Raiders set to release QB Geno Smith after 1 season in Las Vegas

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,675
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 445 times

Raiders set to release QB Geno Smith after 1 season in Las Vegas

Unread post by heavyD »

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/708979 ... iders-nfl/

Should surprise nobody as he would be a horrible mentor for Mendoza. While Raiders fans should be eternally greatful that Geno was so terrible that the Raiders finally finished 32, this guy won't be missed. Raiders have had a lot of terrible QB's over the years but he's by far the least likeable of the lot. Whether he was on the sidelines looking dejected and mopy, or flipping the bird to fans, he came off extremely unlikeable and the fact is that he was one of the very worst QB's in 2025. Good riddance!
These users gave a High Five to the author heavyD for the post (total 4):
rich72, raider_kin, rhumbob, 352Raider
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,675
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 445 times

Unread post by heavyD »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:51 am Its not 27 million. You dont understand the process. The Raiders would convert a portion of his salary (eg 13 million) into a bonus, then trade him. The Raiders take the cap hit for 13 million instead of the18.5 cap hit they would take by cutting him. The acquiring team takes the cap hit for the redone salary, 13.5 million.
I fully understand the process from the other side. What teams are lining up to pay Geno Smith anything when better QB’s like Murray, Tua, Cousins, Willis, etc will all be available? Smith will likely be a consolidation prize for a team that misses out on the other QB’s and should be able to be signed on the cheap. All these QB’s are getting released because interested teams want to sign them on their own terms.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1216 times
Received High Fives: 2922 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 10:03 am Reducing the dead money increases the cap space by that amount. Every dollar you reduce the dead cap hit by increases the cap space by 1 dollar. Youre basically saying you want that 8 million in cap space instead of 13 million in cap space.
read chuckers comment
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,726
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 225 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Attyla wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 10:57 am read chuckers comment
I did.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,068
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2084 times
Received High Fives: 2801 times

Unread post by chucker »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:58 am Convert 13.5 of the guaranteed 18.5 before the remaining 8 vests? Yes. So they get the 8 million savings + another possible 5. But why not try and trade him for nothing before you cut him? That way you are definitely getting the extra 5.
Sure but I think the odds of trading him are basically zero. If you leave him with a $5 million guaranteed plus the $8 million that is still remaining to vest then a team has to commit to $13 million. I don't think anyone is even doing a late round pick swap for that money. I'm not saying it wouldn't be awesome, but I'm being realistic that it isn't happening. I think it's possible that he ends up getting more than $5 million - although I think he may not even get that much. It doesn't cost anything to find out and might save the team $4 million.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1216 times
Received High Fives: 2922 times

Unread post by Attyla »

chucker wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 11:32 am Sure but I think the odds of trading him are basically zero. If you leave him with a $5 million guaranteed plus the $8 million that is still remaining to vest then a team has to commit to $13 million. I don't think anyone is even doing a late round pick swap for that money. I'm not saying it wouldn't be awesome, but I'm being realistic that it isn't happening. I think it's possible that he ends up getting more than $5 million - although I think he may not even get that much. It doesn't cost anything to find out and might save the team $4 million.
who is trading for that contract, not one person
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
chucker, Willmark
User avatar
RickRyb
The Assassin
Posts: 1,597
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1151 times
Received High Fives: 438 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

Does this close the door on the few that believed The Raiders should trade the 1st pick for a huge return?
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,726
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 225 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

The guy was playing on a $25 million/year contract for a team that knows what theyre doing, in Seattle, the year before. Lets face it, our OL and OC deserve a great deal of ownership over his performance. Did his perception around the league tank so much that a qb-needy team in a year with few draft options wouldnt consider 1 year at half what he was making in Seattle? If thats the case, so be it. I wouldnt even ask for a prospect swap. Have them give us a Joeschmo FA they arent resigning who was not even good enough to get them a comp pick -- essentially nothing in return. If a trade doesnt materialize, so be it. Then my proposal converges to your proposal.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,674
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 41 times
Received High Fives: 1408 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Geno is going to be 36. Maybe he's not 100% as bad as he looked last year but his career is winding down. He's probably a 5 million per year backup now.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
RunOverByHubbard
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,726
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 225 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

RickRyb wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 11:52 am Does this close the door on the few that believed The Raiders should trade the 1st pick for a huge return?
Everything has a price. Who would pay it?
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1216 times
Received High Fives: 2922 times

Unread post by Attyla »

He had one good year in Seattle. He is not trade worthy because teams know we aren't keeping him. Why give up anything for a guy who will be on the market in two days? People seem to think "hey, we don't want his soggy ass but there is a market for the guy" while not realizing he was on the worst team in the league and threw an bunch of picks. Will someone sign him? Sure, there is a sad number of QB needy teams and only so many guys to fill those needs. Is anyone trading for him? Not one team
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,134
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 508 times
Received High Fives: 660 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

I want to personally thank Geno for setting up the Raiders to have the realistic opportunity to finally alter their coarse and get back to winning ways we from the old school are accustomed to. Geno, you have left us with the winds of change a blowing. Your work is done, now get the f[raiders_icon]ck out of here.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post (total 2):
RunOverByHubbard, Sufferghost
User avatar
Arsenal Raider
SnakeMad Max
Posts: 1,817
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:40 am
Has given High Fives: 326 times
Received High Fives: 168 times

Unread post by Arsenal Raider »

Probably the worst personality/attitude of a QB in Raiders history.

I can see why his own teammate knocked him out 11 years ago.
These users gave a High Five to the author Arsenal Raider for the post (total 3):
RaiderandBulldog, Sufferghost, The Silver Pillager
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1216 times
Received High Fives: 2922 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 11:59 am Everything has a price. Who would pay it?
Mike Ditka
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
RickRyb
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,068
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2084 times
Received High Fives: 2801 times

Unread post by chucker »

I suspect that the Raiders explored the option of paying a bunch of Geno's salary in these discussions and got nowhere. I think that one issue is that teams may want to see how some other QBs look for price and availability before they'd look at Geno so the timeline may not fit for a trade, even if the money is cheap.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,018
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 486 times
Received High Fives: 625 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Dude sucked here but the deck was heavily stacked against him.
F rated OC and a oline that competed with 2006.

He was part of the deliver us to Fernando group.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post (total 2):
Willmark, dred
Post Reply