Ashton Jeanty

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,261
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 810 times
Received High Fives: 1057 times

Ashton Jeanty

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, Steve007
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,687
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 41 times
Received High Fives: 1422 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Oaktownonly wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 3:06 pm The O-line will be better this year just by the presence of real coaching. Even if we were to have the exact same line as last year they would be better. Brennan Carroll was a joke as O-line coach.
Geno and poor qb play too, its not coincidence Seattle's line held up much better without him back there.
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,069
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 266 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

Oaktownonly wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 3:06 pm The O-line will be better this year just by the presence of real coaching. Even if we were to have the exact same line as last year they would be better. Brennan Carroll was a joke as O-line coach.
Agreed. Talent was an issue and injuries were an issue… but without question these guys were coached down. Even beyond Brennan, we paid a boatload for Chip Kelly… and made him Run Pete’s ancient offence.
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 373 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 4:17 pm more back handed attacks ...hahahahaha so thin skinned
I tried to warn you when you first got on the forum lol
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post:
mstrbass2000
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 373 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 2):
Xramfan, Dr Death
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 63 times
Received High Fives: 201 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:36 am A lot of possibilities but so little concrete evidence that the line will be better at this point. It is so clear to all of us what a priority this is, that it is a no-brainer for the new management too. We can hope that the new folks are a lot smarter, experienced, and wise than prior regimes. I was not impressed with Glaze last year and there is that glaring stat of "pressures allowed." Grant and Rogers are basically unknown today and I'm sure that coaches will be working hard on revealing their potential or are they just more high draft choices to fail with the Raiders.
When Rodgers started playing at RG late in the season; he actually got good scores from PFF.com; as for Grant; like you said; he still unknown
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 413 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

....as bad as we all know Brendan Carroll is, for perspective, I thought that it would be interesting to see who, other than Pete, would hire Pete's son to be a coach on an NFL team, and what would they hire him to do.....and then I realize that I really could give a sh.... as long as he is far away from our team.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,365
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1062 times
Received High Fives: 590 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

SuperRaider wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 12:22 am When Rodgers started playing at RG late in the season; he actually got good scores from PFF.com; as for Grant; like you said; he still unknown
I am far from a fan of PFF and their scores. Hopefully Rodgers is for real. That being said, I would not want to put all the eggs in that basket given such a small sample size. We still have major question marks with our OL. OL should be priority #1 with our 2nd rd pick.
User avatar
MexicanHulk
The AssassinThe Tooz
Posts: 2,145
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 516 times
Received High Fives: 220 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

RI RAIDER wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 6:52 am I am far from a fan of PFF and their scores. Hopefully Rodgers is for real. That being said, I would not want to put all the eggs in that basket given such a small sample size. We still have major question marks with our OL. OL should be priority #1 with our 2nd rd pick.
The eggs aren’t all in that basket. The IOL is Linderbaum, top tier starter. The other OG spot is JPJ, quality starter when on the field, with potential as top tier starter. Rogers, looked solid as rookie in the 6 games he played. With crap coaching & scheme. Plus you have Meredith who looked pretty good as a starter, at guard (not C) the year before, backing up. Plus Burford as another backup guard, who played well before when healthy. So yeah, the eggs aren’t all in the Rogers basket. Altho, it wouldn’t be a bad spot to be in if they were. Rogers was a good starting OG prospect who showed why he was considered that, last season.

IMO, IOL is far down the list of needs for this team now. There’s at least 5 positions above IOL as needs.
These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Goodtimes333
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,261
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 810 times
Received High Fives: 1057 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

MexicanHulk wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 9:59 am The eggs aren’t all in that basket. The IOL is Linderbaum, top tier starter. The other OG spot is JPJ, quality starter when on the field, with potential as top tier starter. Rogers, looked solid as rookie in the 6 games he played. With crap coaching & scheme. Plus you have Meredith who looked pretty good as a starter, at guard (not C) the year before, backing up. Plus Burford as another backup guard, who played well before when healthy. So yeah, the eggs aren’t all in the Rogers basket. Altho, it wouldn’t be a bad spot to be in if they were. Rogers was a good starting OG prospect who showed why he was considered that, last season.

IMO, IOL is far down the list of needs for this team now. There’s at least 5 positions above IOL as needs.
qb,wr,nt,safety,cb
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,366
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2718 times
Received High Fives: 1190 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 10:26 am qb,wr,nt,safety,cb
NT, OT, CB, S.

I exclude QB cuz we gonna draft Mendo. OT is a much greater need than WR.
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post (total 2):
Goodtimes333, mstrbass2000
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,462
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 878 times
Received High Fives: 1735 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

BPA when it’s our pick regardless of position
User avatar
RickRyb
The Assassin
Posts: 1,597
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1151 times
Received High Fives: 438 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

raider_kin wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 12:50 pm NT, OT, CB, S.

I exclude QB cuz we gonna draft Mendo. OT is a much greater need than WR.
I have a feeling that Kubiak, Spytek and Dennison feel they already have the players they need for the O-line. 4th round may be the first round where they'll select an O-lineman. Round 2, probably a nose tackle. Round 3, a wide receiver. Or vice-versa.

***shrug*** quien sabe
These users gave a High Five to the author RickRyb for the post (total 3):
MexicanHulk, raider_kin, dred
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,365
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1062 times
Received High Fives: 590 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

MexicanHulk wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 9:59 am The eggs aren’t all in that basket. The IOL is Linderbaum, top tier starter. The other OG spot is JPJ, quality starter when on the field, with potential as top tier starter. Rogers, looked solid as rookie in the 6 games he played. With crap coaching & scheme. Plus you have Meredith who looked pretty good as a starter, at guard (not C) the year before, backing up. Plus Burford as another backup guard, who played well before when healthy. So yeah, the eggs aren’t all in the Rogers basket. Altho, it wouldn’t be a bad spot to be in if they were. Rogers was a good starting OG prospect who showed why he was considered that, last season.

IMO, IOL is far down the list of needs for this team now. There’s at least 5 positions above IOL as needs.
I did say OL and there are question marks. Sure we got our #1 target in Linderbaum (and he was a must have). Sure we will have better coaching. However, JPJ is an obvious injury risk (as much as most of us love him). Rogers has a very small sample size. Hopefully he pans out but I do not think he has shown enough to make him some sort of guarantee. Glaze is an obvious weak spot. The trenches are how to build a team. Considering how much we have invested in offense, I would hope that we spend that 2nd pick on OL. I will not even comment about Meredith or Burford because you are far more optimistic in your assessment of them than I am. Again, I hope you are right, but I do not see it. I think OL is priority 1.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
MexicanHulk
The AssassinThe Tooz
Posts: 2,145
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 516 times
Received High Fives: 220 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

RI RAIDER wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 1:12 pm I did say OL and there are question marks. Sure we got our #1 target in Linderbaum (and he was a must have). Sure we will have better coaching. However, JPJ is an obvious injury risk (as much as most of us love him). Rogers has a very small sample size. Hopefully he pans out but I do not think he has shown enough to make him some sort of guarantee. Glaze is an obvious weak spot. The trenches are how to build a team. Considering how much we have invested in offense, I would hope that we spend that 2nd pick on OL. I will not even comment about Meredith or Burford because you are far more optimistic in your assessment of them than I am. Again, I hope you are right, but I do not see it. I think OL is priority 1.
I’m definitely more optimistic on those players because of the film study done on them. Plus their track record of actually playing well (Burford/Meredith in the NFL for a full season & Rogers in college & the 6 games as a pro). & I’m not saying they’re guarantees or anything but, it’s an overall good situation to roll with. Meredith/Burford are absolutely very good as backup options.

OT if Grant is viewed as a RT by the coaches, then I feel solid about the tackle room as well. Again, Glaze was ok under solid coaching &, bad last year under crap. So I’m ok with him as the backup, not the 1st stringer with nothing behind him. Grant with Glaze as a backup, I’m good with. Plus I’d still draft a developmental OT on day 3 so, Glaze is more of OG backup than OT. Then the guard spot is even better. To me, OT isnt really a need. Unless you’re gonna release/trade Miller next year. Then you wanna groom someone for next year &, have Grant+rookie as the starting OTs.

So yeah, im just more confident in the talent evaluation of Rogers/Grant as starters &, Meredith/Glaze/Burford as backups than you are &, not as pessimistic.

At some point you’re gonna have to believe in the talent+coaching you brought in &, draft other positions, filling out the roster. Not keep overloading one spot.
These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post (total 2):
Goodtimes333, mstrbass2000
User avatar
MexicanHulk
The AssassinThe Tooz
Posts: 2,145
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 516 times
Received High Fives: 220 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 10:26 am qb,wr,nt,safety,cb
QB is Fernando.

For me it goes DTx2, FS, WR, CB, LB (coverage LB).

Those are the pressing needs. Then more OL & backup RB on day 3. I’d never be mad at extra high end trench players tho. So a day 2 pick at OL, even tho I like where it’s at, I wouldnt be mad at.
These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post (total 2):
Goodtimes333, mstrbass2000
Post Reply