He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,608
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 158 times
Received High Fives: 761 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 5,023
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1597 times
Received High Fives: 1631 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 1:33 pm The way you phrased your premise is a bit off. I think the question youre getting at is, "Does having a dual threat qb help or hurt your chances of winning a SB?" The qb doesnt have to be the actual rush leader that year does he? If 1 qb rushes for 1000 yards and another rushes for 900 and wins the SB, doesnt that count?

#1. Steve Young only won 1 SB. Joe Montana won the other 2. So only 3 SB winning teams had dual threat qbs.
#2. You cant use 60 SBs as the denominator because the dual threat era didnt start until 1990ish with Steve Young. So use 36 as your denominator.
#3. Who are the dual threat qbs? Here's my list:
Lamar Jackson, Michael Vick, Cam Newton, Russell Wilson, Randall Cunningham, Josh Allen, Steve Young, Justin Fields, Kyler Murray, Jalen Hurts and Jayden Daniels. Eleven total spanning 36 years, and prolly shouldnt even include Daniels since he just started playing. So 10 dual threat qbs have won 3 SBs.
#4.And 33 SBs (11 times as many) were won by single threat qbs over the last 36 years.
#5.If there are exactly 110 or 11 times (110 = 11 x 10) as many single threat qbs as dual threat qbs, then having a dual threat qb wouldnt make a difference either way in the chance of winning a SB. If there are less than 11x as many, then having a dual threat qb would be a disadvantage. If there are more than 11x as many, then having a dual threat qb would be an advantage.
#6. How many single threat qbs have played since 1990? More than 110 or less than 110? There are 32 teams. Over the last 36 years has each team on average not had more than 4 different starting qbs? The team with the greatest stability at qb is GB. And they had three (Favre, Rodgers and Love) over the last 30 years. And that doesnt even go back 36 years. On the other side of the spectrum, Cle has had more than 30 different qbs over that span. If you go team by team and add it up, there are >>>>>>>>110 single threat qbs who have been NFL starters since 1990. So, as I wrote, dual threat qbs have won more than their share of SBs.
#7. I wouldnt find it fair if we each slapped down $50, but that's not what happened. Id be fine if you slapped down $80 and I slapped down $20.
I got a little lost in the weeds here, but I’ll tell you what I saw. Part of the reason I commented at all was my transformation as a guy who gets wowed by QB athleticism, to a guy that sees Mendo as the perfect QB, even in this “modern” era where there are more and more QBs who come out with eye-popping combine numbers.

I was impressed by Lamar after his first few seasons. I was wowed by Anthony Richardson at his combine. This year, Taylen Green, meh. Maybe if he ever learns how to stay in the pocket for a bit and throw accurately.

Even looking at the past winning Super Bowl QBs, (I imagine I would come to the same results if I did a better and deeper study), those 3 Super Bowl winners are best described as “Duel-Threat”, like you said, but the “Running QBs” are nowhere to be seen. (And yes, I agree that we’ll need to revisit this in about 20 years.)

We’d have to figure out the numbers that perfectly qualify what a Pocket Passer/Duel Threat/Running QB is, but at first blush, it looks like it’s far better to have a Pocket Passer, than a Duel Threat, and a Running QB gets you excitement, but bupkis on the postseason hardware.

So just to boil it down. Glad we’re getting Mendo, a “pocket passer”, despite his supposed lack of athleticism. And Lamar, is never winning a Super Bowl (and by extension Maxx, for now). By the time even the best-armed “running QBs” learn to properly play in a pocket, the hits they’ve taken on the road to get there have shortened their career enough that it doesn’t matter.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,756
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 230 times
Received High Fives: 511 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:06 pm I got a little lost in the weeds here,
Dual threats qbs have won 3 of 36 SBs in the dual threat era. Thats 8.3%. Dual threat qbs have made up significantly less than 8.3% of qbs. Having a dual threat qb is not an impediment to winning a SB, providing that he is not actually a RB that can complete a pass type of dual threat qb.
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,721
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1236 times
Received High Fives: 2986 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:20 pm Dual threats qbs have won 3 of 36 SBs in the dual threat era. Thats 8.3%. Dual threat qbs have made up significantly less than 8.3% of qbs. Having a dual threat qb is not an impediment to winning a SB, providing that he is not actually a RB that can complete a pass type of dual threat qb.
We are drafting a duel threat, he is talented and smart
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
GoodTimeCharlie, Reno Hightower
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 5,023
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1597 times
Received High Fives: 1631 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Attyla wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:23 pm We are drafting a duel threat, he is talented and smart
Spot on with that. The NFL has gotten so weak-kneed about whether or not a guy qualifies as smart/dumb, but I’d have a lot more interest in the combine if mental attributes were made to be as important as how high a guy can jump.
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, The Silver Pillager
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 902 times
Received High Fives: 2065 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

For QB, the mental is the most important and probably always will be.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 4):
Reno Hightower, Goodtimes333, The Silver Pillager, RickRyb
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,721
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1236 times
Received High Fives: 2986 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:37 pm For QB, the mental is the most important and probably always will be.
I mean Fitzgerald never had the arm talent but he hung around forever because he was smart as f[raiders_icon]ck. Our guy has the arm talent so I expect he is going to kill it
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,188
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 789 times
Received High Fives: 1208 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:37 pm For QB, the mental is the most important and probably always will be.
That's exactly right.

In regards to dual-threat QB's it is how they are defined and how they use their mobility. Jim Plunkett was a dual threat QB earlier in his career. He ran the option under Chuck Fairbanks, even late in his career his mobility while lumbering was effective. Rich Gannon was also a dual-threat QB, so was Elway as was Ben Roethlisberger, Donovan McNabb, so forth...

At some point the game slows down enough for some that they learn to use their mobility in opportunistic situations or to enhance their survivability in a cluttered pocket. The ones that can't make the reads tuck and run as soon as things break down. Game film generally catches up with them or they get injured, either way they do not last.

Most of today's QB's could be considered dual-threat. Mahomes amongst them.
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post (total 4):
FLORIDARAYDAH, BoKnows81, Trainnvain, Viper
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 5,023
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1597 times
Received High Fives: 1631 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Toast wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:54 pm That's exactly right.

In regards to dual-threat QB's it is how they are defined and how they use their mobility. Jim Plunkett was a dual threat QB, even late in his career his mobility while lumbering was effective. Rich Gannon was also a dual-threat QB, so was Elway as was Ben Roethlisberger.

At some point the game slows down enough for some that they learn to use their mobility in opportunistic situations or to enhance their survivability in a cluttered pocket. The ones that can't make the reads tuck and run as soon as things break down. Game film generally catches up with them or they get injured, either way they do not last.

Most of today's QB's could be considered dual-threat. Mahomes amongst them.
We should probably add one more tier in honor of AOC. So…
“Immobile”
“Pocket Passer”
“Dual Threat”
“Running QB”
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
Dank Sinatra
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,756
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 230 times
Received High Fives: 511 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

When you take into account the acquisition cost Bal paid to get Crosby, the effective total cost to them is about 65% higher than his $30 million salary or $50 million/year. And thats if he extends his current salary another 2-3 years. If they dont extend him, its even worse to spread the acquisition cost over 2 years instead of 4. Thats craycray. Im surprised that they jumped FA options.
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,188
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 789 times
Received High Fives: 1208 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 5:04 pm We should probably add one more tier in honor of AOC. So…
“Immobile”
“Pocket Passer”
“Dual Threat”
“Running QB”
LoL-running QB is a euphemism for most Ohio State signal callers. They don't read and react they panic and run.
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post (total 2):
GoodTimeCharlie, Dank Sinatra
User avatar
Dank Sinatra
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 10:34 pm
Location: the Black Hole
Has given High Fives: 11 times
Received High Fives: 4 times

Unread post by Dank Sinatra »

:rofl:
GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 5:04 pm We should probably add one more tier in honor of AOC. So…
“Immobile”
“Pocket Passer”
“Dual Threat”
“Running QB”
These users gave a High Five to the author Dank Sinatra for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,329
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4218 times
Received High Fives: 1117 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

Toast wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 5:08 pm LoL-running QB is a euphemism for most Ohio State signal callers. They don't read and react they panic and run.
Yep. That's why I always say that Buckeye QB's will rarely make it in the NFL. Most are just RB's that play the QB position. Stroud may be the exception.
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,814
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 806 times
Received High Fives: 974 times

Unread post by Viper »

Toast wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:54 pm That's exactly right.

In regards to dual-threat QB's it is how they are defined and how they use their mobility. Jim Plunkett was a dual threat QB earlier in his career. He ran the option under Chuck Fairbanks, even late in his career his mobility while lumbering was effective. Rich Gannon was also a dual-threat QB, so was Elway as was Ben Roethlisberger, Donovan McNabb, so forth...

At some point the game slows down enough for some that they learn to use their mobility in opportunistic situations or to enhance their survivability in a cluttered pocket. The ones that can't make the reads tuck and run as soon as things break down. Game film generally catches up with them or they get injured, either way they do not last.

Most of today's QB's could be considered dual-threat. Mahomes amongst them.
Knowing when to tuck it and run, take the yards and not forcing it is almost a lost art these days. Mahomes is the absolute master at it.
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

Viper wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 6:09 pm Knowing when to tuck it and run, take the yards and not forcing it is almost a lost art these days. Mahomes is the absolute master at it.
Tiptoeing up the sidelines. Always looking for a flag when he gets hit. No one lights him up because it's a guaranteed flag
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 4):
raider_kin, Dr Death, Viper, dred
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,329
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4218 times
Received High Fives: 1117 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 6:28 pm Tiptoeing up the sidelines. Always looking for a flag when he gets hit. No one lights him up because it's a guaranteed flag
The old Raiders wouldn't give two shits about lighting him up. Hit his ass and take the penalty. f[raiders_icon]ck em'.
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post (total 5):
Goodtimes333, Sold My Soul, Rainman56, 352Raider, raiderboyron
Post Reply