Should the NFL adopt the UFL's 4-point field goal rule?

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,806
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1936 times
Received High Fives: 1194 times

Should the NFL adopt the UFL's 4-point field goal rule?

Unread post by Rabidraider »

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/493 ... don-aubrey

ACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- Should the NFL consider making field goals of 60 or more yards worth four points?

While there's currently no momentum or proposal by the NFL competition committee, some current players and Pro Football Hall of Famers are at least intrigued (with mixed opinions) by the idea of awarding an additional point for converting on a distance that isn't all that rare anymore.

Two seasons ago, the NFL revamped its kickoff rules in hopes of reducing injuries and encouraging more returns when it implemented a dynamic kickoff structure that had been used in the XFL, a spring football league now known as the UFL.

The changes worked. The return rate in the NFL increased from 21.8% in 2023 to 32.8% in 2024. Further tweaks to league rules in 2025 resulted in the rate jumping to 74.5% in 2025.

This year, the UFL implemented the four-point field goal and saw an uptick in 60-yard field goals. During the UFL's 2025 season, no 60-yard field goals were made. But in 2026, the league went 8-for-14 (57.1%) on such kicks, including going 4-for-4 in the playoffs.

Last season in the NFL, kickers attempted a record 22 field goals of 60 or more yards and made 12 (55%). That's nearly as many successful field goals from 60-plus yards last season were nearly as many as kickers made in the previous three seasons (14).

click link for more...
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,763
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 370 times
Received High Fives: 854 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

No...it just adds to the ways we can lose lol
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 3):
Dr Death, heavyD, Raiders Baby
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 928 times
Received High Fives: 2149 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Absolutely not.
User avatar
The Real CK
Fernando
Posts: 17,301
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 201 times

Unread post by The Real CK »

Huge UFL fan.

But no. That kind of gimmick only works for spring football.
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,806
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 808 times
Received High Fives: 966 times

Unread post by Viper »

60 seems too common nowadays, if it were to be considered, I’d say minimum 65.

Still, I’d pass on the idea.
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Absolutely not, FGs (made and missed) already have enough influence on the game's outcome as it is.
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,608
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 161 times
Received High Fives: 780 times
Contact:

Unread post by Corleone »

I'd rather find a way to eliminate kicking all together tbh. Definitely punting, but not a fan of any kicking, and while we're at it, change the name to something that represents the sport better than the name "football", I propose "handegg".
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,442
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 871 times
Received High Fives: 1712 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

I propose that for every new rule the NFL must eliminate 10 existing rules
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post (total 4):
Dr Death, mstrbass2000, Goodtimes333, Rainman56
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,018
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 486 times
Received High Fives: 625 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Would there be such things as 57, 58 and 59 yards fg's?
Or would the placeholder always line up at the 50 and the snappper snaps it an extra yard or so?
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,295
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4257 times
Received High Fives: 1113 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

I'm a NO vote on this one.
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
Rainman56
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,229
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 794 times
Received High Fives: 1043 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

hell no ...we dont have a kicker that can kick over 60 yds currently
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1216 times
Received High Fives: 2922 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Canada has tree parts on their money so no
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,155
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 990 times
Received High Fives: 604 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

No. Even if we had a strong leg kicker. We have 2 weak kickers fighting it out as it is
User avatar
ELCAraiderfan
GhostMad StorkBig Ben
Posts: 3,350
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 845 times
Received High Fives: 410 times

Unread post by ELCAraiderfan »

Corleone wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 9:40 am I'd rather find a way to eliminate kicking all together tbh. Definitely punting, but not a fan of any kicking, and while we're at it, change the name to something that represents the sport better than the name "football", I propose "handegg".
How about "pigskinball"?
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,351
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2705 times
Received High Fives: 1183 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

ELCAraiderfan wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 8:12 pm How about "pigskinball"?
Calvinball if they keep changing the rules.
Post Reply