Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)
-
RaiderandBulldog
- Posts: 16,359
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
- Location: Fresno Ca
- Has given High Fives: 200 times
- Received High Fives: 444 times
-
GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,980
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1559 times
- Received High Fives: 1601 times
[quote=352Raider post_id=1054155]Quarterback ratings
How this works: This forecast is based on 50,000 simulations of the season and updates after every game. Our traditional model uses Elo ratings (a measure of strength based on head-to-head results and quality of opponent) to calculate teams’ chances of winning their regular-season games and advancing to and through the playoffs. Our quarterback-adjusted Elo model incorporates news reports to project likely starters for every upcoming game and uses our quarterback Elo ratings to adjust win probabilities for those games. A team’s current quarterback adjustment is based on its likely starter in its next game and how much better or worse that QB is than the team’s top starter. Full methodology »
Game metrics are on a 0-100 scale. Quality is determined by the harmonic mean of the teams’ Elo ratings; importance measures how much the result will alter playoff projections; the overall number is the average of the quality and importance values.
Factoring in Russell Wilson on the Broncos now, Carr is definitely the #4 QB in the division at this point.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20 ... rterbacks/[/quote]Not in the least bit surprised to see Minshew all of 1 point below our golden boy shit-stain at about 1/10th the cost. That’s BEFORE some terrible f[raiders_icon]cked-up franchise-ruining contract extension.
How this works: This forecast is based on 50,000 simulations of the season and updates after every game. Our traditional model uses Elo ratings (a measure of strength based on head-to-head results and quality of opponent) to calculate teams’ chances of winning their regular-season games and advancing to and through the playoffs. Our quarterback-adjusted Elo model incorporates news reports to project likely starters for every upcoming game and uses our quarterback Elo ratings to adjust win probabilities for those games. A team’s current quarterback adjustment is based on its likely starter in its next game and how much better or worse that QB is than the team’s top starter. Full methodology »
Game metrics are on a 0-100 scale. Quality is determined by the harmonic mean of the teams’ Elo ratings; importance measures how much the result will alter playoff projections; the overall number is the average of the quality and importance values.
Factoring in Russell Wilson on the Broncos now, Carr is definitely the #4 QB in the division at this point.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20 ... rterbacks/[/quote]Not in the least bit surprised to see Minshew all of 1 point below our golden boy shit-stain at about 1/10th the cost. That’s BEFORE some terrible f[raiders_icon]cked-up franchise-ruining contract extension.
-
GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,980
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1559 times
- Received High Fives: 1601 times
[quote=352Raider post_id=1054197]Trubisky is 22 points higher than Carr at far less money 
[/quote]And just got signed by the Steelers. Damn.
[/quote]And just got signed by the Steelers. Damn.
-
NoClapsPlease
- Posts: 9,470
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:11 pm
- Has given High Fives: 24 times
- Received High Fives: 147 times
Need adams, chark and jackson tbh.
Do all 3.
Do all 3.
-
Opoponax50
- Posts: 5,729
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
- Has given High Fives: 1170 times
- Received High Fives: 595 times
[quote=352Raider post_id=1054197]Trubisky is 22 points higher than Carr at far less money [/quote]I'd rather have Carr than Trubisky, without a doubt.
That said, if we're talking $35-$40 million, I want a QB that's up where Herbert is rated on that chart. If not, then a cheap Trubisky would be better.
It's all about point production and making plays. If we can the same production and playmaking for 1/8 the cost, that's what we should do until we can find a true playmaker at the position.
[/quote]I'd rather have Carr than Trubisky, without a doubt. That said, if we're talking $35-$40 million, I want a QB that's up where Herbert is rated on that chart. If not, then a cheap Trubisky would be better.
It's all about point production and making plays. If we can the same production and playmaking for 1/8 the cost, that's what we should do until we can find a true playmaker at the position.
-
NoThanksSir
- Posts: 8,447
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Has given High Fives: 462 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
[quote=NoClapsPlease post_id=1054245]Need adams, chark and jackson tbh.
Do all 3.[/quote]How? You're talking close to $70 mill in cap needed to sign all 3.
Do all 3.[/quote]How? You're talking close to $70 mill in cap needed to sign all 3.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,657
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1239 times
- Received High Fives: 2963 times
[quote=NoThanksSir post_id=1054312]How? You're talking close to $70 mill in cap needed to sign all 3.[/quote]Adams alone would be tough on our cap
-
NoThanksSir
- Posts: 8,447
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Has given High Fives: 462 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
[quote=352Raider post_id=1054318]This isn't Madden 22[/quote]For real. That comment puts into perspective those with the opinion that Carr just needs a better supporting cast in order to succeed. Sure, if we could go 40 million over the cap then just maybe we could hide Carr's deficiencies.
-
live.B.A.raida
- Posts: 5,461
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:12 am
- Location: Oakland, born and raised
Carr needs all pros all over the roster so he can win.
-
CWood24
- Posts: 4,042
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
- Has given High Fives: 9 times
- Received High Fives: 354 times
If Carr is indeed the QB for the new regime then they need to tell him if he really wants Adams then needs to take the Brady discount & sign for 20 mil , Adams & Carr for 40 sounds about right although i think Adams is a little overrated
Adams would be a waste of money you could draft a WR & sign a couple of vet for that money & spread the production which would make you far better
Adams would be a waste of money you could draft a WR & sign a couple of vet for that money & spread the production which would make you far better
-
GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,980
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1559 times
- Received High Fives: 1601 times
[quote=Opoponax50 post_id=1054309]I'd rather have Carr than Trubisky, without a doubt.
That said, if we're talking $35-$40 million, I want a QB that's up where Herbert is rated on that chart. If not, then a cheap Trubisky would be better.
It's all about point production and making plays. If we can the same production and playmaking for 1/8 the cost, that's what we should do until we can find a true playmaker at the position.[/quote]I would definitely have preferred Trubisky. Much cheaper, and he has something Carr hasn’t had in years. The possibility of something more.
Tru signed a 2 year contract. Steelers are set up to make a run at QB in the ‘23 draft if it doesn’t work out. No muss. No fuss.
Here we are heading into another “Season at Bernies” with a comatose franchise due to a code-blue quarterback.
That said, if we're talking $35-$40 million, I want a QB that's up where Herbert is rated on that chart. If not, then a cheap Trubisky would be better.
It's all about point production and making plays. If we can the same production and playmaking for 1/8 the cost, that's what we should do until we can find a true playmaker at the position.[/quote]I would definitely have preferred Trubisky. Much cheaper, and he has something Carr hasn’t had in years. The possibility of something more.
Tru signed a 2 year contract. Steelers are set up to make a run at QB in the ‘23 draft if it doesn’t work out. No muss. No fuss.
Here we are heading into another “Season at Bernies” with a comatose franchise due to a code-blue quarterback.