Vita Vea Requests a Trade
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2026 4:05 pm
Should we pursue him?
What’s his trade value?
What’s his trade value?
RaiderStation is the ultimate Las Vegas Raiders fan forum — join Raider Nation for bold takes, game-day analysis, news, rumors, and Silver & Black pride. Connect with fellow fans and be part of the discussion.
https://raiderstation.com/
Yeah, and CA income tax is no joke, especially for rich people. And the way its looking they are trying to pass more money grab tax laws so lots of rich people are fleeing the state.SuperRaider wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 1:54 pm I think they have to pay state income tax on where they play their game….so they collect 17 paycheck a season but if the game is played in a state that has state taxes; then they have to pay the taxes also….
I could be wrong; but I am pretty sure that how their paycheck are work out….
So even the raider players have to pay state income tax; not the home games but on the road games they do…
Jock Tax Guide: How States Tax Athletes State by State
Tax Planning
Jock Tax Guide: How States Tax Athletes State by State
Published: April 23, 2026
If you’re a professional athlete, the phrase “jock tax” shows up fast once you start earning real money. And it doesn’t just apply to superstars on nine-figure contracts. Minor leaguers, college athletes earning NIL income, and even amateur competitors who cross state lines for paid events can owe taxes in states where they’ve never set foot for more than a few days.
The mechanics aren’t complicated once you understand the framework. States have the right to tax income earned within their borders. When an athlete plays a game in California, California taxes that slice of their salary. They don’t need to live there. They don’t need a bank account there. The game itself is enough.
Here’s what that means in practice: a Dallas Cowboys player who earns $5 million this season files a federal return plus returns in every state where they played an away game. That can be 10 to 15 separate state filings in a single year, each requiring its own calculation, credit, and payment. This guide explains how that system works, which states participate, and why Texas-based athletes still need multi-state tax planning even without a state income tax at home.
What is the jock tax?
The jock tax is the obligation for professional and amateur athletes (and other nonresident workers) to pay income tax in each state where they earn money, not just their home state. When an athlete plays a game, attends a required practice, or participates in a team event in a state where they don’t live, that state taxes the portion of their income attributable to days spent there. Forty-one states currently impose some form of this tax. The allocation formula divides the athlete’s total compensation by total duty days, then multiplies by the days spent in that state.
Key Takeaways
Forty-one states impose jock tax. Athletes owe state income tax in each one where they earn income, not just their home state.
Duty-day allocation determines how much. States divide compensation by total annual work days, then tax only the portion tied to days spent in their state.
Away games trigger the obligation. A single road game in New York or California is enough to create a filing requirement in that state.
Texas-based athletes save on home games. Texas has no state income tax, so income tied to home games isn’t taxed at the state level, giving Dallas teams a genuine recruiting edge.
Credits prevent full double taxation. Most states allow a credit for taxes paid to other states on the same income, but you have to claim it correctly or you pay twice.
Multi-state filing is non-negotiable. Missing even one state return can trigger penalties, interest, and audit risk that far exceeds the original tax owed.
What Is the Jock Tax?
How the Jock Tax Started
The jock tax traces back to 1991, when California decided to tax the Chicago Bulls after they beat the Los Angeles Lakers in the NBA Finals. Michael Jordan and his teammates had earned income in California during the series, and California saw no reason to let that income leave the state untaxed. The move was controversial enough that Illinois retaliated by taxing California athletes who played games in Chicago.
The name “jock tax” stuck, but the concept has roots in basic state tax law that predates basketball entirely. States have always had the authority to tax income earned within their borders by nonresidents. What changed in 1991 was aggressive enforcement against athletes specifically, partly because their income is large, their schedules are public, and their location is never in question.
By the mid-1990s, most states with income taxes had adopted some version of the rule. Today it applies to NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL, MLS, and PGA players, plus college athletes receiving NIL compensation, entertainers, actors filming on location, and some business executives who work across state lines.
Who the Jock Tax Applies To
The jock tax applies to any nonresident who earns income in a state. For athletes, this means every player on a visiting team. For college athletes, it means any NIL deal that requires them to appear or perform in a state where they don’t live. For coaches and team staff, many states extend the same obligation to anyone on the team payroll who travels with the team.
The threshold for triggering a filing requirement varies by state. Some states require a return if you earn even one dollar there. Others have de minimis thresholds ranging from $1,000 to $5,000. A few states, like California, are aggressive about enforcement and have minimal de minimis protections for high earners.
Why Athletes Can’t Avoid It
States collect jock taxes through withholding at the source. When a visiting team plays in California, the California Franchise Tax Board expects the employer (the visiting team or league) to withhold California tax from each player’s paycheck for California-sourced income. The withholding happens automatically, before the player ever sees the money.
This makes avoidance nearly impossible through standard means. The team handles withholding, and the player still has to file to reconcile the correct amount. Filing the return also lets the player claim credits on their home-state return and potentially recover money if too much was withheld.
How Duty-Day Allocation Works
The Duty-Day Formula Explained
Every state that imposes jock tax uses some version of a duty-day allocation formula to determine what percentage of an athlete’s total compensation is taxable in that state:
State taxable income = (duty days in state ÷ total duty days) × total compensation
The formula sounds straightforward. The complexity comes in defining what counts as a duty day, how states define “total duty days,” and what gets included in “total compensation.”
Some states count only games played. Others count all mandatory team activities: practices, film sessions, training camp, preseason games, team meetings. A few states include travel days if the travel is for a required team event. California, for example, counts preseason games, regular season games, postseason games, and all practices held in California.
Total compensation typically includes base salary, signing bonuses (sometimes pro-rated), roster bonuses, and performance bonuses. Deferred compensation is handled differently by state and can create tax obligations that don’t come due until years after the athlete stops playing.
What Counts as a Duty Day
Duty days vary by state, but the common categories are:
Games: any game played in that state, home or away
Practices: mandatory team practices held in that state
Training camp: preseason training if conducted in the state
Team meetings: mandatory meetings that occur in the state (some states include virtual meetings if the player is physically in the state)
Promotional appearances: appearances required by team contract that take place in the state
Preseason and postseason: most states count these the same as regular season
Days off, voluntary workouts, and personal travel generally don’t count. The athlete’s own off-season activities (personal training, endorsement shoots, etc.) may be taxed differently under a separate allocation method.
Worked Example: NFL Player in 8 States
Assume an NFL linebacker earning $5 million in total compensation. His team plays 17 regular season games plus 4 preseason games. He attends 180 total duty days (including practices and team activities) across the full year.
His team plays away games in these states: California (1 game), New York (1 game), Pennsylvania (1 game), Georgia (1 game), Ohio (1 game), Colorado (1 game), Missouri (1 game), Tennessee (1 game).
Assume each away game represents 3 duty days (travel, game, day after). That’s 24 duty days in away-game states.
State Duty Days in State Allocation Tax Owed (approx.)
California 3 3/180 = 1.67% $83,500 × 13.3% = ~$11,100
New York 3 1.67% $83,500 × 10.9% = ~$9,100
Pennsylvania 3 1.67% $83,500 × 3.07% = ~$2,600
Georgia 3 1.67% $83,500 × 5.75% = ~$4,800
Ohio 3 1.67% $83,500 × 3.99% = ~$3,300
Colorado 3 1.67% $83,500 × 4.4% = ~$3,700
Missouri 3 1.67% $83,500 × 4.95% = ~$4,100
Tennessee 3 1.67% $83,500 × 0% = $0
Total state tax across away games: roughly $38,700 in this simplified example. The home-state allocation (Texas, in this case) would be taxed at 0% since Texas has no income tax. Across an entire career, these numbers compound substantially.
In practice, most athletes we work with are surprised that the allocation isn’t just about games. States like California also count every practice held at the opponent’s facility during game week. That can turn a “one game in California” into 3-4 California duty days, and it changes the math significantly.
Which States Impose the Jock Tax
States With Jock Tax (Full List)
Forty-one states (plus Washington D.C.) impose income tax on nonresident athletes. The following table shows states that actively enforce jock tax obligations, with their top marginal rates. Rates shown are 2026 rates; multi-state filers should confirm current-year rates with their tax preparer.
State Top Rate Allocation Method
Alabama 5.0% Duty days
Arizona 2.5% Duty days
Arkansas 4.4% Duty days
California 13.3% Duty days (most aggressive enforcement)
Colorado 4.4% Duty days
Connecticut 6.99% Duty days
Delaware 6.6% Duty days
Georgia 5.75% Duty days
Hawaii 11.0% Duty days
Idaho 5.8% Duty days
Illinois 4.95% (flat) Games played
Indiana 3.05% (flat) Duty days
Iowa 5.7% Duty days
Kansas 5.7% Duty days
Kentucky 4.0% Duty days
Louisiana 3.0% Duty days
Maine 7.15% Duty days
Maryland 5.75% Duty days
Massachusetts 5.0% Duty days
Michigan 4.05% Duty days
Minnesota 9.85% Duty days
Mississippi 4.7% Duty days
Missouri 4.95% Duty days
Montana 5.9% Duty days
Nebraska 5.84% Duty days
New Jersey 10.75% Duty days
New Mexico 5.9% Duty days
New York 10.9% Duty days
North Carolina 4.5% Duty days
North Dakota 2.5% Duty days
Ohio 3.99% Duty days or games played
Oklahoma 4.75% Duty days
Oregon 9.9% Duty days
Pennsylvania 3.07% (flat) Games played
Rhode Island 5.99% Duty days
South Carolina 6.4% Duty days
Utah 4.65% (flat) Duty days
Vermont 8.75% Duty days
Virginia 5.75% Duty days
West Virginia 5.12% Duty days
Wisconsin 7.65% Duty days
D.C. 10.75% Duty days
California, New York, New Jersey, Minnesota, and Hawaii have the highest combined burdens for high-earning athletes. These states also tend to be most aggressive in enforcement and audit.
States With No Income Tax
Nine states impose no broad income tax, making them favorable for home-state purposes:
Florida: No state income tax. Home to the Miami Heat, Miami Dolphins, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tampa Bay Lightning, and Orlando Magic.
Texas: No state income tax. Home to 5 major pro franchises in the DFW area alone.
Tennessee: No income tax on wages (Hall Tax on interest/dividends fully phased out).
Nevada: No state income tax. Home to the Vegas Golden Knights, Las Vegas Raiders, and Las Vegas Aces.
Washington: No state income tax. Home to the Seattle Seahawks, Seattle Mariners, Seattle Sounders, and (returning) SuperSonics.
Wyoming, South Dakota: No state income tax; no major pro sports franchises currently.
New Hampshire: No income tax on wages (tax on investment income only).
Alaska: No state income tax; no major pro franchises.
Athletes who live in Florida, Texas, Nevada, or Washington save on every dollar of income attributed to home-state duty days. That advantage is real and measurable. A $10 million player on a Texas team saves roughly $910,000 per year compared to an identical player living in California (based on California’s 13.3% top rate on ~50% home-game allocation). Teams in no-tax states use this in contract negotiations.
City-Level Jock Taxes
Some cities layer their own income tax on top of state taxes. Athletes playing in these cities owe both state and city rates on income earned there:
City City Rate Notes
New York City 3.876% Added to NY state rate
Philadelphia 3.44% Added to PA state rate
Cleveland 2.5% Added to OH state rate
Columbus 2.5% Added to OH state rate
Pittsburgh 3.0% Added to PA state rate
Detroit 2.4% Added to MI state rate
Kansas City 1.0% Added to MO state rate
St. Louis 1.0% Added to MO state rate
Playing in New York City means facing a combined rate near 14.8% on New York-sourced income. For a player earning $500,000 in New York-allocated income, that’s roughly $74,000 in state and city tax on a single allocation slice.
Credits and Avoiding Double Taxation
How State Tax Credits Work
Most states allow residents to claim a credit for income taxes paid to other states on the same income. This is the primary mechanism for preventing full double taxation.
Here’s how it works: if a Texas-based athlete earns $100,000 in California-allocated income and pays $13,300 in California income tax, they don’t owe Texas tax on that same $100,000 (Texas has no income tax, so there’s nothing to credit). But if the same athlete moved to New York, New York would credit the $13,300 paid to California against the New York tax owed on that income.
The credit isn’t always dollar-for-dollar. Most states cap the credit at the lesser of: (a) the tax actually paid to the other state, or (b) what the home state would have charged on that same income. If you live in a high-tax state and earned income in a lower-tax state, you may still owe the difference to your home state.
Reciprocity Agreements
Some neighboring states have reciprocity agreements that simplify the process. Under reciprocity, residents of State A who earn income in State B only pay taxes in their home state (State A), not in both. They file one return instead of two.
Common reciprocity pairs include: Maryland/D.C./Virginia, Indiana/Kentucky, Ohio/Kentucky, and Michigan/Illinois. For athletes, reciprocity is most relevant for local sports markets where teams and players regularly cross state lines (think D.C.-area teams).
Reciprocity agreements don’t cover all income types and typically exclude athletes who are paid specifically for performance in the partner state. Verify with your tax preparer before assuming reciprocity applies to your situation.
Common Filing Mistakes
Missing filings and calculation errors are the most common and costly mistakes in multi-state athlete tax returns:
Missing a state return: every state with a game creates a filing obligation. Missing one triggers penalties and interest, often at rates higher than the original tax.
Wrong duty-day count: using game days only when the state counts all mandatory team activities understates the tax and creates an underpayment.
Not claiming credits: failing to claim home-state credits for taxes paid elsewhere means paying twice on the same income. We see this frequently with athletes who switch preparers mid-career.
Ignoring preseason: several states, California in particular, count preseason games and related practices as duty days. Athletes who play in California preseason games owe California tax even if the regular season never brings them back.
Signing bonuses: these are often partially allocated to multiple states based on where the player was when the contract was signed, where the first game was played, or a multi-year duty-day average. The allocation rules for bonuses differ by state and by contract structure.
The Texas Advantage for Athletes
No State Income Tax at Home
Texas has no state income tax. For athletes who live and play in Texas, every dollar of income tied to home-game duty days is taxed only at the federal level. No 5%, 9%, or 13% on top. Over a $5 million career year, that’s a meaningful number.
The advantage compounds over time. A 10-year career with $5 million per year in Texas-allocated income at a 10% average state rate (what a California or New York resident would face) represents $5 million in state taxes that Texas-based athletes don’t pay. This isn’t abstract. Teams actively recruit to this advantage.
But You Still Owe in Away States
Texas’s no-income-tax status only protects home-game income. The moment a Dallas Cowboys player flies to Los Angeles for a road game, California taxes that slice of their paycheck. The same is true for every away game in every state with an income tax.
A full NFL season takes players through 8 to 10 different states. A full NBA season involves even more road stops. Dallas Mavericks players still file in California, New York, Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, and anywhere else the schedule takes them. The home-state advantage reduces the tax load, but it doesn’t eliminate multi-state filing requirements.
Most Texas-based professional athletes file 10 to 20 state returns per year. The federal return plus all those state filings require coordination across withholding reconciliation, credit calculations, and different duty-day methodologies. This isn’t a situation for a general tax preparer.
Why Dallas Athletes Need Multi-State Planning
DFW has five major professional sports franchises: the Dallas Cowboys (NFL), Dallas Mavericks (NBA), Texas Rangers (MLB), Dallas Stars (NHL), and FC Dallas (MLS). The region also has major college programs at SMU and TCU locally, plus UT Austin, Texas A&M, Baylor, and Texas Tech drawing athletes from across the state. Broader Texas programs at Sam Houston, North Texas, and UTSA add to the NIL landscape.
For college athletes earning NIL income, the jock tax applies the same way. A Texas A&M quarterback who earns $2 million in NIL deals and plays road games in Alabama, Tennessee, Florida, Arkansas, Mississippi, and South Carolina will owe returns in several of those states depending on where NIL income was earned and how each state allocates it.
Athletes who want to understand the full tax picture can explore our multi-state filing guide for athletes for the step-by-step process, or see how much athletes actually pay in taxes for a contract-by-contract breakdown including jock tax impact.
SDO CPA handles multi-state complexity for Dallas-area athletes, including professional players, college NIL earners, and coaches who travel with teams. We analyze every state’s filing requirements, reconcile withholding against actual obligations, and make sure home-state credits are claimed correctly. The goal is paying exactly what’s owed in each state, not more.
For athletes using S-Corporations to receive endorsement income or manage personal services income, the state-level treatment can differ from individual income. Our S-Corp guide covers the federal structure, and we can explain how states treat S-Corp income for athletes specifically.
The tax planning services and tax preparation services pages explain how we approach complex individual situations. For athletes with multiple income streams (salary, signing bonuses, endorsements, investment income), see our complex individual returns page for what that engagement typically looks like.
Multi-state athlete tax filings require a preparer who knows which states use duty days versus games played, how each state treats bonuses and deferred compensation, and how to claim credits without triggering home-state audits.
I’m in the same boat to be honest. I initially said no but after reading through everyone’s thoughts, many bring up good points I wasn’t thinking about. He would definitely shore up our D line and for the right compensation I’d be inclined to change my opinion. Players at this position and caliber are hard to come by and draft picks are not guaranteed.KillerRaider30 wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 1:03 pm He had 51 pressures last year.
I said no but im almost inclined to say f[raiders_icon]ck it, Its 51 more than we had last year. ~
If he wasn't looking for that massive contract the Bucs would have already locked him up. Bucs love him. They are not low balling him by all reports I have read. He wants his last huge contact with a lot If it guaranteed. We would have to give him that plus the trade comp and it wont be a late round pickWillmark wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 4:01 pm If Vea could be garnered for the right amount? Sure/Maybe.
If he's looking for a lucrative "last contract?"
No.
I think it's not so much about 2026...as it is about the future.Be_Easy_25 wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 6:43 pm I don’t get the timeline talk.
The team just signed several free agents to help the team win football games right away.
How exactly does Vita Vea not fit into the Raiders winning more football games in 2026 timeline?
The team will be competitive this season unless Baker makes the mistake of not playing as well as he can. He does that, it will cost him in free agency.Goodtimes333 wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 8:58 pm Now Baker Mayfield is raking their asses over the fire. Hard up time for the Bucs financially between Baker and Vita
so you want a link, to open the same exact article to blister scroll thru ???raiderboyron wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 3:53 pm Got a blister scrolling thru that post... isn't "providing a link" allowed anymore? /s![]()