2026 Draft - First Round - Thurs.4/23 - 5/8 pm
- RunOverByHubbard
- Posts: 13,366
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
- Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
- Has given High Fives: 142 times
- Received High Fives: 754 times
2026 Draft - First Round - Thurs.4/23 - 5/8 pm
99% chance the Raiders start things off with doing what we all want them to do. Less than a 1% chance they trade the pick? Yep. There will be some interesting trades in the first round, including a possibility our new management trades up into the first round using the "extra" picks we have this year. But, I am expecting an evening of observing and anticipating rounds 2 & 3 tomorrow night.
Enjoy one of the best sports events of the year -- the NFL draft.
Enjoy one of the best sports events of the year -- the NFL draft.
- These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 3):
- Rabidraider, nitroraider, Sufferghost
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 19,187
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 422 times
- Received High Fives: 295 times
Alligator arms in more ways then one!
- These users gave a High Five to the author 16 to 88 for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
-
vtraider
- Posts: 8,221
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
- Has given High Fives: 46 times
- Received High Fives: 446 times
I couldn't understand a single word bain said
- These users gave a High Five to the author vtraider for the post (total 2):
- Rabidraider, Opoponax50
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,339
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 927 times
- Received High Fives: 2148 times
No. Not at QB. And not with an offensive mastermind making the pick.MexicanHulk wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:41 pm You can absolutely say that. Depends on how high a ceiling is & if you're ok with that. There's lots of variables
-
Jeevo
- Posts: 14,864
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
- Location: Canada
- Has given High Fives: 420 times
- Received High Fives: 791 times
Yeah you have to trust McVay no matter what he does. Still somewhat surprising that a team who wants to win a title next year uses 13 for a purpose beyond next year.chucker wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:42 pm I think it was ridiculous that Orlovsky rated Simpson higher than Mendoza but I'm not surprised Simpson went in that range. The Rams aren't going to pick that high very often so I think it's a solid move. I'll also trust McVay way more than the general media sentiment.
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 19,187
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 422 times
- Received High Fives: 295 times
To add to that, IF he turns out to be good how many teams in this draft are going to be kicking themselves for not taking him earlier or trading up to snag him.BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:37 pm You cant say you would of rather taken this qb or that qb later. If hes your guy, you take him. When will people realize you dont f[raiders_icon]ck around at QB.
-
Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,829
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1964 times
- Received High Fives: 1203 times
At least Pittsburgh doesn't get Simpson.
Since Rodgers is out doing mushrooms.
Since Rodgers is out doing mushrooms.
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,339
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 927 times
- Received High Fives: 2148 times
That's exactly what good teams with no major needs and an aging QB do. Not sure what's so surprising.Jeevo wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:46 pm Yeah you have to trust McVay no matter what he does. Still somewhat surprising that a team who wants to win a title next year uses 13 for a purpose beyond next year.
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,979
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1558 times
- Received High Fives: 1600 times
They are team, “f[raiders_icon]ck Them Picks”.Jeevo wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:46 pm Yeah you have to trust McVay no matter what he does. Still somewhat surprising that a team who wants to win a title next year uses 13 for a purpose beyond next year.
- pfish57
- Posts: 8,764
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
- Has given High Fives: 371 times
- Received High Fives: 860 times
Simpson was thrilled he didn't go to the Jets...now the Jets are stuck with the Sloth Geno starting all year lol
- These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post:
- ELCAraiderfan
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 19,187
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 422 times
- Received High Fives: 295 times
McVay walking a fine line here. Hoping he lands an impact player he needs (WR?) at 29 while preparing for the future. Was Stafford aware of this? lol.Jeevo wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:46 pm Yeah you have to trust McVay no matter what he does. Still somewhat surprising that a team who wants to win a title next year uses 13 for a purpose beyond next year.
-
Jeevo
- Posts: 14,864
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
- Location: Canada
- Has given High Fives: 420 times
- Received High Fives: 791 times
“Somewhat surprising”. And I’m far from alone in being a bit surprised that a team on the cusp doesn’t use 13 for the immediate future.BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:47 pm That's exactly what good teams with no major needs and an aging QB do. Not sure what's so surprising.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
- Rabidraider
- Raider_Dave
- Posts: 3,570
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
- Has given High Fives: 5 times
- Received High Fives: 244 times
16 picks to go, I'm already looking down the list of best available to see who's there at our pick maybe.
CB Hood
DT Banks
WR Conception
CB Hood
DT Banks
WR Conception
-
chucker
- Posts: 17,074
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 2100 times
- Received High Fives: 2811 times
I wouldn't be surprised to see them trade their first next year for a player. That player probably does a lot more in 2026 than a 2026 draft pick would. At some point they were going to need to find a successor to Stafford.Jeevo wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:46 pm Yeah you have to trust McVay no matter what he does. Still somewhat surprising that a team who wants to win a title next year uses 13 for a purpose beyond next year.
- Raider_Dave
- Posts: 3,570
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
- Has given High Fives: 5 times
- Received High Fives: 244 times
Report was they called Stafford before the pick to let him know.16 to 88 wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 6:50 pm McVay walking a fine line here. Hoping he lands an impact player he needs (WR?) at 29 while preparing for the future. Was Stafford aware of this? lol.
-
MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,145
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 514 times
- Received High Fives: 220 times
Damnit!! Banks gone. I figured McDonald, Concepcion, Boston &, C. Miller would be gone so, I wanted Banks bad