2026 Draft - First Round - Thurs.4/23 - 5/8 pm

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 754 times

2026 Draft - First Round - Thurs.4/23 - 5/8 pm

Post by RunOverByHubbard »

99% chance the Raiders start things off with doing what we all want them to do. Less than a 1% chance they trade the pick? Yep. There will be some interesting trades in the first round, including a possibility our new management trades up into the first round using the "extra" picks we have this year. But, I am expecting an evening of observing and anticipating rounds 2 & 3 tomorrow night.

Enjoy one of the best sports events of the year -- the NFL draft.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 3):
Rabidraider, nitroraider, Sufferghost
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,864
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 420 times
Received High Fives: 791 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Rabidraider wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:34 pm He's a reach at 13.
I wonder if they looked into trading down at all.
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,829
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1964 times
Received High Fives: 1203 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:35 pm There's no such thing for a potential franchise QB
He's not a franchise guy IMO. Without a 5th year option most graded him a 2nd rounder.
User avatar
ELCAraiderfan
GhostMad StorkBig Ben
Posts: 3,356
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 848 times
Received High Fives: 413 times

Unread post by ELCAraiderfan »

16 to 88 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:34 pm Ravens are going to take Ioane. Remember, you heard it here first.
No both NFL draft channels said it first and second....but we will give you third
These users gave a High Five to the author ELCAraiderfan for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,187
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 422 times
Received High Fives: 295 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Rams definitely have a need at WR so I'm guessing the plan was because this draft is so deep at that position they are gambling a guy they like will be there at 29.
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,853
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1146 times
Received High Fives: 1025 times

Unread post by Willmark »

MexicanHulk wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:35 pm I'd be all for it too for them. But I wouldn't have done this early for Simpson. I like Simpson but not in the 1st. They shoulda took Nuss, C. Payton or. Allar later.
That was 100% McVay.

They are thinking much further ahead than a lot of others teams certainly us.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

You cant say you would of rather taken this qb or that qb later. If hes your guy, you take him. When will people realize you dont f[raiders_icon]ck around at QB.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
16 to 88, Willmark
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,187
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 422 times
Received High Fives: 295 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

ELCAraiderfan wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:36 pm No both NFL draft channels said it first and second....but we will give you third
I hate it when people call me out on my BS! And forget the participation trophy, can I have some of your silver?
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Rabidraider wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:36 pm He's not a franchise guy IMO. Without a 5th year option most graded him a 2nd rounder.
Yea, im not doubting McVay. They are prepping for life without Stafford. They have no major needs. Love that pick for them.
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,187
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 422 times
Received High Fives: 295 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Bain, from Miami to Tampa
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,979
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1558 times
Received High Fives: 1600 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Bain, not a great hugger.
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
dred
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,187
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 422 times
Received High Fives: 295 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:37 pm You cant say you would of rather taken this qb or that qb later. If hes your guy, you take him. When will people realize you dont f[raiders_icon]ck around at QB.
So true. If they had passed on him the chances are some other team scoops him up.
These users gave a High Five to the author 16 to 88 for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
MexicanHulk
The AssassinThe Tooz
Posts: 2,145
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 514 times
Received High Fives: 220 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:37 pm You cant say you would of rather taken this qb or that qb later. If hes your guy, you take him. When will people realize you dont f[raiders_icon]ck around at QB.
You can absolutely say that. Depends on how high a ceiling is & if you're ok with that. There's lots of variables
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,074
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2100 times
Received High Fives: 2811 times

Unread post by chucker »

I think it was ridiculous that Orlovsky rated Simpson higher than Mendoza but I'm not surprised Simpson went in that range. The Rams aren't going to pick that high very often so I think it's a solid move. I'll also trust McVay way more than the general media sentiment.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
Willmark, Opoponax50, Goodtimes333
User avatar
ELCAraiderfan
GhostMad StorkBig Ben
Posts: 3,356
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 848 times
Received High Fives: 413 times

Unread post by ELCAraiderfan »

Bain is PISSED! Dude was hostile going down the walk from the green room, SNATCHING that buc hat. He's pissed off he didnt go before top 10.
User avatar
MexicanHulk
The AssassinThe Tooz
Posts: 2,145
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 514 times
Received High Fives: 220 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

16 to 88 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:36 pm Rams definitely have a need at WR so I'm guessing the plan was because this draft is so deep at that position they are gambling a guy they like will be there at 29.
This draft is not a good WR draft. It's overrated for sure. There's some solid talent later but, not deep for sure.
Post Reply