maxx!
These users gave a High Five to the author raiderboyron for the post (total 5):
Jeevo, ALLRAIDERWORLD21, Steve007, Opoponax50, Dr Death
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,871
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 410 times
Received High Fives: 795 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

DanKD wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:54 pm I just dont think we would get equal value to the Ravens offer.
It does seem like we lost the best deal out there.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,025
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 489 times
Received High Fives: 629 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

raiderboyron wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:56 pm Guy was knowing all along what was going down and was still at the facility every day. Front office knew too. Don't think anyone's butthurt on either side.
Welcome back Maxx!
Right, we all say it, do we believe it? It's business.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post (total 2):
raiderboyron, Dr Death
User avatar
FlyBono24
Posts: 6,067
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:49 pm
Has given High Fives: 590 times
Received High Fives: 137 times

Unread post by FlyBono24 »

Dokie85 wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:49 pm Am I crazy to think maybe this could be a blessing? Sure, it stinks to lose the value of two extra first round picks, but we and many other teams have a history of swinging and missing on picks. Crosby is a known great player, even if he's a bit overrated by our fan base. From what I've read, we have the cap space to keep Crosby in the fold. He'll play hard no matter what. Sure, we have other glaring needs, but maybe this will make for great make up sex between Crosby and the Raiders?
Seems like people on here forgot when they traded Mack because the front office thought they would do better with more draft picks, and they had SHIT for a pass rush for years after, saying "good pass rushers are hard to find" :rolleyes:

Even at #14 overall, they still wouldn't find a DE as good as Maxx. In fact this year there aren't any really "elite" pass rushers at all that will be available past the 8 or 9 spot.
These users gave a High Five to the author FlyBono24 for the post (total 3):
rcraider, Steve007, Dokie85
User avatar
626Raiderfan
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:08 pm

Unread post by 626Raiderfan »

FlyBono24 wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:59 pm Seems like people on here forgot when they traded Mack because the front office thought they would do better with more draft picks, and they had SHIT for a pass rush for years after, saying "good pass rushers are hard to find" :rolleyes:

Even at #14 overall, they still wouldn't find a DE as good as Maxx. In fact this year there aren't any really "elite" pass rushers at all that will be available past the 8 or 9 spot.
Keeping Max at his current contract means raiders are going to lose some of the free agents they had verbally agreed to sign. This team has so many holes, yesterdays haul was exactly what this team needed, not some near 30 year old DE with injury history and huge salary.
Post Reply