Succession Plan
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2026 3:10 pm
Probably doesn’t need its own thread but I thought it would be Brady. Or is that still Brady?
RaiderStation is the ultimate Las Vegas Raiders fan forum — join Raider Nation for bold takes, game-day analysis, news, rumors, and Silver & Black pride. Connect with fellow fans and be part of the discussion.
https://raiderstation.com/
That’s why Native Americans were so superstitious about pictures, a women can magically become pregnant if she’s in a photo with a man.

Legally maybe but there is no way any woman would let the likes of Bowlcut father their kid.
No difference than last time Doofus was in a pic with some girl in a push-up bra. It’s Doofus. In a pic. Next to a girl. She’s as romantically connected to Doofus as anyone here at RS.RaiderandBulldog wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 3:15 am Legally maybe but there is no way any woman would let the likes of Bowlcut father their kid.
Now we know the origins of your username!GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 3:35 am No difference than last time Doofus was in a pic with some girl in a push-up bra. It’s Doofus. In a pic. Next to a girl. She’s as romantically connected to Doofus as anyone here at RS.
I believe the recent rule changes allow legacy owners to possess as little as a few percent of the company while still being in control. If I had to guess Mark isn't going anywhere anytime soon. He can liquidate almost all of his stakes and hold 1% of the Raiders but still be the controlling owner. But it makes sense to start looking at a succession plan.SkullCrusher wrote: Thu Mar 19, 2026 5:08 pm Would this be like near immediately or a succession plan for down the road?
NFL teams are starting to approach 10 billion for 100% stake, right? Do the math from there.
Mark could buy the whole WNBA.
I’d gladly trade any Mom & Pop Shop aw-shucks for an organization short on embarrassment and long on wins. It’s way past time for the Davis chapter to end.NoThanksSir wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 4:59 am I believe the recent rule changes allow legacy owners to possess as little as a few percent of the company while still being in control. If I had to guess Mark isn't going anywhere anytime soon. He can liquidate almost all of his stakes and hold 1% of the Raiders but still be the controlling owner. But it makes sense to start looking at a succession plan.
While it's comforting to hear that Brady is Durban's boy, it's somewhat concerning for me to think of a Raiders without the Davis family. The whole Ravens fiasco shows that if there is anything the Raiders have to be proud about, it's the class and commitment to treating their employees right. I hope the family/community the Davis's have built over the decades is retained in the transition to a less football oriented owner.
We have more championships than Baltimore and the Davis family can hold their head high knowing they treated their employees like humans with families. You can take the Ravens, I'll keep losing with a team I'm proud to be a fan ofGoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 5:23 am I’d gladly trade any Mom & Pop Shop aw-shucks for an organization short on embarrassment and long on wins. It’s way past time for the Davis chapter to end.
Supposedly it is over 40%. Gotta be careful that if there is a sale, it might not be from Davis' Stake. The Durban / Meldman Sale in late 2024 where each received 7.5% stake did not come entirely from Davis. They were labeled as original Raider Investors, Boscacci and Lovingfoss.mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 7:03 am so mark davis would have sold 17% of the club in the last few yrs ??? does anyone have a count of what the davis family now controls
At the very end that even matters more than rings for those involved.NoThanksSir wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 11:51 am The Davis family can hold their head high knowing they treated their employees like humans with families.