Geno Smith Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 4:01 pm
RaiderStation is the ultimate Las Vegas Raiders fan forum — join Raider Nation for bold takes, game-day analysis, news, rumors, and Silver & Black pride. Connect with fellow fans and be part of the discussion.
https://raiderstation.com/
pfish57 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 7:52 am The fact that this beady eyed MF'er is getting 66 million guaranteed is nauseating to say the least!
There's a difference between whether he will be the QB and whether he should. I guess it's worth giving O'Connell another shot. He seems like a likable guy and maybe with two entire years in the same system he might do alright. The benefit of the doubt I give him is that he's now been in three different systems in three years. Other than that, we won't have many other options.BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:20 pm Lol but but but there's actual real life humans that think Geno will be our QB next year smh.
Opoponax50 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 8:40 am There's a difference between whether he will be the QB and whether he should. I guess it's worth giving O'Connell another shot. He seems like a likable guy and maybe with two entire years in the same system he might do alright. The benefit of the doubt I give him is that he's now been in three different systems in three years. Other than that, we won't have many other options.
No one is letting a good QB go, and no rookie is any kind of guarantee. If I have one big complaint about the NFL it's that the QB position is too important. It's always been the case that a good QB is the best weapon to have, but teams have done well with a middling guy under center too.
Build the team and at least give us a punchers chance. It's happened before. It's not likely but there are no better options.
Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
Yep. I pussed out over some rando on the internet wanting me to bet imaginary money on a Raiders message board. You got me!BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:08 am Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:08 am Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
That's what I thought.Hellbound wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Yep. I pussed out over some rando on the internet wanting me to bet imaginary money on a Raiders message board. You got me!
I think it will be a rookie that starts week 1. Who exactly that is, I'll need a few more weeks for that.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?
I did a double take too.
I'm on record stating that any of the top 5-10 rookie QBs likely have a better chance to give this team success than AO12, Pickett, Geno or Kyler Murray with the added bonus being their age and rookie contract. As for trading three 1s, I've been very clear that if there is a QB that Spytek thinks could be a franchise QB (not saying there is one), they are priceless. Exactly why i wanted to trade Maxx. But we wont have to trade at all if we end up with the 1st pick.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:31 am Based on the college season so far, do you see a qb that will be NFL-ready week 1? And if there is, do you see this team giving up 3 #1's to get him?
AOC I hope. Pickett sucks. We can lose with either, but I'd rather lose with our own draft pick than with a Squeelers cast off.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?
See, A012 is on the same level as Geno for me. Why would anyone want to see him under center? We know what he is. Trash. Same with Pickett.Dr Death wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:20 am AOC I hope. Pickett sucks. We can lose with either, but I'd rather lose with our own draft pick than with a Squeelers cast off.
I at least think AOC is likeable. I didn't really folkow him with the hawks but now that hes on my team, Geno isnt even likeable.BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:23 am See, A012 is on the same level as Geno for me. Why would anyone want to see him under center? We know what he is. Trash. Same with Pickett.