Spencer Burford,G, in For a Visit - update: signed with Raiders

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,619
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1221 times
Received High Fives: 2950 times

Spencer Burford,G, in For a Visit - update: signed with Raiders

Unread post by Attyla »

Per Ryan McFadden we are looking at Burford
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,187
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 422 times
Received High Fives: 295 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Competition/depth?
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,738
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 228 times
Received High Fives: 508 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

16 to 88 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 5:55 pm Competition/depth?

Hopefully not someone who is active on the gameday roster.
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
RI RAIDER
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,358
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 139 times
Received High Fives: 753 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

He was mostly a starter for the 49ers.Why are some opposed to this signing? One way to look at it— is he an upgrade over Parham?
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 4:29 am He was mostly a starter for the 49ers.Why are some opposed to this signing? One way to look at it— is he an upgrade over Parham?
You're an upgrade over Parham
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,071
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2099 times
Received High Fives: 2810 times

Unread post by chucker »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 4:29 am He was mostly a starter for the 49ers.Why are some opposed to this signing? One way to look at it— is he an upgrade over Parham?
I assume that there's too much PFF scouting going on. And I think PFF actually liked Parham. Burford is likely not better than Parham, but he's a lot less money and he's depth IMO. Parham would probably be better in a ZBS with better coaching, but I think our starting guards are likely going to be JPJ and Rogers - both of whom likely outperform Parham's best.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 2):
FLORIDARAYDAH, Goodtimes333
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,157
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 993 times
Received High Fives: 614 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

chucker wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 5:05 am I assume that there's too much PFF scouting going on. And I think PFF actually liked Parham. Burford is likely not better than Parham, but he's a lot less money and he's depth IMO. Parham would probably be better in a ZBS with better coaching, but I think our starting guards are likely going to be JPJ and Rogers - both of whom likely outperform Parham's best.
Yeah the same people go by PFF when it suits there need and it sucks when it doesnt. Buford had a bad grade so he sucks. Parham had a solid grade PFF is crap. The tie breaker I guess is the old " my friend is a niner fan and he said" :grin:
These users gave a High Five to the author FLORIDARAYDAH for the post (total 4):
chucker, Opoponax50, rcraider, Raiders Baby
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,848
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1140 times
Received High Fives: 1016 times

Unread post by Willmark »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 6:32 am Yeah the same people go by PFF when it suits there need and it sucks when it doesnt. Buford had a bad grade so he sucks. Parham had a solid grade PFF is crap. The tie breaker I guess is the old " my friend is a niner fan and he said" :grin:
I can only answer for what I saw: Parham (nearly every time) somewhere in the backfield getting blown off the LOS.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
RI RAIDER
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,358
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1050 times
Received High Fives: 585 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

Every fan base gets excited over a FA signing. Sure we hope that this kid can excel and play better with a change of scenery. If you pay attention to the Niner fans, they all say this kid blows. Its funny because a few of my friends are die hard Jets fans. They all think Parham was a good signing. I had to burst their bubble and let them know that he BLOWS and will be out of the league at the conclusion of his contract.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,358
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1050 times
Received High Fives: 585 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

Willmark wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 7:18 am I can only answer for why I saw: Parham (nearly every time) somewhere in the backfield getting blown off the LOS.
Bingo. The few other times he doesn't get blown off the LOS are the times he doesn't hit or engage with anyone. The lost look he had was priceless (in a bad way).
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,727
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1159 times
Received High Fives: 593 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 6:32 am Yeah the same people go by PFF when it suits there need and it sucks when it doesnt. Buford had a bad grade so he sucks. Parham had a solid grade PFF is crap. The tie breaker I guess is the old " my friend is a niner fan and he said" :grin:
IMO, PFF lost credibility when it used to give Carr such high marks, which then manifested itself through fanboys who posted insufferable shit here.

Stats can provide a piece of the picture, but they can't evaluate a player's intangibles e.g. leadership, work ethic, coming through in the clutch, etc.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post:
FLORIDARAYDAH
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,157
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 993 times
Received High Fives: 614 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

Opoponax50 wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 8:32 am IMO, PFF lost credibility when it used to give Carr such high marks, which then manifested itself through fanboys who posted insufferable shit here.

Stats can provide a piece of the picture, but they can't evaluate a player's intangibles e.g. leadership, work ethic, coming through in the clutch, etc.
I agree. It never shows the big picture. I can't use it as proof of anything
These users gave a High Five to the author FLORIDARAYDAH for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,358
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 139 times
Received High Fives: 753 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

RI RAIDER wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 7:25 am Every fan base gets excited over a FA signing. Sure we hope that this kid can excel and play better with a change of scenery. If you pay attention to the Niner fans, they all say this kid blows. Its funny because a few of my friends are die hard Jets fans. They all think Parham was a good signing. I had to burst their bubble and let them know that he BLOWS and will be out of the league at the conclusion of his contract.
I watch enough of the 49ers games to get a sense for how that team is doing. They’ve had a lot of problems with their offensive line the last several years, mostly due to injury. They’ve tried various combinations, but unlike the Raiders to end up with a complete crap line, they end up with a pretty stable group of guys who get the job mostly done. He was part of that line at many times over the last three years and I never heard any complaints about him just complaints about the revolving door due to injuries. The big difference is, the Raiders have bad coaching and bad players and the 49ers have good coaching and schemes which can kind of mask subpar players.
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,451
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 875 times
Received High Fives: 1724 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

Kubiak likely has the inside track from Klay as to what Burford brings or doesnt bring. The good news that this is a new day for the Raiders and if players dont cut it, they will be replaced........or so I hope.
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post (total 2):
Goodtimes333, RI RAIDER
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,742
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 626 times
Received High Fives: 1045 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 6:32 am Yeah the same people go by PFF when it suits there need and it sucks when it doesnt. Buford had a bad grade so he sucks. Parham had a solid grade PFF is crap. The tie breaker I guess is the old " my friend is a niner fan and he said" :grin:
Exactly like Fly when he claimed Miller was going to be a bust because his brother went to UCLA and watched the games
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
FLORIDARAYDAH
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,742
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 626 times
Received High Fives: 1045 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Xramfan wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 9:16 am Kubiak likely has the inside track from Klay as to what Burford brings or doesnt bring. The good news that this is a new day for the Raiders and if players dont cut it, they will be replaced........or so I hope.
Nope. He sucks, have you not read the posts?
Post Reply