I Broke the Code...

[riseNraid09]

... and I am deciding to share it with you guys. You can call it crazy, or nonsense, but to me, this shit is undeniable. What exactly does this imply about the NFL? I'm not entirely sure... but, it's certainly not nothing.

I have noticed on multiple occassions in the recent years that the outcome of NFL games, and specifically player production, have reflected the date the game took place in some way. It happened enough to make me question whether it could have been a coincidence, but never found anything consistent. Using the games from Sunday, October 12 2025, I may have pinpointed how this numerical code (gematria) is being integrated into the game through players that align with the date, as those players are the ones that will score touchdowns and ultimately influence the score.

So, October 12th - 10/12 - (*zeroes do not have value in gematria, therefore they are not recognized whatsoever. 10 is 1, 20 is 2, and so forth.) So, if you add the number that is the month, with the number that is the day... (10 = 1 + 12 = 13) 13 is the main key number that will be associated with each game, primarily through the winner. However, the summation of the digits within the date sometimes elude to the players who will ultimately have the most impact within the games. For example, the number 4 is also a key number, which is the sum of all the single digits that make up the date (10 = 1 + 1 + 2 = 4) So for example, players who wear the number 4 are typically involved, and score. Even thought it's outside of the rules of gematria, it's important to note that if you give value to zero and simply add 10 and 12 together, the number 22 also has some relevance.

This code always applied to the WINNER, meaning each winning team will be associated with the number 13 by adding the numbers of the players who scored together. Keep in mind, when applying gematria code, you simplify everything to one number. Therefore, players with double-digit jersey numbers, add the digits together until you have a single digit. The losing team typically fits the code through one of the key numbers, unless they just don't score.

Here are examples of the code woven into the games from Sunday...


*** KEY NUMBERS: 13 - 4 - 22 ***

I'll start off by saying the early game between the Broncos and Jets are not on this list because there was hardly any scoring at all, but the Broncos were victorious putting up 13 points...

LAR v BAL (W: Rams)
--------------------------
Rams TD's: Kyren Williams (#23 / 2 + 3 = 5) - Tyler Higbee (#89 / 8 + 9 = 17 / 1 + 7 = 8) - So, 5 + 8 = 13.

Baltimore scored only 3.

DAL v CAR (W: Panthers)
-----------------------------
Cowoys TD's: George Pickens (#3) - Jake Ferguson (#87 / 8 + 7 = 15 / 1 + 5 = 6) - Hunter Luepke (#40 / 40 = 4) - So, 3 + 6 + 4 = 13.

Panthers TD's: Rico Dowdle (#5) - Tetairoa McMillan (#4 - Scored 2 TD's / 4 + 4 = 8) - So, 5 + 8 = 13

ARI v IND (W: Colts)
------------------------
Colts TD's: Jonathon Taylor (#28 / 2 + 8 = 10 / 10 = 1) - Daniel Jones ( #17 - Rush TD / 1 + 7 = 8) - Tyler Warren (#84 / 8 + 4 = 12 / 1 + 2 = 3) - Josh Downs (#1) - So, 1 + 8 + 3 + 1 = 13

Cardinals TD's: Jacoby Brissett (#7) - Zonovan Knight (#20 / 20 = 2) - Greg Dortch (#4) - So, 7 + 2 + 4 = 13. Trey McBride also scored a TD but seemed to be an outlier. Usually when key players are outliers, it is because they coincide with the key number on their own via their jersey number or stat line... and he is (#85 / 8 + 5 = 13)

SEA v JAX (W: Seahawks)
-----------------------------
Seahawks TD's: Jaxon Smith-Niigba (#11 / 1 + 1 = 2) - Cooper Kupp (#10 / 10 = 1) - Sam Darnold (#14 / 1 + 4 = 5 - Threw 2 TD's) - So, 2 + 1 + 5 + 5 = 13.

Jaguars TD's: Brian Thomas Jr. (#7) - Tim Patrick (#17 / 1 + 7 = 8) - Trevor Lawrence (#16 / 1 + 6 = 7) - So, 7 + 8 + 7 = 22. (Losing team, different key number.)

LAC v MIA (W: Chargers)
-----------------------------
Chargers TD's: Kimani Vidal (#30 / 30 = 3) - Ladd McConkey (#15 / 1 + 5 = 6) - Justin Herbert (#10 - Threw 2 TD's / 10 + 10 = 20 / 20 = 2) These were the only players to record TD's, and the summation is only 11. However, since the Chargers won, I figured it had to fit somehow. Cameron Dicker hit 5 FG's, and was the only other player to score points. Dicker wears (#11 / 1 + 1 = 2) and would of course bring the total to 13.

Dolphins TD's: Devon Achane (#28 - Scored 2 TD's / 2 + 8 = 10 x 2 = 20 / 20 = 2) - Darren Waller (#83 / 8 + 3 = 11) - So, 2 + 11 = 13

CLE v PIT (W: Steelers)
---------------------------
Steelers TD's: DK Metcalf (#4) - Connor Heyward (#11 / 1 + 1 = 2) - Aaron Rodgers (#8 - Threw 2 TD's / 8 x 2 = 16 / 1 + 6 = 7) - So, 4 + 2 + 7 = 13.

Cleveland only scored 9, No TDs.

NE v NO (W: Patriots)
--------------------------
Patriots TD's: Kayshon Boutte (#9) - DeMario Douglas (#3) - Drake Maye (#10 / 10 = 1) - So, 9 + 3 + 1 = 13

Saints only scored once.

TEN v LV (W: Raiders)
--------------------------
Raiders TD's: Michael Mayer (#87 / 8 + 7 = 15 / 1 + 5 = 6) - Geno Smith (#7) - So, 6 + 7 = 13.
Ashton Jeanty also scored a TD and seems to be an outlier. As I said, jersey number or stat line, and he rushed for 75 yards to go with the 1 TD, so if you add 7 + 5 + 1 = 13.

Titans only scored once.

SF v TB (W: Bucs)
--------------------
Bucs TD's: Kameron Johnson (#19 / 1 + 9 = 10 / 10 = 1) - Tez Johnson (#15 / 1 + 5 = 6) - Baker Mayfield (#6) - So, 1 + 6 + 6 = 13. That's just the QB and the scoring WR's. I will note that the RB's Rachaad White (#1) and Sean Tucker (#44) each scored as well, and the formula is there if you add them in, it's just a tad different. If you add Mayfield (6) and Tez Johnson (6) together, and get 12, and then dilute that down to a single digit, you get 3. Then you would add Kam Johnson (1), White (1), and Tucker (4 + 4 = 8) you would then get 13.

49ers only scored once.

CIN v GB (W: Packers)
--------------------------
Bengals TD's: Tanner Hudson (#87 / 8 + 7 = 15 / 1 + 5 = 6) - Joe Flacco (#16 / 1 + 6 = 7) - So, 6 + 7 = 13.
Jamarr Chase also scored a TD, and he seems to be an outlier, but his stats again reflect the date. His receiving yardage was in fact 94 yards, and obviously 9 + 4 = 13.

Packers TD's: Josh Jacobs (#8) - Tucker Kraft (#85 / 8 + 5 = 13 / 1 + 3 = 4) - Jordan Love (#10 / 10 = 1) - So, 8 + 4 + 1 = 13.

DET v KC (W: Chiefs)
------------------------
Chiefs TD's: Hollywood Brown (#5) - Xavier Worthy (#1) - Patrick Mahomes (#15 - Pass TD & Rush TD / 1 + 5 = 6) This one is a bit different, but defintely fits. Since Mahomes scored via the air and on the ground, you count the 6 twice (6 + 6 = 12) And then you can combo that with either Worthy (#1) which makes 13, or Hollywood Brown who had 2 receiving TD's (#5 / 5 x 2 = 10 / 10 = 1) So, of course that would be 13 as well.

Lions TD's: Sam LaPorta (#87 / 8 + 7 = 15 / 1 + 5 = 6) - Jared Goff (#16 / 1 + 6 = 7) - So, 6 + 7 = 13.
Jameson Williams seems to be an outlier like Jamarr Chase was, and ironically, wears the same number (#1) and the number 13 is in his stats from this contest as well. Williams had 66 yards, 1 TD. So, 6 + 6 + 1 = 13.

---

On Monday Night, the key number in focus was 14, and the Atlanta Falcons won, and had both Robinson (#7) and Allgeier (#25 / 2 + 5 = 7) score TD's. 7 + 7 = 14. Threw the air, Penix (#9) threw a TD to London (#5)... 9 + 5 = 14.

I mean, fast-forward to the Thursday Night game between the Bengals and the Steelers, and it's the same thing. The date was 10/16, so the main key number is going to be 17 here.

PIT v CIN (W: Bengals)
---------------------------
Bengals TD's: Noah Fant (#86 / 8 + 6 = 14 / 1 + 4 = 5) - Tee Higgins (#5) - Joe Flacco (#16 / 1 + 6 = 7) - So, 5 + 5 + 7 = 17.
Again, Jamarr Chase was an outlier, but his stats reflected that numbers within the date. On the 16th, he had 16 receptions, 161 yards... and obviously the TD. If you add all the digits from his receptions total, yard total, and touchdowns ( 1 + 6 = 7 / 1 + 6 + 1 = 8 -- 8 + 7 = 15, plus the 1 TD, that equals 16... All on the 16th. As I said, outlier from the gematria formula, but his lone production heavily reflected the date. (16 catches for 161 on the 16th? Really?)

Steelers obviously lost, but their output still aligned with the date, just a bit differently. Even though the key number is 17 due to adding the month/day together, the fact that it was the 16th was very present. Also, if you add all the single digits in 10/16 together, you get 8. Aaron Rodgers is obviously (#8), and had a 4 TD performance. Freiermuth was the top receiver and had 2 TD's, he wears (#88 / 8 + 8 = 16.) The other two players to score were Jonnu Smith (#81 / 8 + 1 = 9) and Darnell Washington (#80 / 80 = 8) So, you add those remaining players together, you get 17. All fitting the numbers aligned with the date somehow, some way.

I am currently reviewing all the Sunday games etc. from Week 7 to see how they align, but just from a glance, I can already see multiple instances where this remains true. I even placed bets on a few players who aligned with key numbers from last week, 10 and 11, and I hit... Johnathon Taylor, Michael Pittman Jr., and Tyler Warren... all three scored TD's.

[Attyla]

6.02 X 10 to the 23rd...

I broke another code. The answer is three


you are welcome

[FLORIDARAYDAH]

I broke another code. The answer is three


you are welcome

That makes much more sense than the first one

[Sold My Soul]

They once called Einstein mad.

[Cruisin with Tooz]

The code was broken long ago. Mossad agent, Jim Morrison, was passing it on to his contact in the audience in Mar 1969, when CIA agents, disguised as Miami Dade's finest nabbed him on stage before he could deliver the key line in LA Woman. The code was finally released 13 years later in the May issue of Playboy magazine as a microdot on the right nipple of Kim Malin, the Playmate of the Month, in her centerfold.

[Attyla]

yea, that is not weird or anything

[riseNraid09]

They once called Einstein mad.

yuppp. exactly. new ideas that force you to consider a different perspective are almost always met with resistance...



look y'all, whether you choose to believe it or not, this information is valid.

hmm, let's see... the playoff game between San Francisco and Seattle...

the game obviously took place on (01.17) so, add all the numbers together that make up the date (1 + 1 + 7)... you get 9.
Kenneth Walker III in gematria is... no way, look at that... 9. and, no kidding!? he also wears the number 9! anddd who was the f[raiders_icon]cking star of the game with like, what?... 150 yards and 3 touchdowns??!?! Kenneth. Walker. the III.

why? its because he aligned with the dateeeeeee. you can obviously ignore it, but the evidence is overwhelming.

[Attyla]

They once called Einstein mad.

no, no one ever called him mad. They thought he was eccentric because of how he wore his hair and not wearing socks and such. But his math was never considered crazy. As a matter of fact, while his math challenged the widely accepted norms of physics, he was actually considered rather revolutionary in his calculations. Unlike this crap we are reading from the OP (no offense OP, but it is crap)

The notion that Einstein was ever considered crazy is more optics than truth. Just like the long held legend that he failed math. He did not, he excelled at math. He also never said “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” and many other things attributed to him.

[Attyla]

yuppp. exactly. new ideas that force you to consider a different perspective are almost always met with resistance...



look y'all, whether you choose to believe it or not, this information is valid.

hmm, let's see... the playoff game between San Francisco and Seattle...

the game obviously took place on (01.17) so, add all the numbers together that make up the date (1 + 1 + 7)... you get 9.
Kenneth Walker III in gematria is... no way, look at that... 9. and, no kidding!? he also wears the number 9! anddd who was the fcking star of the game with like, what?... 150 yards and 3 touchdowns??!?! Kenneth. Walker. the III.

why? its because he aligned with the dateeeeeee. you can obviously ignore it, but the evidence is overwhelming.

I once played a game. I wore number 11. Add 1+1 and you get 2. I assisted in two goals. It was on the second of February. Wow, it works!!

[Xramfan]

So today Josiah Stewart of the rams will make game changing plays or Luther Burden 111 is going to wreak havoc over the rams?

Just getting my math and date numbers in order

1/18
1+1+8=10

[riseNraid09]

I once played a game. I wore number 11. Add 1+1 and you get 2. I assisted in two goals. It was on the second of February. Wow, it works!!

there you go... you're getting it. lol.

but seriously, I benefited greatly from seeing the connection with Walker in that particular game, and placed bets accordingly. are we really just going to act like what happened with Walker isn't exactly what I have been saying? I honestly don't understand how this is so easily dismissed... I have given countless examples proving my point. it's certainly not mere coincidence. Perhaps, it's more of what the idea suggests, rather than the idea itself. An idea like this one, if adopted, obviously alters ones perception of the NFL and I get that most of you older gentleman probably don't like that as football is a beloved sport to us all and therefore it's easier just to disregard it completely.

Anyway, I realize it's a complicated concept to just dump in a post on a message board. I didn't expect for anyone to just accept this information, but then again, I guarantee there aren't many individuals who are going to be able to see such a thing.

[riseNraid09]

So today Josiah Stewart of the rams will make game changing plays or Luther Burden 111 is going to wreak havoc over the rams?

Just getting my math and date numbers in order

1/18
1+1+8=10

You are correct, 10 ( 1 ) is the number, and that's why Kyren Williams scored both of the Rams touchdowns...

Kyren Williams is #23, 2 + 3 = 5... he scored twice, so 5 + 5 = 10.

when a particular number is in focus, they will typically use players wearing multiples of that number (I am assuming for the sake of summation)... so, in this instance, 10... 5 is obviously a number they will likely look to utilize.

Just because a player wears the exact number that is in focus, such as Burden wearing #10, doesn't mean they immediately benefit. there are other factors. I identify any players that have a strong connection to the game, whether that be through the date (typically their name will be the same number.), or that player playing back in his hometown, or the state/city in which they attended college. (examples from this season off the top of my head... when Puka had that huge game against the Seahawks in Seattle? The date equated to the number 3, Puka Nacua in gematria is 3, and he wears #12, again equating to 3. On top of that, he was playing in Seattle, and he obviously attended college at the University of Washington. Same exact thing when Kyle Pitts had that huge 3 TD game in Tampa against the Bucs... Pitts obviously attended the University of Florida.) Doing this allows me to at least identify one player that should score... and knowing that all scoring players have to equate to a specific number, I can further identify which players will provide sufficient production.

I realize this is highly complex, but I have been studying it for months and I see it without looking now. I know this idea is not a popular one because of what it suggests about the NFL, but it is a very useful tool in terms of sports betting.


... so yeah, im a genius. you guys are welcome.

[352Raider]

f[raiders_icon]ck ya this is gonna be my retirement supplement!

[Rabidraider]

Meth, the drug of numerologists...

[Attyla]

Meth, the drug of numerologists...

make sure you carry the one and show your work.

[Cruisin with Tooz]

Trump is president #47 and Iran's regime is in its 47th year. Coincidence? I think not.