USA Today has the Raiders going 3-14
-
SuperRaider
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
- Location: Belper;UK
- Has given High Fives: 61 times
- Received High Fives: 198 times
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,339
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 928 times
- Received High Fives: 2149 times
Who gives a f*ck about USA Today. The fact that they have us as bad as last year's embarrassment when we upgraded basically everywhere shows their credibility.
-
tatalalicious
- Posts: 1,161
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:43 pm
- Has given High Fives: 78 times
- Received High Fives: 125 times
For the national media bad teams will continue to be bad until they are not, there's no real analysis in the article just guesses. This isnt the nfl from 20/30 years ago, there is always a few teams that emerge from the pack of last years bad teams. Not saying the Raiders will be one of them, I actually dont care what their record is just long as I see improvement.
- These users gave a High Five to the author tatalalicious for the post (total 3):
- chucker, raider_kin, raidersince63
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,339
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 928 times
- Received High Fives: 2149 times
It's lazy journalism. Anyone not expecting some sort of improvement, even record wise, is nuts. We play the Dolphins, Jets, Titans, Browns and Saints. All should be wins. And we are not going winless in our division. Its only happened twice in the last 20 years and this team is significantly better than those two Raider teams.tatalalicious wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 7:20 am For the national media bad teams will continue to be bad until they are not, there's no real analysis in the article just guesses. This isnt the nfl from 20/30 years ago, there is always a few teams that emerge from the pack of last years bad teams. Not saying the Raiders will be one of them, I actually dont care what their record is just long as I see improvement.
- These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 3):
- Opoponax50, powski, ALLRAIDERWORLD21
-
raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1232 times
-
Opoponax50
- Posts: 5,719
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
- Has given High Fives: 1150 times
- Received High Fives: 579 times
Whatever.
We suck until we don't, but the prediction of three wins means they didn't bother looking at some teams. They were probably out getting drunk and had to meet a deadline by the next morning.
We suck until we don't, but the prediction of three wins means they didn't bother looking at some teams. They were probably out getting drunk and had to meet a deadline by the next morning.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post (total 3):
- DrDUne, SuperRaider, Vercingetorix
-
Oaktownonly
- Posts: 3,731
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
- Has given High Fives: 447 times
- Received High Fives: 433 times
The team player wise has improved. The team coaching wise has improved dramatically. Three wins? GTFOH
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,195
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 781 times
- Received High Fives: 1031 times
id bet the writer any amount of money we win more then 3
- These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
- MexicanHulk
-
DeathStar24
- Posts: 1,103
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
- Location: PA
- Has given High Fives: 53 times
- Received High Fives: 179 times
In fairness everyone thought the Raiders would improve under Pete instead of McDaniels/Pierce.BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 3:32 am Who gives a f*ck about USA Today. The fact that they have us as bad as last year's embarrassment when we upgraded basically everywhere shows their credibility.
I don't expect 3 wins but they gotta prove it on the field.
- These users gave a High Five to the author DeathStar24 for the post (total 3):
- SkullCrusher, raidersince63, FLORIDARAYDAH
-
RunOverByHubbard
- Posts: 13,354
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
- Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
- Has given High Fives: 138 times
- Received High Fives: 756 times
-
SkullCrusher
- Posts: 12,018
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
- Location: The Nation.
- Has given High Fives: 486 times
- Received High Fives: 625 times
Strong chance everyone over-estimated last year.RunOverByHubbard wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 9:39 am Big deal. More predictions will emerge you won’t like.
-
MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,145
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 514 times
- Received High Fives: 219 times
Correct. It really doesn’t matter what they say. But, I wish I could bet them on that. I’d bet the house on it. Easy money lol (likely lol)BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 3:32 am Who gives a f*ck about USA Today. The fact that they have us as bad as last year's embarrassment when we upgraded basically everywhere shows their credibility.
- These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post (total 2):
- BoKnows81, Dr Death
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,339
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 928 times
- Received High Fives: 2149 times
Not everyone. Def not me. I hated the Pete signing bc it was clear that the game passed him by.DeathStar24 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 8:22 am In fairness everyone thought the Raiders would improve under Pete instead of McDaniels/Pierce.
I don't expect 3 wins but they gotta prove it on the field.
-
pfish57
- Posts: 8,729
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
- Has given High Fives: 356 times
- Received High Fives: 836 times
Don't you just hate when people lump you into the consensus train of thought on this forum lolBoKnows81 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 10:56 am Not everyone. Def not me. I hated the Pete signing bc it was clear that the game passed him by.