On to the Bills

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,599
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1218 times
Received High Fives: 2919 times

On to the Bills

Unread post by Attyla »

Back home, spread should be around 6.5 or so.

Let' go back to being competitive. Discuss. Bills have not won a SB. This is my way of saying we are better than them. I know, it does not help.
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,354
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2699 times
Received High Fives: 1183 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

We better hear about some personnel changes for the Bills
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,840
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1126 times
Received High Fives: 1013 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Hoping for a win for selfish reasons: living in western NY. The bills fans will be insufferable, more so than normal.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,018
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 486 times
Received High Fives: 625 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Oaktownonly wrote: Sun Oct 11, 2026 5:13 pm The Bills are ranked 27th in pass defense. What would it hurt to start Mendoza at home? Does Cousin's really give us the best chance to win. This reminds me of when teams stacked the box with Carr because he would throw to his check down all the time.
So Cousins now has 3 good games, 1 ok game and 1 bad game and was the bad game on him or the D dictating to our Offense what they will allow? If they want to go Mendoza fine, but one bad game and it's like that for Cousin's? We forget and disregard the rest and put total weight on what you did last game as this is who you now are going forward? That's what Brown's fans do.

And why was Cousin's bad yesterday? Relentless pressure what I prefer Mendoza not to face immediately. We failed the offseason with the oline overall and now we have to wait another year to address it properly. The moment you fix the oline the QB, RB's and yes even the WR's all of a sudden become a lot better. Like magic.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post (total 3):
Rick In Bakersfield, Opoponax50, Steve007
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 61 times
Received High Fives: 199 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

SkullCrusher wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2026 8:47 am So Cousins now has 3 good games, 1 ok game and 1 bad game and was the bad game on him or the D dictating to our Offense what they will allow? If they want to go Mendoza fine, but one bad game and it's like that for Cousin's? We forget and disregard the rest and put total weight on what you did last game as this is who you now are going forward? That's what Brown's fans do.

And why was Cousin's bad yesterday? Relentless pressure what I prefer Mendoza not to face immediately. We failed the offseason with the oline overall and now we have to wait another year to address it properly. The moment you fix the oline the Q, RB's and yes even the WR's all of a sudden become a lot better. Like magic.
Raiders drafted Mendoza to be the QB of the future; he not going to learn while standing on the sideline; basically opposing team are crowding the box which either means that they don’t fear Cousin Arm strength; would they be doing that if Mendoza was the QB….we might not win many games with Mendoza the starting QB; but it will be learning experience for him in which in 2027 he be a better QB for it….
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,356
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 139 times
Received High Fives: 753 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

raider_kin wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2026 8:36 am We better hear about some personnel changes for the Bills
Even if they are two O-linemen short and two D-backs short, I don't think we stop Allen and I don't think our running game will suddenly shine.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,630
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 877 times
Received High Fives: 276 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Hopeful for a competitive game. Hope Washington gets 10-20 carries.

If the game isn't competitive, I would like to see Mendoza play again, maybe for a full quarter.
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,067
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 260 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

SuperRaider wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2026 9:49 am Raiders drafted Mendoza to be the QB of the future; he not going to learn while standing on the sideline; basically opposing team are crowding the box which either means that they don’t fear Cousin Arm strength; would they be doing that if Mendoza was the QB….we might not win many games with Mendoza the starting QB; but it will be learning experience for him in which in 2027 he be a better QB for it….
If I had to guess, comfort level in the offence is the reason Mendoza’s not starting yet. I think a lot of what’s made our passing game work is the flexibility Kirk has at the line. I’m sure they probably prefer Mendo to have that same comfort level in the offence to do the same. May just be the case right now that Mendo’s gonna be running a more scripted offence at this point in his development.

And don’t get me wrong I want to see Mendoza sooner rather than later too. But I think it also makes sense they don’t want ti rush it. The worst thing that happens isn’t just that we lose - it’s that he gets overwhelmed, loses confidence, and develops bad habits that can be hard to fix.

Ideally you want him to know the offence like the back of his hand, so he’s competing against the defence only - not against the defence + an offensive system he can’t fully run.
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

raiders93 wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2026 12:48 pm If I had to guess, comfort level in the offence is the reason Mendoza’s not starting yet. I think a lot of what’s made our passing game work is the flexibility Kirk has at the line. I’m sure they probably prefer Mendo to have that same comfort level in the offence to do the same. May just be the case right now that Mendo’s gonna be running a more scripted offence at this point in his development.

And don’t get me wrong I want to see Mendoza sooner rather than later too. But I think it also makes sense they don’t want ti rush it. The worst thing that happens isn’t just that we lose - it’s that he gets overwhelmed, loses confidence, and develops bad habits that can be hard to fix.

Ideally you want him to know the offence like the back of his hand, so he’s competing against the defence only - not against the defence + an offensive system he can’t fully run.
I don't necessarily disagree but I'll die on the hill that he didnt get enough (if any) reps with the 1s all offseason. That's also why I cant and wont judge him for his preseason play.
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,352
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 200 times
Received High Fives: 437 times

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

These users gave a High Five to the author RaiderandBulldog for the post:
Xramfan
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,070
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2087 times
Received High Fives: 2806 times

Unread post by chucker »

User avatar
Atlasffa
Posts: 13,148
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Just Win Baby!
Has given High Fives: 185 times
Received High Fives: 754 times

Unread post by Atlasffa »

User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,670
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 664 times
Received High Fives: 359 times

Unread post by rich72 »

Hopefully tonight's game goes into overtime, with lots of hard hitting by the rams.
These users gave a High Five to the author rich72 for the post:
Atlasffa
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,979
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1558 times
Received High Fives: 1600 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Atlasffa wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2026 4:22 pm
Spy treats his draft capital like an old lady and her coin purse. STINGY!!! And I’m all for it. Build a foundation through the draft. Until then, little pickups like this. It ain’t exciting, especially after the shellacking we took this weekend, but slow and steady wins the race.
User avatar
Atlasffa
Posts: 13,148
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Just Win Baby!
Has given High Fives: 185 times
Received High Fives: 754 times

Unread post by Atlasffa »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2026 4:33 pm Spy treats his draft capital like an old lady and her coin purse. STINGY!!! And I’m all for it. Build a foundation through the draft. Until then, little pickups like this. It ain’t exciting, especially after the shellacking we took this weekend, but slow and steady wins the race.
Maybe a diamond in the rough? Which team is tanking and do they have anyone we would be interested in.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,018
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 486 times
Received High Fives: 625 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

LOL watching our next two opponents.
Post Reply