He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,608
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 159 times
Received High Fives: 761 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,759
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 231 times
Received High Fives: 513 times

Post by Cruisin with Tooz »

LayneStaley wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 5:02 pm

IF this is true I’d be surprised we didn’t take 12/20 and the cap space and be done.
12 and next years first would be better than 12 and 20. The upside potential of next years first being a top 10 pick is worth taking the risk that they make the playoffs and that pick is in the 20s. Even when they do make the playoffs, they have typically been one and done. Next years class is also loaded with qbs, which might push other elite prospects lower in the 1st than would otherwise happen.
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,759
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 231 times
Received High Fives: 513 times

Post by Cruisin with Tooz »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 5:40 pm I saw what you did there...well played.
I assert my rights under the 5th amendment.
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,077
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 270 times

Post by raiders93 »

LayneStaley wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 6:26 pm Supposedly Cowboys already offered 12/20 this year but we want a player too. Not saying I believe it but if there’s truly a bidding war going on who knows.
I mean that seems like a pretty generous offer. If we get more, somebody better write Jerry a nice thank you card or something. He’s almost directly responsible for getting us Mendoza as is
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, LayneStaley
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,914
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 2035 times
Received High Fives: 1259 times

Post by Rabidraider »

raiders93 wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 7:37 pm I mean that seems like a pretty generous offer. If we get more, somebody better write Jerry a nice thank you card or something. He’s almost directly responsible for getting us Mendoza as is

12 and 20 would be outstanding.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
rich72
User avatar
STHfrontrow
Posts: 1,028
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 42 times
Received High Fives: 83 times

Post by STHfrontrow »

IF they get 12 and 20 they would be smart to package some kind of deal on one of these picks for a 1st next year with a retuning (2nd,3rd) pick this year.

That seems odd they would trade both those picks though.
These users gave a High Five to the author STHfrontrow for the post:
Raider Nation
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,878
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 413 times
Received High Fives: 793 times

Post by Jeevo »

I’d be shocked if Dallas traded both firsts for Crosby.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 3):
RI RAIDER, rich72, BoJacksonRules
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,731
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 42 times
Received High Fives: 1447 times

Post by DanKD »

If dallas offered that id immediately add the commissioners office on the line to announce the trade
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, RI RAIDER
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,077
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 270 times

Post by raiders93 »

Jeevo wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 7:45 pm I’d be shocked if Dallas traded both firsts for Crosby.
Agreed. If they’re sending us two, I’d think it’d be almost assumed one is a 2027 and perhaps the negotiating point is whether this years is the 12 or the 20.

Two 2026 1sts would, at least by draft value charts… actually represent them giving up more for Maxx than what they got for Micah. My understanding is that a future first is valued more comparable to a current 2nd.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,472
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 340 times
Received High Fives: 862 times

Post by LayneStaley »

#12/1st next year/Osa works for me.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Post by Goodtimes333 »

I refute the idea that Parsons is better than Crosby & thus compensation should be less. It's a shallow argument. Objectively speaking, from a big picture view Maxx Crosby is the better player. 1st down to 3rd down, 1st quarter to last quarter. Game 1 to 17 Maxx is the better player today. The age difference I give no f[raiders_icon]cks. Parsons has had two season ending injuries. Maxx has had none. It's two firsts and a good player or f[raiders_icon]ck off
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 4):
RunOverByHubbard, chucker, RI RAIDER, raider_kin
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,280
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 349 times
Received High Fives: 421 times

Post by WNYRAIDER »

...I don't want pickins'.....it has been said that he is consistent;y late, and that he has even shown up late on game day...
These users gave a High Five to the author WNYRAIDER for the post (total 3):
Dr Death, RI RAIDER, chucker
User avatar
Be_Easy_25
Posts: 5,573
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 134 times

Post by Be_Easy_25 »

I like that haul for Trent Duffie.

I’m good with two firsts plus from either.
Love you, Maxx.

Hope you have success individually but you win no rings with LAR and DAL because I will never pull for those teams to win.
User avatar
Be_Easy_25
Posts: 5,573
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 134 times

Post by Be_Easy_25 »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 11:02 pm I refute the idea that Parsons is better than Crosby & thus compensation should be less. It's a shallow argument. Objectively speaking, from a big picture view Maxx Crosby is the better player. 1st down to 3rd down, 1st quarter to last quarter. Game 1 to 17 Maxx is the better player today. The age difference I give no f[raiders_icon]cks. Parsons has had two season ending injuries. Maxx has had none. It's two firsts and a good player or f[raiders_icon]ck off
Maxx > Parsons.
These users gave a High Five to the author Be_Easy_25 for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,387
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1078 times
Received High Fives: 586 times

Post by RI RAIDER »

I think the Cowboys may already know they are getting Max. Why would they let a solid and versatile player like Hoffman go. We should be all over him. He can play center and both guard positions. Cowboy fans are bummed that he is gone.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Rick In Bakersfield
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 37 times
Received High Fives: 23 times

Post by Rick In Bakersfield »

I would do it for the 12 & 20 picks!
Post Reply