Raiders set to release QB Geno Smith after 1 season in Las Vegas

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,681
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 452 times

Raiders set to release QB Geno Smith after 1 season in Las Vegas

Unread post by heavyD »

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/708979 ... iders-nfl/

Should surprise nobody as he would be a horrible mentor for Mendoza. While Raiders fans should be eternally greatful that Geno was so terrible that the Raiders finally finished 32, this guy won't be missed. Raiders have had a lot of terrible QB's over the years but he's by far the least likeable of the lot. Whether he was on the sidelines looking dejected and mopy, or flipping the bird to fans, he came off extremely unlikeable and the fact is that he was one of the very worst QB's in 2025. Good riddance!
These users gave a High Five to the author heavyD for the post (total 4):
rich72, raider_kin, rhumbob, 352Raider
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,762
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 370 times
Received High Fives: 858 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

TG that POS will be gone...you couldn't trade the Sloth for a used condom!!!!
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,681
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 452 times

Unread post by heavyD »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:22 am The Raiders wouldnt want anything of value. The value is less dead cap hit. Something like Geno+ our 7th round pick for a 7th round pick.
It's not about what other teams would be giving up of value and what they would get in return which is Geno's contract. There are teams that may want Geno on their roster as a backup but not at $27 million. Once he's released then teams will offer him $10 million or so to be a backup or challenge for the starting job if it's say a team like the Vikings and their incumbent QB isn't very good. You need to understand that no team will want to pay Geno Smith $27 million in 2026 as the reason he's not tradable.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,732
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 226 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Attyla wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:34 am Dead money is not an issue. And the 8M cap space is worth getting his butt off the team
Dead money and cap space is always an issue. Even if you dont need to use it, you can carry it over to next year. And he will be off the team either way. I prefer he be off with 13 M extra cap space than 8 M extra cap space. Its worth it to find out if there is a taker. If not, then cut him before the other 8 million vests.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,070
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2097 times
Received High Fives: 2807 times

Unread post by chucker »

I would convert all but $5 million of his salary to a roster bonus and then release him after that. Then if he gets more than $5 million to play for another team the raiders would get $5 million in cash and cap as an offset. Otherwise he’ll definitely just end up signing a minimum deal and all they’ll get as an offset is about $1.2 million.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
Jeevo
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

The Raiders now have 96-97 million in cap space. Now cut Cappa and have a smooth 100! There was a lot of truly awful picks thrown this year. Set the defense up for abject failure
User avatar
raiders72
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 4:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 88 times

Unread post by raiders72 »

Good riddance and again “Thanks Pete”

Wilson next!
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,732
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 226 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

heavyD wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:44 am It's not about what other teams would be giving up of value and what they would get in return which is Geno's contract. There are teams that may want Geno on their roster as a backup but not at $27 million. Once he's released then teams will offer him $10 million or so to be a backup or challenge for the starting job if it's say a team like the Vikings and their incumbent QB isn't very good. You need to understand that no team will want to pay Geno Smith $27 million in 2026 as the reason he's not tradable.
Its not 27 million. You dont understand the process. The Raiders would convert a portion of his salary (eg 13 million) into a bonus, then trade him. The Raiders take the cap hit for 13 million instead of the18.5 cap hit they would take by cutting him. The acquiring team takes the cap hit for the redone salary, 13.5 million.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,614
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1221 times
Received High Fives: 2934 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:46 am Dead money and cap space is always an issue. Even if you dont need to use it, you can carry it over to next year. And he will be off the team either way. I prefer he be off with 13 M extra cap space than 8 M extra cap space. Its worth it to find out if there is a taker. If not, then cut him before the other 8 million vests.
Not really, the dead money is very manageable, the cap space is worth kicking a guy who saw the writing on the wall after that last game out of Vegas
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,732
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 226 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

chucker wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:49 am I would convert all but $5 million of his salary to a roster bonus and then release him after that. Then if he gets more than $5 million to play for another team the raiders would get $5 million in cash and cap as an offset. Otherwise he’ll definitely just end up signing a minimum deal and all they’ll get as an offset is about $1.2 million.
Convert 13.5 of the guaranteed 18.5 before the remaining 8 vests? Yes. So they get the 8 million savings + another possible 5. But why not try and trade him for nothing before you cut him? That way you are definitely getting the extra 5.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,732
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 226 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Attyla wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:55 am Not really, the dead money is very manageable, the cap space is worth kicking a guy who saw the writing on the wall after that last game out of Vegas
Reducing the dead money increases the cap space by that amount. Every dollar you reduce the dead cap hit by increases the cap space by 1 dollar. Youre basically saying you want that 8 million in cap space instead of 13 million in cap space.
User avatar
Coach dd 11
Posts: 999
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:18 am
Has given High Fives: 3 times
Received High Fives: 51 times

Unread post by Coach dd 11 »

While I'm no fan of Geno's, most must understand that our FO and staff absolutely f[raiders_icon]cked him from the get go. First, you don't trade for a player (giving up team value) and then pay them ahead of never EARNING anything for your franchise. Sorry but that is just plain f[raiders_icon]cking stupid and typical of why and how our team sucks at this type of stuff. If he didn't believe in himself or the challenge then we should have used the 3rd round pick and rolled with AOC. I'd bet anything we'd be in the same situation with more money and another player. Just f[raiders_icon]cking dumb!
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

Next year the 18 mil dead money is off the cap so it's alright. It's one season of taking the hit
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,357
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 139 times
Received High Fives: 753 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

I questioned the trade, giving up a third round choice, but when we beat New England in the first game of the year, I actually was saying we finally have a starting quarterback that’s decent. Whoops.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 118 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 9:01 am Cant they restructure this years $26 million deal to make a trade palatable to some other team? Maybe a 13 million salary to bonus conversion would get our dead cap down to 13 and the acquiring team would only be on the hook for the other 13?
I think you talk trade first, and then the contract will then probably affect trade return. You don't want to commit to anything without a trade in place. Right now you trade him, it's 26M to the other team. You can always negotiate terms of the salary and return compensation with the other team. "We pay 13, you trade us a a conditional 6th" or whatever.
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 118 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 10:29 am I questioned the trade, giving up a third round choice, but when we beat New England in the first game of the year, I actually was saying we finally have a starting quarterback that’s decent. Whoops.
Old Uncle Petey had us fooled when he said we're competing in 2025. I manipulated my mind to think he would be better inside a dome.
Post Reply