He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2025 12:56 pm
Tank is full speed ahead!
RaiderStation is the ultimate Las Vegas Raiders fan forum — join Raider Nation for bold takes, game-day analysis, news, rumors, and Silver & Black pride. Connect with fellow fans and be part of the discussion.
https://raiderstation.com/
No, you wrote some bullshit that got called outCruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Feb 14, 2026 6:26 pm Says the guy who wrote, "all he did was miss a day of work". Now thats some epic revisionist history to suit an agenda.
Dear God. He missed a day of work and posted a video.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Feb 14, 2026 6:06 pm Why did he post that video when he did? What was he trying to say?
In one of Madden's books, he mentioned that as a rookie head coach, he'd always run into the field whenever a player got hurt. One of the doctors finally told him to stop doing that, saying (roughly) "If a player sees you, he won't be honest with me. He'll say he's OK even if he's not because he doesn't want to disappoint you."RickRyb wrote: Sat Feb 14, 2026 9:05 am Isn't there an old adage in sports that sometimes others have to step in to save a player from himself?
That particular injury would not have gotten significantly worse had he played. If we had been in the hunt he would have played. But he posted a video, if he were a Jedi Knight, he would have had his light saber taken from him for a week!!!Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 4:17 am In one of Madden's books, he mentioned that as a rookie head coach, he'd always run into the field whenever a player got hurt. One of the doctors finally told him to stop doing that, saying (roughly) "If a player sees you, he won't be honest with me. He'll say he's OK even if he's not because he doesn't want to disappoint you."
Maxx obviously wanted to play, but the subsequent surgery proved there was a legitimate medical excuse for shutting him down. Imagine if we hadn't shut him down and he'd seriously injured himself.
He's a diva. A lot of great players are. Not the worst thing in the world, either. I'd rather have a diva who cares about the team than some guy who says "We lost. Meh."
There is a difference between being the leader and good leadership. Just because you are a leader, it doesn't mean you have good leadership qualities. Josh McDaniels was our leader. Did he have good leadership qualities? Crosby is the de facto leader because he's the best player, at least on that side of the ball. But based upon this episode and other instances where he has inserted himself into decisions that were not his to make, and the way he issued veiled threats and tried to throw his weight around to strong arm leverage a decision he desired, I don't see him as someone with the desirable leadership qualities that I want in a player-leader to spearhead a total youth movement rebuild. The player-leader needs to be in sync with management. There shouldn't be any daylight between him and management. He has to be like the drill sergeant. The one who tows the line, enforcing discipline and making sure others aren't talking out of turn. Crosby doesn't even have the discipline and temperament to stop himself from talking out of turn, so he's not the leader to lead this rebuild. He has even gone on record admitting he doesn't want to be part of another rebuild. Let that sink in for a moment. And yet inexplicably, look how many fans insist he's the man for the job.CWood24 wrote: Sat Feb 14, 2026 10:39 pm I mean the lies about his leadership aren’t doing you any favours
He lead when he is on the field & from what we know about off the field from his teammates who around him way more than you he is a great leader as well
You talk about his loyalty to the team & doing whats right for the team but why should players show loyalty to who they play for as they could be cut or traded in a moment without say so
I guarantee no one will be complaining about being loyal & doing what is right for the team when we are showing Geno the door
If we trade him for good value then great if we dont then great it is win win either way at that moment in time
In the first place, I dont have to prove my point. It is an opinion I expressed, which I supported with known observations, knowledge of human behavior and past observations of his behavior. You can take it or leave it. But the contention that his intent was not to disparage Spytek is not tenable. All of the circumstantial evidence available strongly suggests the opposite.Attyla wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 12:49 pm
Jesus, you wrote a book to try and prove a point you can never prove because you are using a subjective argument but are trying to make it objective. It is not. If you were a cow, you would have to render yourself!!
https://www.google.com/search?q=example ... s-wiz-serp
refusing to perform assigned tasks, leaving early without permission, arguing, using abusive language, or publicly undermining management.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 2:01 pm https://www.google.com/search?q=example ... s-wiz-serp
Youre the gift that keeps giving!!!!![]()
Keep it up!!!
Expand the link and take your pick:NewEraX25 wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 2:12 pm refusing to perform assigned tasks, leaving early without permission, arguing, using abusive language, or publicly undermining management.
What exactly did Maxx do that met these requirements?
LOL so you want me to do the leg work? Naw no thanks. This is just sad.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 2:28 pm Expand the link and take your pick:
Insubordination in the workplace involves an employee intentionally disregarding, defying, or showing disrespect toward authority, such as refusing direct orders, ignoring policies, or sabotaging work. Common examples include refusing to perform assigned tasks, leaving early without permission, arguing, using abusive language, or publicly undermining management.
Common Examples of Insubordination
Refusing Direct Orders/Tasks: Explicitly saying "no" to a supervisor's reasonable assignment or deliberately doing it incorrectly.
Disrespectful Behavior: Using foul language, engaging in yelling, or making aggressive gestures toward a manager.
Ignoring Company Policies: Repeatedly violating safety, attendance, or operational rules, such as refusing to clock in/out.
Undermining Authority: Mocking, ridiculing, or publicly questioning a manager’s competence or decisions to embarrass them.
Sabotaging Work: Intentionally hindering, delaying, or damaging team projects, workflows, or company property.
Leaving/Absence: Abandoning shifts, leaving work early without authorization, or failing to report to work without notice.
Disrespectful Communication: Using a condescending tone, rolling eyes, or refusing to answer follow-up questions from management.
Key Considerations
this is all just petty shit. "uhh! you didn't follow section 3, paragraph 13, rule 21 in the employee manual!!"Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 2:28 pm Expand the link and take your pick:
Insubordination in the workplace involves an employee intentionally disregarding, defying, or showing disrespect toward authority, such as refusing direct orders, ignoring policies, or sabotaging work. Common examples include refusing to perform assigned tasks, leaving early without permission, arguing, using abusive language, or publicly undermining management.
Common Examples of Insubordination
Refusing Direct Orders/Tasks: Explicitly saying "no" to a supervisor's reasonable assignment or deliberately doing it incorrectly.
Disrespectful Behavior: Using foul language, engaging in yelling, or making aggressive gestures toward a manager.
Ignoring Company Policies: Repeatedly violating safety, attendance, or operational rules, such as refusing to clock in/out.
Undermining Authority: Mocking, ridiculing, or publicly questioning a manager’s competence or decisions to embarrass them.
Sabotaging Work: Intentionally hindering, delaying, or damaging team projects, workflows, or company property.
Leaving/Absence: Abandoning shifts, leaving work early without authorization, or failing to report to work without notice.
Disrespectful Communication: Using a condescending tone, rolling eyes, or refusing to answer follow-up questions from management.
Key Considerations