USA Today has the Raiders going 3-14

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 63 times
Received High Fives: 201 times

USA Today has the Raiders going 3-14

Unread post by SuperRaider »

User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 63 times
Received High Fives: 201 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

rich72 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 10:51 am As bad as our team was last season we could have won a couple more games if were werent tanking on purpose.
I really don’t think teams tank on purpose …..
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

SuperRaider wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 1:37 pm I really don’t think teams tank on purpose …..
When a team is as inept as the Raiders were last year it's hard to tell if it was on purpose or not. :loltears:

Regardless, the future looks much brighter after nabbing FM, adding new coaching, drafting and FAs.
User avatar
Sir Raider Duck, OMS
The AssassinFernandoJeanty
Posts: 10,545
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:58 pm
Location: The Principality of Sealand
Has given High Fives: 318 times
Received High Fives: 272 times

Unread post by Sir Raider Duck, OMS »

Remember that one of two things will happen:

1) We'll be better than 3-14 in which case nobody will remember this prediction except to laugh at it in retrospect, or

2) We actually do go 3-14, in which case this prediction will have been 100% accurate and there's nothing to be mad about.
These users gave a High Five to the author Sir Raider Duck, OMS for the post:
SuperRaider
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,765
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 373 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 7:29 pm Remember that one of two things will happen:

1) We'll be better than 3-14 in which case nobody will remember this prediction except to laugh at it in retrospect, or

2) We actually do go 3-14, in which case this prediction will have been 100% accurate and there's nothing to be mad about.
What if we are 4-13?
User avatar
Rick In Bakersfield
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 32 times
Received High Fives: 23 times

Unread post by Rick In Bakersfield »

USA Today doesn't know jackshit... :grin:
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,069
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 266 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

Maybe I’m in the minority here that is surprised that anyone’s surprised at a prediction like this.

For me, I wouldn’t put the chance of 3-14 at zero. I’d be surprised but not shocked. But I don’t think it’ll be fire everyone around here if we do. This is the highest I’ve been on our foundation in a long time… but we might not be there yet. That’s possible.

Assuming this off-season pays dividends this year in terms of looking like we got the QB, we got the coach, we’ve got some ascending talents on defen… even if we’re not great… I could see us being one more good offseason away from all aboard the hype train.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,744
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 230 times
Received High Fives: 514 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

I will be surprised unless it was the result of significant injury and Mendoza crashes out.
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,765
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 373 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

raiders93 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 9:10 pm Maybe I’m in the minority here that is surprised that anyone’s surprised at a prediction like this.

For me, I wouldn’t put the chance of 3-14 at zero. I’d be surprised but not shocked. But I don’t think it’ll be fire everyone around here if we do. This is the highest I’ve been on our foundation in a long time… but we might not be there yet. That’s possible.

Assuming this off-season pays dividends this year in terms of looking like we got the QB, we got the coach, we’ve got some ascending talents on defen… even if we’re not great… I could see us being one more good offseason away from all aboard the hype train.
I'll never be surprised at the depths that the Raiders can sink...just saying!
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 63 times
Received High Fives: 201 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

raidersince63 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 2:12 pm When a team is as inept as the Raiders were last year it's hard to tell if it was on purpose or not. :loltears:

Regardless, the future looks much brighter after nabbing FM, adding new coaching, drafting and FAs.
I just can’t see any team tanking on purpose as I think all HC,s go into the game to win….

Even if the Raiders go 3-14; they will be in a better place to go forward….their a wr that plays for Ohio state that supposedly is going to be great one….Raiders get him and that offense will be set for years…
These users gave a High Five to the author SuperRaider for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,765
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 373 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

SuperRaider wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2026 12:19 am I just can’t see any team tanking on purpose as I think all HC,s go into the game to win….

Even if the Raiders go 3-14; they will be in a better place to go forward….their a wr that plays for Ohio state that supposedly is going to be great one….Raiders get him and that offense will be set for years…
If we go 3-14 the world as you know it will cease to Exist lol
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 414 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

...did not like settling on Pete as a plan b, or c, or whatever it was, as starting over with a 70? year old seemed stupid, and like wasted time, and then when he had his kid coach the o line, and bringing in the chipster, who despite college success, has me skeptical of that hire....
....as it turns out, I grossly underestimated how bad chip would be, and with how confused and impotent that whole offense often looked, he basically stole that money....
These users gave a High Five to the author WNYRAIDER for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,659
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1240 times
Received High Fives: 2963 times

Unread post by Attyla »

We are getting our panties in a wad over an opinion piece?
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, ELCAraiderfan
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

SuperRaider wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2026 12:19 am I just can’t see any team tanking on purpose as I think all HC,s go into the game to win….

Even if the Raiders go 3-14; they will be in a better place to go forward….their a wr that plays for Ohio state that supposedly is going to be great one….Raiders get him and that offense will be set for years…
Oh, I don't think for one minute that we actually went into last year considering tanking, but after so many losses, it was obvious that hiring PC and his minions was a complete disaster, and that's when the powers that be may have started thinking that having the #1 pick the following year would pay dividends...and it appears that it did.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,862
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1156 times
Received High Fives: 1043 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Attyla wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2026 3:55 am We are getting our panties in a wad over an opinion piece?
Some are.
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,305
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4283 times
Received High Fives: 1119 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

pfish57 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2026 7:39 pm What if we are 4-13?
Improvement? :grin:
Post Reply