And with the 14th pick the Raiders select…..

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,462
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 878 times
Received High Fives: 1735 times

And with the 14th pick the Raiders select…..

Unread post by Xramfan »

Discuss…..
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 413 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

Rabidraider wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:41 am Loane is considered a blue chip can't miss guard who could go earlier than 14. If he's there you draft him and make him the left guard for the next 10 years. Must protect Mendoza's blind side.

...i'm not so familiar, but many who suggest they are ,seem to think he might not be a fit for what we supposedly want to do with more zone?
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,861
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1155 times
Received High Fives: 1039 times

Unread post by Willmark »

On our offense a true super star diva WR1 might not end up being a need this year. So maybe they are eying Ioane.

Think is from what I’ve been reading? Looks like he doesn’t make it out of the top 10.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,687
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 41 times
Received High Fives: 1422 times

Unread post by DanKD »

I dont actually think Ioane will even be there
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 413 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

DanKD wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:44 am I was impressed with Rogers and I think Spytek mentioned hes been at the facilities all offseason training. I see RT as our biggest need on the line right now.

Not opposed to grabbing a guard especially in mid rounds but I could see Rogers and JPJ being solid at the guard spots.

I agree we need rt, unless they see something in what we have that we couldn't see with Pete's kid and the chipster offense making everyone look worse, but we also can not over look lt, at least quality depth wise, as Miller just can't seem to hold up for more than half a season at this point..... ...whole lot of maybes on the o line....
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 413 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

DanKD wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:44 am I was impressed with Rogers and I think Spytek mentioned hes been at the facilities all offseason training. I see RT as our biggest need on the line right now.

Not opposed to grabbing a guard especially in mid rounds but I could see Rogers and JPJ being solid at the guard spots.

....outside of center now, Rogers might be our best bet at feeling like one of the other o line positions may be 'solved' . quality and durability wise.
User avatar
haji81872
Posts: 4,089
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:23 am
Has given High Fives: 98 times
Received High Fives: 341 times

Unread post by haji81872 »

If Downs somehow fell, you have to take him.

If we trade back and Mansoor Delane or Dillon Thineman are there, I would say they same.

Otherwise Monroe Freeling really feels right.
These users gave a High Five to the author haji81872 for the post:
BoJacksonRules
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,747
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 626 times
Received High Fives: 1053 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Rabidraider wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:41 am Loane is considered a blue chip can't miss guard who could go earlier than 14. If he's there you draft him and make him the left guard for the next 10 years. Must protect Mendoza's blind side.
And if he doesn't fit the scheme Kubiak wants to run? You still taking him and forcing a square peg in a round hole like the last 2-3 coaching staffs did?
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,861
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1155 times
Received High Fives: 1039 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Rogers and Grant were like 97 and 98 last year so just inside the Top 100. With another year under his belt Roger’s could be the answer and who knows, maybe Grant takes over at RT.

The biggest take away is we can slide JPJ back to RG.
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,836
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1967 times
Received High Fives: 1215 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Hellbound wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 12:18 pm And if he doesn't fit the scheme Kubiak wants to run? You still taking him and forcing a square peg in a round hole like the last 2-3 coaching staffs did?
Well if we draft him, then you know Kubiak is good with the pick.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Willmark wrote: Sun Mar 08, 2026 5:01 pm He also talked about it several documentaries. One was in the Vince Lombardi: A Football Life where Madden went to a seminar on coaching and Lombardi talked for eight hours. About

The Packers Sweep.

4 hours, break for lunch. 4 Hours, finished.

On single play for eight hours.

Madden walked out thinking. "I don't know a damn thing."
But Madden did know a few things and the Packer Sweep vanished into history.
Lombardi was the dinosaur who thought he has one system and that can't be stopped. That's always wrong.
Lomb loved him some Lomb.
Ok I'm guessing, but that is a common mindset for many and for that time.
Al eventually fell to the same ideals.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 413 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

Willmark wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 12:21 pm Rogers and Grant were like 97 and 98 last year so just inside the Top 100. With another year under his belt Roger’s could be the answer and who knows, maybe Grant takes over at RT.

The biggest take away is we can slide JPJ back to RG.

...I just keep going back to thinking that we need a good tackle, whether through a high draft picks, or free agency, and the draft picks seems like the more likely chance to get that, all current things (fa market included) considered.... ...in as much as they wanted to make the big splash at center, that does nothing to undue the huge question,marks we have with miller the blind side making it through a year, or the even bigger questions marks at the right tackle position.
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,368
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 758 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Given our signings today, Monday, I am thinking that the draft pick at 14 should focus on: OT, G, and S. Of course, BPA (see Brock Bowers), but if all things are pretty equal, we still need a new tackle (replace Glaze and eventually Miller) and a good safety for sure. As far as guard is concerned, I do not have enough information on our young guys drafted last year, but, we all love Ioane of Penn State.
User avatar
BotesBoats
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 45 times
Received High Fives: 99 times

Unread post by BotesBoats »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 3:33 pm Given our signings today, Monday, I am thinking that the draft pick at 14 should focus on: OT, G, and S. Of course, BPA (see Brock Bowers), but if all things are pretty equal, we still need a new tackle (replace Glaze and eventually Miller) and a good safety for sure. As far as guard is concerned, I do not have enough information on our young guys drafted last year, but, we all love Ioane of Penn State.
I don't like trading up, but this year specifically I think Caleb Downs is the best player in the draft. And if he slips out of the top 5-7, I wouldn't mind making a big trade up to get him. He's almost a sure of a thing as it gets, and could be an anchor at the S position for a decade.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 3:33 pm Given our signings today, Monday, I am thinking that the draft pick at 14 should focus on: OT, G, and S. Of course, BPA (see Brock Bowers), but if all things are pretty equal, we still need a new tackle (replace Glaze and eventually Miller) and a good safety for sure. As far as guard is concerned, I do not have enough information on our young guys drafted last year, but, we all live Ioane of Penn State.
Yeah still G/T at 14, remove all doubt. D in the 2nd.
I'm still a BPA for position of need guy, unless something completely unplanned happens with a draft player.
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,368
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 758 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

As I mentioned in some other post, if one of the two linebackers falls to us at 14 I would love it. This is especially true because we are apparently switching to a 3-4 and both those linebackers are big enough to play some run as well as are agile pass defenders . But at this point both are mocked drafted to go pretty high.
Post Reply