Bosa has an ACL - trade Maxx to the 49ers?

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,368
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 759 times

Bosa has an ACL - trade Maxx to the 49ers?

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Someone posted in a thread after our loss that we should trade Maxx Crosby for a bunch of (needed) draft picks, thereby increasing our odds of picking at or near the top of the draft in 2026. As we all know, the 49ers just lost a key player on their defense -- after Fred Warner he is their most important defensive player -- and their d-line is not that deep and full of young players. And, the 49ers are in first place in the NFC West and will likely be battling for a playoff spot this season.

At first blush, I am against trading the best player we have drafted in what 25 years. But, in my frustration with the whole damn thing, I am thinking about this. The trade deadline is early November, so you likely will want to see if Carroll and staff can get this bad act together, but unless we start looking a lot better, there will be talk of trades and even, gasp, "tanking." Thoughts?
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 10:41 am Dunno man, I see value in the rah rah stuff and to be quite honest, while Maxx got paid and such, you can see that he plays for more than just the cash. Passion can be infectious and one guy can change the entire culture.
The only thing that is infectious my friend is winning.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,655
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1238 times
Received High Fives: 2961 times

Unread post by Attyla »

From what I am hearing more and more, it is a moot point.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,460
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 881 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

I saw JPJ on a trade big board at number 10 with potential suitors being Houston and Cleveland for a 4th rounder. Now I’m sure there’s no actual basis to this but if that happens with how bad our line is I want an honest answer from someone with the Raiders as to why they hate the guy.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post (total 3):
Oaktownonly, raider_kin, Dr Death
User avatar
Oaktownonly
Posts: 3,751
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
Has given High Fives: 455 times
Received High Fives: 449 times

Unread post by Oaktownonly »

If true then this staff is so f[raiders_icon]cking stupid. We need offensive linemen so let's trade away offensive linemen. WTF!!!
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,655
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1238 times
Received High Fives: 2961 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Hearing the staff has lost the locker room. All three groups have basically started dialing it in.
User avatar
DeathStar24
Posts: 1,109
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
Location: PA
Has given High Fives: 58 times
Received High Fives: 186 times

Unread post by DeathStar24 »

Attyla wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 12:43 pm Hearing the staff has lost the locker room. All three groups have basically started dialing it in.
Didn't most if not all media pundits say Pete would at least install a "culture" here? This thing couldn't have gone more sideways if they tried. This is when i revert back to thinking this franchise is cursed.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,655
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1238 times
Received High Fives: 2961 times

Unread post by Attyla »

DeathStar24 wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 12:50 pm Didn't most if not all media pundits say Pete would at least install a "culture" here? This thing couldn't have gone more sideways if they tried. This is when i revert back to thinking this franchise is cursed.
You gotta imagine that losing is a lot of it but nobody can be happy with an offense like we just threw out there. When KC taps the brakes on you during a game vs the Raiders at home, you know you are a shit show.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Like I said, the only thing that cures a bad culture is winning. Not passion, not rah rah. Winning.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
DeathStar24
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,681
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 455 times

Unread post by heavyD »

Attyla wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:39 am Hearing more chatter that the meeting did in fact happen and all parties were in agreement that Maxx is not getting traded. This meeting took place yesterday per what I am hearing.
Confirmed by The Athletic today.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,655
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1238 times
Received High Fives: 2961 times

Unread post by Attyla »

I thought you said that but it was money
User avatar
tatalalicious
Posts: 1,163
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:43 pm
Has given High Fives: 78 times
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by tatalalicious »

heavyD wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:17 pm Confirmed by The Athletic today.
I didn't know Crosby possibly being traded was a thing until today. Thought the team would win more games/ be much improved but I was clearly overly optimistic. I like Crosby especially as a guy who is the embodiment of what it use to mean to be a Raider. But, I know this is a controversial opinion, I wouldn't mind them trading him for the right compensation.
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,681
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 455 times

Unread post by heavyD »

It wasn’t a thing. The team had a meeting with him just to clarify that yes teams are calling, but they have not been shopping him and are not trading him.
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,747
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 626 times
Received High Fives: 1054 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Attyla wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 12:43 pm Hearing the staff has lost the locker room. All three groups have basically started dialing it in.
Sad if true. Especially this fast into the season but with the way the team has looked it wouldn't surprise me
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,460
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 881 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »



Do it.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
Oaktownonly
User avatar
srv5490
Posts: 3,471
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:14 pm
Location: Returning Videotapes
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 168 times

Unread post by srv5490 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:09 am Bradley Chubb and Von Miller weren't premier pass rushers? Miller himself helped the Rams win a super bowl that year.
LOL, I specifically stated "when they were traded". Miller was 32 when he was traded, and not the player he was when he was a premier pass rusher. Chubb had a premier rookie season, but hasn't produced anything close to that since. Neither was premier when they were traded.
BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:09 amAnd Mack was better in his prime then Maxx is now which is why he went for two fcking 1sts and why i left him off.
Again, LOL. Only you would think it is valid to leave him off the list when he was a premier pass rusher, but include him when he was no longer that player. I'm sure that makes sense to you, but anyone with any critical thinking skills understands that you left him off because it didn't fit your narrative.

BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:09 amMack was in the same tier then as Parsons, Watt and Garrett are now. And Maxx is not.
The first few sources I Googled disagree with that:

ESPN survey of NFL execs, coaches, and scouts rank him at 4th, just behind those three.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/455 ... n-rankings

Fox Sports had him tied for third with Parsons.
https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/2 ... d-rankings
BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:09 amImagine not having a clue of the NFL outside of Raider land.
This from the guy who told us all summer how the OL was fine. LOL again.
BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:09 am Your precious Maxx isn't worth two 1sts. I know you like to stalk my posts but you should do some research before you open your mouth.
a) I never said he was worth that - I was just calling you out for using lame comparisons.
b) I'm not a huge Maxx guy. He's probably the best player on the roster, but they could trade away the entire roster for all I care.
c) I don't stalk your posts, I call you out for flinging poop around at other members here - I have a low tolerance for childish keyboard warriors.
d) I don't think you have any understanding of what research, or analytical thinking is.
These users gave a High Five to the author srv5490 for the post (total 4):
Hellbound, GoodTimeCharlie, rcraider, FLORIDARAYDAH
Post Reply