2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderFan1
Posts: 1,568
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:30 am
Has given High Fives: 143 times
Received High Fives: 116 times

2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)

Post by RaiderFan1 »

Obvious Mendoza #1 no consideration of trading that pick.
But who you got picks 2 - 4 thats going to help Mendoza.

#2 Raiders should be able to select WR Chris Bell or WR KC Concepcion with our early 2nd.

#3 I forget who it was, but someone here mentioned that the best pure dominant RT coming out of college could be got in the 3rd. And stated hes played his whole career at RT, and not being moved around the line.

Sounds like solid gets

Id hope the rest of the draft is building the trenches, with maybe 1 DB in there

Who else you like ?
User avatar
BoJacksonRules
Posts: 2,690
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
Has given High Fives: 339 times
Received High Fives: 158 times

Unread post by BoJacksonRules »

Pregnon is way more likely to be there at pick 2.36 than Miller. Those that think Miller may be available at pick 3.67 need to visit a few more draft sites and change which player evaluators you listen to.
User avatar
HesterLayes
Posts: 6,241
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 34 times
Received High Fives: 253 times

Unread post by HesterLayes »

BoKnows81 wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 5:29 pm It's talked about plenty. I think FS is as big a need as NT. But I don't care how bad our CBs are, I'm not taking a n2nd or 3rd round undersized CB in the top 15 of the 1st round. Those days are long gone.
Hardly anyone is talking corners…and what do you mean top 15 of the first?

Anyway..a solid CB at 36 would work for me
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,377
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2721 times
Received High Fives: 1183 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 3:59 pm If he wasn’t such a goober, I’d think he was making such a shit mock on purpose. Hondo’s dogshit mock 9.0.

https://www.si.com/nfl/raiders/onsi/las ... eye-talent
Yep, that's pretty bad.
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,377
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2721 times
Received High Fives: 1183 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

BoKnows81 wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 4:32 pm Ponds? In what world is he worth the #14 pick?
He means Ponds at 36
User avatar
Tusken
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed May 18, 2022 11:13 am
Location: NC
Has given High Fives: 11 times
Received High Fives: 23 times

Unread post by Tusken »

1st round- Mendoza
2nd round-Freeling
3rd round-Dunker

I know not the coolest as it were to pick OL back to back but last year's OL put me in therapy and it needs to be done to protect Mendoza.
These users gave a High Five to the author Tusken for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,603
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 626 times
Received High Fives: 550 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

Excellent zone blocking scheme linemen are found all over the place, often times in latter rounds. Look at the 49ers oline. Can you name any of them outside of Trent Williams? Rick Dennison and Kubiak know what they need there. I have every confidence they know what they're doing when it comes to the line. If there's a oline dude you really want and they're on the board at any point just keep in mind they may not fit what Klint needs. It baffles me how many fans can't comprehend scheme fit
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 2):
GoodTimeCharlie, chucker
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,072
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 267 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

HesterLayes wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 5:32 pm Hardly anyone is talking corners…and what do you mean top 15 of the first?

Anyway..a solid CB at 36 would work for me
I’m generally not a big fan of taking corners early imo. Seems like one of the lowest hit rates of any position and scheme fit is such a huge part. It also seems to be a position that degrades rapidly - I’d say being not far behind RB in terms of effective lifespan.

You get the truly elite prospects (Ramsey, Surtain, etc…) that are worth it, but short of that I’m more of the mindset: you’re gonna lose on CB a lot more than you win so lose small and just aim for scheme fits in the mid rounds. Passrush can cover up a lot too.
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post (total 3):
BoKnows81, dred, Goodtimes333
User avatar
Sold My Soul
Posts: 17,845
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: Somewhere In Time
Has given High Fives: 171 times
Received High Fives: 408 times

Unread post by Sold My Soul »

Klint Kubiak and the Raiders sit second in free-agency spending. Sharing a division with the Chiefs, Chargers and Broncos makes a playoff appearance unlikely, but the expected pick of Fernando Mendoza, some savvy signings and the presumed return of an angry Maxx Crosby mean Vegas could be much improved.


The Titans, Giants or Raiders in the postseason? Could happen, actually.
User avatar
Spurs Raider
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:05 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 41 times

Unread post by Spurs Raider »

Tusken wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 6:11 pm 1st round- Mendoza
2nd round-Freeling
3rd round-Dunker

I know not the coolest as it were to pick OL back to back but last year's OL put me in therapy and it needs to be done to protect Mendoza.
Freeling's definitely going in the 1st so for OT we'll likely be looking at Lomu/Miller I suspect and even then they might have gone.

If your scenario panned out then we'd have catapulted ourselves into having one of the best O-lines in the league.
These users gave a High Five to the author Spurs Raider for the post:
BoJacksonRules
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,086
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2123 times
Received High Fives: 2830 times

Unread post by chucker »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 6:38 pm Excellent zone blocking scheme linemen are found all over the place, often times in latter rounds. Look at the 49ers oline. Can you name any of them outside of Trent Williams? Rick Dennison and Kubiak know what they need there. I have every confidence they know what they're doing when it comes to the line. If there's a oline dude you really want and they're on the board at any point just keep in mind they may not fit what Klint needs. It baffles me how many fans can't comprehend scheme fit
I think we are all impressed with the big names and the most powerful olinemen, as they flash in highlights. But you're right that we have to think about scheme fit - especially in the move to a ZBS. By the way, Trent Williams was a 4th rounder.

Dunker is a guy who keeps getting talked about - it's also been discussed that he's just not a ZBS fit. I don't claim to be an expert, but I wouldn't expect anyone who's not a ZBS fit to get drafted by the Raiders.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,086
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2123 times
Received High Fives: 2830 times

Unread post by chucker »

CWood24 wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 10:06 am So we want to draft a 2nd round RT to start when we have a 3rd round RT on the roster who we could develop & start i like the idea of competition but we have holes to fill

Since when did 3rd round picks mean nothing, people around here told me that 3rd round picks should be starting.

Grant & Rogers did enough for me at the end of the season for the starting gig to be theirs to lose, if Grant really is your LT of the future then getting him reps at RT would Be invaluable to his development

Taking QB out the mix then NT is THE biggest need on this roster & after that it is FS

People are underestimating just how important a good NT is to a 3-4 D & also that if the opportunity to get a good dynamic NT like Hunter, Corleone, Orange or MacDonald (if he drops) presents itself you take it

Again it all depends how the draft cards fall & who drops
Honestly the only "need" to me that matters in 2026 is a need to give Mendoza a chance. We need to get the best players on the roster and I'd be happy to add a tackle if that's the best guy on the board. Grant might be the guy, and obviously Kubiak and Dennison know a lot more about that than I do. I also think you never ruin your team by drafting olinemen. If we aren't set for the future at NT or safety, we can still develop our young QB. If there's a great NT or safety prospect, then draft him. But get some insurance at RT as well, which could be in the draft, FA, or trade.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 5):
Jeevo, Goodtimes333, Opoponax50, NoThanksSir, Raiders Baby
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,689
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1236 times
Received High Fives: 2986 times

Unread post by Attyla »

chucker wrote: Tue Mar 17, 2026 5:43 am Honestly the only "need" to me that matters in 2026 is a need to give Mendoza a chance. We need to get the best players on the roster and I'd be happy to add a tackle if that's the best guy on the board. Grant might be the guy, and obviously Kubiak and Dennison know a lot more about that than I do. I also think you never ruin your team by drafting olinemen. If we aren't set for the future at NT or safety, we can still develop our young QB. If there's a great NT or safety prospect, then draft him. But get some insurance at RT as well, which could be in the draft, FA, or trade.
I have no problem if we go need on day 2 over "best player available" with the intent to protect Mendoza and we end up with a tackle and a guard.
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,868
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 417 times
Received High Fives: 794 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Yup, Rome wasn’t built in a day. We don’t need to plug every positional hole this off season, we do need to give Mendoza the best possible chance to succeed.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 3):
BoJacksonRules, Goodtimes333, NoThanksSir
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,043
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 356 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

chucker wrote: Tue Mar 17, 2026 5:43 am Honestly the only "need" to me that matters in 2026 is a need to give Mendoza a chance. We need to get the best players on the roster and I'd be happy to add a tackle if that's the best guy on the board. Grant might be the guy, and obviously Kubiak and Dennison know a lot more about that than I do. I also think you never ruin your team by drafting olinemen. If we aren't set for the future at NT or safety, we can still develop our young QB. If there's a great NT or safety prospect, then draft him. But get some insurance at RT as well, which could be in the draft, FA, or trade.
I have no issue with going OL but i do think the D is a good NT away from atleast being solid which will help Mendoza just as much

I also look at IOL & think those 4th round picks could yield a potential starter or at least some depth at OG a guy like Beau Stephens has some real potential to work in a Kubiak ran offence

If we go tackle in the 2nd then Max Iheanachor looks like the perfect fit for Kubiak, a big monster with great movement ability which would work perfectly in Kubiak’s zone scheme

1st Fernando Mendoza QB
2nd Max Iheanachor RT
3rd Donrtay Corleone NT

If it went this way i’d be happy, i did want Jacob Rodriguez in the 2nd but with the way we attacked LB in FA i wouldn't complain about OT there even though i did want a vet RT

Caleb Banks is an intriguing prospect with his broken foot there are talks of him being there day 3, i know it is a foot injury but throwing one of those 4th at the potential of getting a monster 3-4 DE
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, Goodtimes333
Post Reply