Raiders Re-Sign CB Eric Stokes

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
JRaider17
The JudgeFernando
Posts: 12,850
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 298 times

Raiders Re-Sign CB Eric Stokes

Unread post by JRaider17 »

These users gave a High Five to the author JRaider17 for the post:
chucker
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,806
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 808 times
Received High Fives: 966 times

Unread post by Viper »

Sold My Soul wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 8:22 am CB Eric Stokes returns to Raiders on 3-year deal

Top 150 ranking: 45
Reported deal: 3 years, $30 million
Grade: A

A year after having to settle for a one-year deal with Las Vegas, Stokes gets rewarded by the Raiders to the tune of a three-year deal with $20 million in guaranteed money. Stokes will play for a new defensive coordinator this season as Patrick Graham departed for the Steelers, and run game coordinator Rob Leonard received a promotion to DC. But the 2021 first-round pick will still use his length and athleticism to his advantage. — Jones
Glad he’s remaining a Raider
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post (total 2):
chucker, raiderboyron
User avatar
raiderboyron
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:44 am
Location: On the side of Lassen peak in beautiful Shasta Co
Has given High Fives: 362 times
Received High Fives: 183 times

Unread post by raiderboyron »

I'm "Stoked" about this. :happy:
These users gave a High Five to the author raiderboyron for the post:
chucker
User avatar
JRaider17
The JudgeFernando
Posts: 12,850
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 298 times

Unread post by JRaider17 »

These users gave a High Five to the author JRaider17 for the post:
chucker
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,074
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2100 times
Received High Fives: 2811 times

Unread post by chucker »

It's interesting that they added void years for Stokes, and not for any other player. It doesn't make much difference upfront because it's such a small signing bonus, but it makes the contract more attractive for a restructure this year or next because you can spread out the cap hit further without going back to the player for approval. It shows a real comfort level for Stokes as a player and person.
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,365
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2706 times
Received High Fives: 1187 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

chucker wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 7:26 am It's interesting that they added void years for Stokes, and not for any other player. It doesn't make much difference upfront because it's such a small signing bonus, but it makes the contract more attractive for a restructure this year or next because you can spread out the cap hit further without going back to the player for approval. It shows a real comfort level for Stokes as a player and person.
What are void years? (ignorant, I know)
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,074
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2100 times
Received High Fives: 2811 times

Unread post by chucker »

raider_kin wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 7:29 am What are void years? (ignorant, I know)
It's a 3 year contract with two void years. Void years are like dummy years that don't exist - you would have to agree with him on an extension for those years or the contract expires after 3 years. They are used so that the team can spread the cap hit of a signing bonus over a longer term than the effective length of the contract. Stokes' signing bonus will be spread over 5 years so there will be dead money after the third year - unless he has signed an extension before it expires.

It's a mechanism to help add more cap space in the near term, at the cost of future cap space. It's ok to use it some, but overdoing it can get teams into trouble. We aren't using it enough to be a risk.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,806
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 808 times
Received High Fives: 966 times

Unread post by Viper »

raider_kin wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 7:29 am What are void years? (ignorant, I know)
Don’t feel bad, I had to read his explanation 3 times for it to make sense to me.
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post (total 3):
chucker, raider_kin, RickRyb
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,074
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2100 times
Received High Fives: 2811 times

Unread post by chucker »

Viper wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 7:53 am Don’t feel bad, I had to read his explanation 3 times for it to make sense to me.
I'm a finance guy..... so my brain works different. I don't expect most people to be that interested in the cap details, and that's why I keep saying "don't worry about the cap". Ultimately the best way to manage the cap is to find good players (in the draft and in FA) and what you pay them is less important as long as they perform. It's about football, not some hocus pocus cap accounting.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Viper
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,365
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2706 times
Received High Fives: 1187 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Viper wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 7:53 am Don’t feel bad, I had to read his explanation 3 times for it to make sense to me.
I read it twice before it sunk in :grimmace:
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,683
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 41 times
Received High Fives: 1419 times

Unread post by DanKD »

I think its possible they adjusted the structure after Maxx' deal fell through
Post Reply