He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2025 12:56 pm
Tank is full speed ahead!
RaiderStation is the ultimate Las Vegas Raiders fan forum — join Raider Nation for bold takes, game-day analysis, news, rumors, and Silver & Black pride. Connect with fellow fans and be part of the discussion.
https://raiderstation.com/
Who said anything about Barmore?Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 6:18 pm Barmore has some significant recurring health issues and now also has criminal charges pending.
NoCruisin with Tooz wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 7:49 pm If Crosby were a FA now and we tagged him, do you think any other teams would offer him a contract?
Barmore has been brought up a few times in trade proposals.
Not in the one I posted. It was Harold Landry.
I realize that, but Barmore was featured in at least one and was posted on one of the pages, but it is not worth digging to find it.
Here it isRI RAIDER wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 10:55 am Sports radio here was talking about Barmore and the Pats 1st and 2nd for Max. I know a sports publication (I do not remember which one) proposed this trade a while back. I think thats about as good of a trade as we can get and TBH, I would not hate it. Barmore is younger than Max and plays a more difficult position to fill (DT). He was a STUD than had a blood clot (and missed most of the season). When he came back, the Pats switched from a 4-3 to a 3-4 which I think hurt him somewhat.
I bet that is a fairly big part for GM's and different from a lot of other blockbuster trades where you are going to get the player and then have to immediately make a new contract for top dollar. Not that he's cheap, but somehow reasonable.chucker wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:22 amBy the way, the cap cost of Maxx to a team that trades for him is easy to reduce after the trade with a simple restructure. They would need about $31 million available at the time of the trade becoming official, but could reduce his 2026 cap hit to about $7 million with a stroke of a pen. That is part of his appeal as a trade candidate to teams - he has 4 years left at a very reasonable rate.
He's a lot cheaper, in cash and cap, than Micah Parsons was.SkullCrusher wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:57 am I bet that is a fairly big part for GM's and different from a lot of other blockbuster trades where you are going to get the player and then have to immediately make a new contract for top dollar. Not that he's cheap, but somehow reasonable.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Some of ya'll hate him for talking about Raiders stuff and some of ya'll hate him for avoiding talking about this stuff. And some of ya'll hate him for just talking.
Some of us just want him gone for the long term benefit of the team and couldn't give two shits about stuff like this.Attyla wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 8:27 am Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Some of ya'll hate him for talking about Raiders stuff and some of ya'll hate him for avoiding talking about this stuff. And some of ya'll hate him for just talking.