Around the NFL

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,463
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 880 times

Around the NFL

Post by LayneStaley »

No clue where to post some stuff not necessarily team related but could be? Feel free to delete if this belongs somewhere else.



Maxx and Parsons would be nasty. I probably wouldn’t pay the price though.
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,867
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 417 times
Received High Fives: 796 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

They should allow some sort of review on dpi. Not sure if it would be a challenge thing, or just in the last 2 minutes, or what, but calls that absolutely decide games are too important.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 3):
raiderboyron, chucker, rich72
User avatar
raiderboyron
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:44 am
Location: On the side of Lassen peak in beautiful Shasta Co
Has given High Fives: 365 times
Received High Fives: 183 times

Unread post by raiderboyron »

Jeevo wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:06 pm They should allow some sort of review on dpi. Not sure if it would be a challenge thing, or just in the last 2 minutes, or what, but calls that absolutely decide games are too important.
They did try but, as I recall, NO challenges were reversed. Hmmmm.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Jeevo wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:06 pm They should allow some sort of review on dpi. Not sure if it would be a challenge thing, or just in the last 2 minutes, or what, but calls that absolutely decide games are too important.
I wrote the other day for DPI to be overturned by a ref:

PI call on D, Defense Challenge: They defender would have to show zero contact once the ball is in the air, they'll use anything possible to keep that DPI and by the book that's all you need. (Ram's did have some contact)

PI not called, Offense Challenge: Either they have to 180 the above or each team would get a free PI call per game. Because it will be easy to find a pass where there is contact while the ball is in the air that isn't called.

How's 'bout the game made it this far and we just need to deal with it. Ram's shouldn't have blown the lead. Ram's now get to dig out of a hole, everyone's been there and done that.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,867
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 417 times
Received High Fives: 796 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

SkullCrusher wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:16 pm I wrote the other day for DPI to be overturned by a ref:

PI call on D, Defense Challenge: They defender would have to show of zero contact once the ball is in the air, they'll use anything possible to keep that DPI and by the book that's all you need. (Ram's did have some contact)

PI not called, Offense Challenge: Either they have to 180 the above or each team would get a free PI call per game. Because it will be easy to find a pass where there is contact while the ball is in the air that isn't called.

How's 'bout the game made it this far and we just need to deal with it. Ram's shouldn't have blown the lead. Ram's now get to dig out of a hole, everyone's been there and done that.
Absolutely, but certain calls are so bad and when they decide games it seems unfair I guess? Sure they blew the lead but they also held on and won anyway, if the call was made correctly that is. Besides the myriad of other eviewable plays hasn't runied the game. I looked it up after raiderboyron said it and they tried it in 2019 and 24 of 101 were overturned. It would only be on overturning calls and not on ones that wern't called. I realize it's a minefield but ...
User avatar
Oaktownonly
Posts: 3,754
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
Has given High Fives: 454 times
Received High Fives: 455 times

Unread post by Oaktownonly »

There is offensive and defensive holding on every play. It just depends on how much the refs will let them get away with. Some more than others. They will never do replay on flags for this reason.
User avatar
raiderboyron
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:44 am
Location: On the side of Lassen peak in beautiful Shasta Co
Has given High Fives: 365 times
Received High Fives: 183 times

Unread post by raiderboyron »

Jeevo wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:23 pm Absolutely but certain calls are so bad and when they decide games it seems unfair I guess? Sure they blew the lead but they also held on and won anyway, if the call was made correctly that is. Besides the myriad of other eviewable plays hasn't runied the game. I looked it up after raiderboyron said it and they tried it in 2019 and 24 of 101 were overturned. It would only be on overturning calls and not on ones that wern't called. I realize it's a minefield but ...
Thanks for clarification.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Jeevo wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:23 pm Absolutely, but certain calls are so bad and when they decide games it seems unfair I guess? Sure they blew the lead but they also held on and won anyway, if the call was made correctly that is. Besides the myriad of other eviewable plays hasn't runied the game. I looked it up after raiderboyron said it and they tried it in 2019 and 24 of 101 were overturned. It would only be on overturning calls and not on ones that wern't called. I realize it's a minefield but ...
Again we all made it this far, Ram's get to feel some pain, we've had for decades.

The problem with PI review, is it will become really B&W and the defender will have almost always illegally touched and they'll go with that to save face.

Totally not against reviewing this or anything else. I just feel I know how they'll operate.
Obviously then Unnecessary Roughness and holding should be on the docket then to.
Holding calls (called or missed) happen well more often than PI's.
User avatar
haji81872
Posts: 4,089
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:23 am
Has given High Fives: 98 times
Received High Fives: 341 times

Unread post by haji81872 »

It is a subjective call. Subjective calls need to be left alone.
These users gave a High Five to the author haji81872 for the post:
FLORIDARAYDAH
User avatar
Atlasffa
Posts: 13,148
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Just Win Baby!
Has given High Fives: 185 times
Received High Fives: 753 times

Unread post by Atlasffa »

SkullCrusher wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 11:50 am I'm sure they've been educated plenty, it's going to happen.
He still touched him, so on review they refs would have still gone by what they called.

The only thing I can come up with and it's more ratings!!!
Public Whacking, three to the butt on TV to the official that makes a bad call.

That's the only way for any satisfaction.
I found it interesting that the ref standing closest to the play, presumably with the best vision of the entire play, did not call the DPI. It was a ref further away who threw the flag.
These users gave a High Five to the author Atlasffa for the post:
raiderboyron
User avatar
raiderboyron
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:44 am
Location: On the side of Lassen peak in beautiful Shasta Co
Has given High Fives: 365 times
Received High Fives: 183 times

Unread post by raiderboyron »

Atlasffa wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:17 pm I found it interesting that the ref standing closest to the play, presumably with the best vision of the entire play, did not call the DPI. It was a ref further away who threw the flag.
That was my point exactly.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Atlasffa wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:17 pm I found it interesting that the ref standing closest to the play, presumably with the best vision of the entire play, did not call the DPI. It was a ref further away who threw the flag.
Interesting for sure, but this happens all the time in all sports.
Not always the closest ref is making the call for a variety of reasons.
There isn't any rules about who can or can't because they understand focus and angles play a big role.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
FLORIDARAYDAH
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 200 times
Received High Fives: 443 times

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »



Who knew?
User avatar
Amish Cabal
Posts: 2,360
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 11:19 am
Location: Behind enemy lines, KC
Has given High Fives: 82 times
Received High Fives: 92 times

Unread post by Amish Cabal »

Ravens have signed C Andre James to their practice squad. 🧐
User avatar
Oaktown Superman
Posts: 3,039
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
Has given High Fives: 549 times
Received High Fives: 197 times

Unread post by Oaktown Superman »

raiderboyron wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:10 pm They did try but, as I recall, NO challenges were reversed. Hmmmm.
Trayvon Mullen had one 86’d at KC from a coach’s challenge.
These users gave a High Five to the author Oaktown Superman for the post:
raiderboyron
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,284
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 1062 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

Amish Cabal wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2026 5:37 am Ravens have signed C Andre James to their practice squad. 🧐
and the raider paid that man a lot of bucks to be our starting center
Post Reply