The Off. Line - Complaints, Fixes, Questions, Draft

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
erickench
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 118 times

The Off. Line - Complaints, Fixes, Questions, Draft

Unread post by erickench »

Mike Tice once said while coaching for the Raiders: “If you look at the offense like a fancy car, the offensive line is the engine. Even though we might have nice spinners and nice rims and tinted windows and some neat paint job, it doesn’t mean crap without the engine. If the engine’s not working, the car might look like a pretty nice car, but it’s a piece of crap.” And he was 100% right. I wish we had him back. Changes must be made on the O-line. Charles Grant is a very athletic lineman. We should give him some reps at right tackle. Bring back Powers-Johnson as the starter at center. Parham has got to go. Maybe we should consider moving Meredith back to guard. He did so well there last year. :cuss:
These users gave a High Five to the author erickench for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, mranquales
User avatar
erickench
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 118 times

Unread post by erickench »

RaiderFan1 wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:53 pm Meredith is shit
Meredith was one of the best guards in 2024. Moving him to center may have been a mistake but according to his PFF grades he isn't doing too bad. :blush:
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 414 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

erickench wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 10:04 am Meredith was one of the best guards in 2024. Moving him to center may have been a mistake but according to his PFF grades he isn't doing too bad. :blush:
...I don't completely disregard the pff grades, but my eyes have told me an entirely different story when I've been able to see him at center.
These users gave a High Five to the author WNYRAIDER for the post:
BoJacksonRules
User avatar
erickench
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 118 times

Unread post by erickench »

WNYRAIDER wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 11:14 am ...I don't completely disregard the pff grades, but my eyes have told me an entirely different story when I've been able to see him at center.
It's the two douchebags lining up beside him who are f[raiders_icon]cking up. They could still put JPJ back at center and Meredith back at guard. But who would the other guard be?
User avatar
Sir Raider Duck, OMS
The AssassinFernandoJeanty
Posts: 10,545
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:58 pm
Location: The Principality of Sealand
Has given High Fives: 318 times
Received High Fives: 272 times

Unread post by Sir Raider Duck, OMS »

erickench wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 12:08 pm It's the two douchebags lining up beside him who are fcking up. They could still put JPJ back at center and Meredith back at guard. But who would the other guard be?
I find it very difficult to believe that Caleb Rogers would be worse than either Cappa or Parham. Maybe not any better, but definitely not worse.
User avatar
erickench
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 118 times

Unread post by erickench »

Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 12:12 pm I find it very difficult to believe that Caleb Rogers would be worse than either Cappa or Parham. Maybe not any better, but definitely not worse.
Rogers was a bit of a reach when they drafted him. Grant has a future as a starter. He's athletically elite, but just a bit undersized.
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,447
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 462 times
Received High Fives: 556 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »



Begging you guys to stop paying attention to PFF. It doesn't help any point you're trying to make.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoThanksSir for the post (total 2):
mranquales, Rainman56
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

NoThanksSir wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 1:01 pm

Begging you guys to stop paying attention to PFF. It doesn't help any point you're trying to make.
The second to the last one is Waterboy shit right there.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,687
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 41 times
Received High Fives: 1422 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Kenyon Green has got to be better than Parham.

You dont want to change four guys but get Cappa and Parham off the field at least.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
Vercingetorix
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,659
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1240 times
Received High Fives: 2963 times

Unread post by Attyla »

NoThanksSir wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 1:01 pm

Begging you guys to stop paying attention to PFF. It doesn't help any point you're trying to make.
it is a tool, and like any tool, you have to use it properly. PFF grades are flawed for the very reason any grading system is flawed, simply put, you are using a numbering system to reflect observations which are tainted by opinion. There can never be a consensus of a player ranking simply because there are so many subjective factors and subjective factors require opinions to creep in.

That said, if you use a tool like PFF be prepared to justify the conclusions you pull from that tool, both positive and negative. It is like QBR, ESPN went out of its way to create a tool they thought better represented a grading of QB play over the tried and true QB Rating scale. They kind of did it but they kind of did not. And to this day, on their box score they include both. Why include both if yours is superior? Again, simply put, because it was still very flawed.


But then again, so are your opinions (not the quoted poster but all of us) and yet you would get carried out on a shield defending your opinions as the gospel according to the ultimate Raiders fan.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
heavyD, powski
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,681
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 455 times

Unread post by heavyD »

Instant replay gets way more calls right than the days of living with the officials call on the field but there’s still the human element of the official interpreting the replay so it’s still not perfect. Advanced stats give us a better understanding of how a player or team performed but as with instant reply it’s still not infallible because humans are gathering the data based on interpretation of video.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,460
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 881 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

JPJ obviously did something we don’t know about. Why is he the only one in competition for a starting spot when the other 3 interior guys are ass?
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post (total 4):
powski, mranquales, Reno Hightower, raider_kin
User avatar
Rainman56
Posts: 12,552
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:28 pm
Location: Underground
Has given High Fives: 548 times
Received High Fives: 367 times

Unread post by Rainman56 »

Sloth_Fratelli wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 12:32 pm Meredith isn’t moving people. If we go by PFF, JPJ had a higher grade at center once he was moved there.
PFF sux ballz.Some guy in bangladesh evaluating players of a sport he's never seen.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rainman56 for the post (total 3):
mranquales, dred, The Real CK
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,447
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 462 times
Received High Fives: 556 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

Attyla wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 1:35 pm it is a tool, and like any tool, you have to use it properly.
I disagree that it's a tool. It's certainly marketed as one. But it's no different than posting someone else's opinion and saying "See I told you guys this player is good/sucks"

I followed and subscribed PFF for quite some time because I'm a stat junkie. Then they put the stats behind a massive paywall and introduced this "rating" which combines stats with subjective analysis. You're simply parroting someone else's opinion as fact with PFF ratings. They do not reflect the reality on the field whatsoever. And honestly just reading the box score is a better use of one's time.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoThanksSir for the post:
mranquales
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,460
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 881 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

User avatar
powski
Posts: 411
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 217 times
Received High Fives: 129 times
Contact:

Unread post by powski »

LayneStaley wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 1:51 pm JPJ obviously did something we don’t know about. Why is he the only one in competition for a starting spot when the other 3 interior guys are ass?
If Pete is holding some kind of grudge and doesn't care that it hurts the team then screw him. To not even entertain the thought of placing him back at his primary position makes no sense to me. Did he forget how to play Center? I don't think so. If he was incapable of Center responsibilities it would have been exposed his rookie year. Meredith was good at Guard last year. JPJ was at least average at Center in 24 and one would assumed he'd get better with more experience. They made the change and now we are worse and that's the way it's gonna be? I don't get it at all.
These users gave a High Five to the author powski for the post (total 4):
mranquales, Reno Hightower, LayneStaley, dred
Post Reply