Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,359
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 200 times
Received High Fives: 444 times

Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 373 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2026 5:10 pm Oh yea that's clearly evident.

And yea I'm not a Carr fan either but these dudes are obsessed. Dude's been gone for 4 years and we have an ongoing thread with 19,000+ posts.
I've found that the only way I can interact with this forum is with a 5th of Makers Mark & a few ice cubes...just saying;)
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 2):
mstrbass2000, Dr Death
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,261
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 1058 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

pfish57 wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2026 8:27 pm I've found that the only way I can interact with this forum is with a 5th of Makers Mark & a few ice cubes...just saying;)
dark cloud (derek carr) will drive you to drinking, might as well make it a good drink :grin:

big fan of old fashions
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,305
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4288 times
Received High Fives: 1118 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

Wild Turkey Rare Breed... neat... in a Glencairn glass. :grin:
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,644
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2960 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2026 5:10 pm Oh yea that's clearly evident.

And yea I'm not a Carr fan either but these dudes are obsessed. Dude's been gone for 4 years and we have an ongoing thread with 19,000+ posts.
Well, the thread was all but dead in a lower forum when a wildly inaccurate report about him wanting to resurrect his career and further wanted to do it with the Raiders was put out there. And there is that thing about him and David talking nonstop about the Raiders on a podcast. He was the QB of this team for 9 of the strangest years in our history. More shit went down on his watch than any QB we have seen on the roster. I look back at those years and am surprised we don't discuss that shit more. Shit was so crazy we forget that Antonio Brown froze out his feet.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
STHfrontrow
User avatar
STHfrontrow
Posts: 1,023
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 82 times

Unread post by STHfrontrow »

So Carr gets 1 year in Kubiaks system to not be scared to get injured and ball out or career forever nothing/bust. He knows Kubiaks system already and the defense looks improved.

Mendoza gets a year to ride the bench and watch the speed of the game yet be prepared to get in there if Carr goes down.

The idea sounds bad at first thought but maybe getting Kubiak first year as coach along with Mendoza's first year not being thrown to the wolves sounds reasonable. Also, gives Carr a chance to resurrect his stature as a Raiders player overall like Woodson did (not that it's the same).

I'm not advocating for Carr to come back I'm just noticing it might not be a far fetched bad idea.
These users gave a High Five to the author STHfrontrow for the post:
Reno Hightower
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,109
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 767 times
Received High Fives: 1190 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Competent veteran QB's are at a PREMIUM right now. Especially ones that would play for a journeyman's wage. I think one of the factors that made Carr so polarizing (aside from his chokeitus in the Red Zone and 3rd quarter disappearing acts) were the optics of how he carried himself.

That being said he never played as poorly as Garopollo, Geno Smith and others that followed but considering the baggage he would bring and the fact that he is only in his mid 30's would create unneeded drama in the QB room. Plus his brother would say some stupid shit on his talk show. Not that anyone takes him seriously.

That ship has sailed but that fact that it remotely a topic of discussion it is more of a testament to the current veteran QB situation on the free agent market. I wish there was a Josh McCown out there but there isn't. Mariota would have been ideal.

AOC is a competent veteran, Jason Garrett type. Maybe Mendoza lights it up in the pre-season like Carr did in 2014 and makes it a non issue.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,261
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 1058 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

Yes, as of March 2026, the New Orleans Saints still hold the contractual rights to Derek Carr because he retired while under contract with the team. If Carr decides to unretire and return to the NFL, he remains a New Orleans Saint, meaning the team would have to trade him or release him for him to join another team.

imagine the raiders having to give the saints a pick to get derek carr back to the raiders, when it was derek carr whom screwed the raiders out of picks to play for the saints
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
Reno Hightower
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,109
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 767 times
Received High Fives: 1190 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2026 3:47 pm Yes, as of March 2026, the New Orleans Saints still hold the contractual rights to Derek Carr because he retired while under contract with the team. If Carr decides to unretire and return to the NFL, he remains a New Orleans Saint, meaning the team would have to trade him or release him for him to join another team.

imagine the raiders having to give the saints a pick to get derek carr back to the raiders, when it was derek carr whom screwed the raiders out of picks to play for the saints
I definitely would not be a straight forward process as it would to simply sign a veteran. What has Vince Evan's been up to? lol
User avatar
Arsenal Raider
SnakeMad Max
Posts: 1,817
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:40 am
Has given High Fives: 326 times
Received High Fives: 170 times

Unread post by Arsenal Raider »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2026 3:47 pm Yes, as of March 2026, the New Orleans Saints still hold the contractual rights to Derek Carr because he retired while under contract with the team. If Carr decides to unretire and return to the NFL, he remains a New Orleans Saint, meaning the team would have to trade him or release him for him to join another team.

imagine the raiders having to give the saints a pick to get derek carr back to the raiders, when it was derek carr whom screwed the raiders out of picks to play for the saints
If that were to happen, I don't see a trade being necessary. I'd bet on his release.

Doubt he returns to the Raiders though
User avatar
Summerall-Madden
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 9:23 pm
Received High Fives: 1 time

Unread post by Summerall-Madden »

Vince Evans is a grandfather by now! So they will pass!
User avatar
raiderboyron
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:44 am
Location: On the side of Lassen peak in beautiful Shasta Co
Has given High Fives: 362 times
Received High Fives: 183 times

Unread post by raiderboyron »

So, the guy who said "You're gonna stick with that mfer " is gonna agree to let him come back? 🤔
These users gave a High Five to the author raiderboyron for the post (total 2):
rich72, Willmark
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,980
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1559 times
Received High Fives: 1601 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

raiderboyron wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2026 8:29 pm So, the guy who said "You're gonna stick with that mfer " is gonna agree to let him come back? 🤔
:fingerup:
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,673
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 667 times
Received High Fives: 361 times

Unread post by rich72 »

I highly doubt they would ever bring carr back unless its to retire as a Raider, for like 1 day.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,644
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2960 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Why would the Saints release him, they have no reason to do so. If a team wants him, the Saints could just say, give us a day three pick and we will trade his rights to you. Carr has a no trade clause in his contract so he would have to agree, but if he wants back in, he would need to agree and the Saints would want something for him. It is pretty simple actually. The Saints have zero reason just to let him go for nothing.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,075
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2102 times
Received High Fives: 2813 times

Unread post by chucker »

First, Carr is not the right guy for the Raiders and the Raiders' situation doesn't work for him. If he comes back, he wants to be the undisputed starter. So the Raiders' situation doesn't work.

Second, he would make more money than we'd want to spend on a bridge/backup QB - I don't know how much his contract is for in 2026 but I believe it's in the $40 million range. Whether a team is willing to pay that is in question, but I don't believe he'd be willing to return to the NFL unless he's being relatively well paid.

That contract level, however, is the reason that he can probably return without the Saints commanding much, if anything, in trade. If he unretires, his contract resumes. If he unretires and is not traded then the Saints, who already have a new QB, would have to pay him $40 million (or whatever it is). They will let him go to another team and he would likely negotiate all of that, or negotiate a release, prior to taking any action. I suspect that all that would be handled pretty easily without conflict. As long as he isn't going to a team in the NFC South, trade compensation would not be a sticking poing.

Regardless, he's just not the right guy to mentor Mendoza. We need a guy who is truly focused on Mendoza instead of just checking himself out in the mirror all day long.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
RickRyb
Post Reply