Raiderstation

Obvious Mendoza #1 no consideration of trading that pick.
But who you got picks 2 - 4 thats going to help Mendoza.

#2 Raiders should be able to select WR Chris Bell or WR KC Concepcion with our early 2nd.

#3 I forget who it was, but someone here mentioned that the best pure dominant RT coming out of college could be got in the 3rd. And stated hes played his whole career at RT, and not being moved around the line.

Sounds like solid gets

Id hope the rest of the draft is building the trenches, with maybe 1 DB in there

Who else you like ?

Rabidraider wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 8:40 am Plus we have three 4th rounders, so its like getting him for free.

How is that like getting him for free? It's like getting him for a 4th round pick .
If you have 3 $100 bills in your pocket and buy something for $100 is it like getting it for free because you have 2 left?

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 10:39 am How is that like getting him for free? It's like getting him for a 4th round pick .
If you have 3 $100 bills in your pocket and buy something for $100 is it like getting it for free because you have 2 left?

Funny you should ask, I have an extra $100 coming from that guy who bet me $100 that we won't draft Mendoza.

chucker wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 10:47 am Funny you should ask, I have an extra $100 coming from that guy who bet me $100 that we won't draft Mendoza.

And that is like free

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 10:39 am How is that like getting him for free? It's like getting him for a 4th round pick .
If you have 3 $100 bills in your pocket and buy something for $100 is it like getting it for free because you have 2 left?

Its like I have three bikes and if I give one away I still have a ride or two. I don't sweat it like if I had only one bike.

Rabidraider wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 1:19 pm Its like I have three bikes and if I give one away I still have a ride or two. I don't sweat it like if I had only one bike.

That still does not make it free.

Attyla wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 1:40 pm That still does not make it free.

You guys are too literal. Jesus...

I said "so its like getting him for free."

Rabidraider wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 1:41 pm You guys are too literal. Jesus...

I said "so its like getting him for free."

But it is not even like getting him for free. We are giving up a pick. And every pick you gave up something to get except for the actual picks your team gets slotted for your draft position. So there is an initial cost.

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 10:39 am How is that like getting him for free? It's like getting him for a 4th round pick .
If you have 3 $100 bills in your pocket and buy something for $100 is it like getting it for free because you have 2 left?

It is free because if you have 3 $100 bills in your pocket, youre wearing someone else's pants.

Rabidraider wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 1:41 pm You guys are too literal. Jesus...

I said "so its like getting him for free."

Evidently, it's a slow day for Raider news. Someone must've called the grammar police.

Rabidraider wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 1:19 pm Its like I have three bikes and if I give one away I still have a ride or two. I don't sweat it like if I had only one bike.

The correct number of bikes you need is N+1. Where N is the number of bikes you have now.

chucker wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 2:04 pm The correct number of bikes you need is N+1. Where N is the number of bikes you have now.

N+1/Z

Where Z is how much of a b**ch your w/gf is

Attyla wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 1:40 pm That still does not make it free.

I have heard this term thrown around for decadeS now.

Especially from politicians. There is nothing free. Nothing.

chucker wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 2:04 pm The correct number of bikes you need is N+1. Where N is the number of bikes you have now.

Get a drivers license, buy a car, problem solved

chucker wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 2:04 pm The correct number of bikes you need is N+1. Where N is the number of bikes you have now.

Is this a one-time calculation or is the calculation meant to be iterated?