Raiderstation

The Icelandic Sea Monster is Real Confirms Icelandic Truth Comission

https://ufoholic.com/icelandic-truth-co ... ster-real/

https://youtu.be/fd5sxnDIOtA

AMAZING!!!!

200-Year-Old 'Time Capsule' Found

And now you can lay witness to the opening.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNJRWKCtKqo&t=1742s

A vaccine composition:
propyl acetate, 2-methylprople acetate, propanol, n-butyl acetate, 2-methylpropanol, 2-methyllbutyl acetate, n-butyl propanoate, n-butanol, n-pentyl acetate, 2-methylbut-3-enyl acetate, 2 methylbutanol, 3-methylbut-3-enol, 3-methylbut-2-enyl acetate, n-pentanol, n-hexyl acetate, z-hex-3-enyl acetate, hex-4-enyl acetate, n-hexanol, camphor, n-octanol, n-oct-2-enol and 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-benzene

Not one of these components are linked to any condition and each one are safe for humans in reasonable doses.

Just saying.

[quote=Attyla post_id=1160856]A vaccine composition:
propyl acetate, 2-methylprople acetate, propanol, n-butyl acetate, 2-methylpropanol, 2-methyllbutyl acetate, n-butyl propanoate, n-butanol, n-pentyl acetate, 2-methylbut-3-enyl acetate, 2 methylbutanol, 3-methylbut-3-enol, 3-methylbut-2-enyl acetate, n-pentanol, n-hexyl acetate, z-hex-3-enyl acetate, hex-4-enyl acetate, n-hexanol, camphor, n-octanol, n-oct-2-enol and 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-benzene

Not one of these components are linked to any condition and each one are safe for humans in reasonable doses.

Just saying.[/quote]that's a whole lot of meth

I can not yet confirm this..... but my guess Brady has aids.

Who looks older and more feeble in this photo?

https://twitter.com/fishsports/status/1 ... ter-update

[quote=Raider727 post_id=1160884]that's a whole lot of meth[/quote]That was pretty funny. But seriously, unless you are allergic to the vaccine itself or one of its chemical compounds, there is no link to any condition in small doses

[quote=Attyla post_id=1160856]A vaccine composition:
propyl acetate, 2-methylprople acetate, propanol, n-butyl acetate, 2-methylpropanol, 2-methyllbutyl acetate, n-butyl propanoate, n-butanol, n-pentyl acetate, 2-methylbut-3-enyl acetate, 2 methylbutanol, 3-methylbut-3-enol, 3-methylbut-2-enyl acetate, n-pentanol, n-hexyl acetate, z-hex-3-enyl acetate, hex-4-enyl acetate, n-hexanol, camphor, n-octanol, n-oct-2-enol and 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-benzene

Not one of these components are linked to any condition and each one are safe for humans in reasonable doses.

Just saying.[/quote]Which vaccine is that?

[quote=Xramfan post_id=1160949]Which vaccine is that?[/quote]it is just the base

Lead and drummer should be here in about 15 minutes.

[quote=Attyla post_id=1160953]it is just the base[/quote]https://68.media.tumblr.com/bc59be6a89a ... o1_500.gif

[quote=Raider727 post_id=1159477]Look at this bone, it's 10 million years old according to my?

How can you tell how old is dirt or water?[/quote]Bone is relatively easy - C14/C12 ratios.

[quote=srv5490 post_id=1161069]Bone is relatively easy - C14/C12 ratios.[/quote]For thousands of years maybe but millions?

[quote=Raider727 post_id=1161093]For thousands of years maybe but millions?[/quote]The most widely known form of radiometric dating is carbon-14 dating. This is what archaeologists use to determine the age of human-made artifacts. But carbon-14 dating won't work on dinosaur bones. The half-life of carbon-14 is only 5,730 years, so carbon-14 dating is only effective on samples that are less than 50,000 years old. Dinosaur bones, on the other hand, are millions of years old -- some fossils are billions of years old. To determine the ages of these specimens, scientists need an isotope with a very long half-life. Some of the isotopes used for this purpose are uranium-238, uranium-235 and potassium-40, each of which has a half-life of more than a million years.

Unfortunately, these elements don't exist in dinosaur fossils themselves. Each of them typically exists in igneous rock, or rock made from cooled magma. Fossils, however, form in sedimentary rock -- sediment quickly covers a dinosaur's body, and the sediment and the bones gradually turn into rock. But this sediment doesn't typically include the necessary isotopes in measurable amounts. Fossils can't form in the igneous rock that usually does contain the isotopes. The extreme temperatures of the magma would just destroy the bones.

So to determine the age of sedimentary rock layers, researchers first have to find neighboring layers of Earth that include igneous rock, such as volcanic ash. These layers are like bookends -- they give a beginning and an end to the period of time when the sedimentary rock formed. By using radiometric dating to determine the age of igneous brackets, researchers can accurately determine the age of the sedimentary layers between them.

Using the basic ideas of bracketing and radiometric dating, researchers have determined the age of rock layers all over the world. This information has also helped determine the age of the Earth itself. While the oldest known rocks on Earth are about 3.5 billion years old, researchers have found zircon crystals that are 4.3 billion years old [source: USGS]. Based on the analysis of these samples, scientists estimate that the Earth itself is about 4.5 billion years old. In addition, the oldest known moon rocks are 4.5 billion years old. Since the moon and the Earth probably formed at the same time, this supports the current idea of the Earth's age.

[quote=Xramfan post_id=1160949]Which vaccine is that?[/quote]So here is how this works, the new vaccines all are working with a new delivery system. Unlike the older vaccines which are based on a biologic, the new one's have this foundation delivery system that binds to receptors in the body. This is what the pharm companies are working toward going forward. You can attach any number of chemical compounds to this and they go to work. The benefit of the new vaccines is once delivered, they replicate in the body quickly offering up any number of benefits. One they are working on now would do the same thing with cancers. It is pretty cool and I am actually pretty impressed with the results I am hearing about. I travel for the holidays overseas so I am getting your Fauci update as soon as it available. I know you like mocking this but I am confident that the above chemical compound is completely safe and beneficial.

[quote=Attyla post_id=1160947]That was pretty funny. But seriously, unless you are allergic to the vaccine itself or one of its chemical compounds, there is no link to any condition in small doses[/quote]Then Go Get Some