Concern over Taron Johnson?

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 928 times
Received High Fives: 2149 times

Concern over Taron Johnson?

Post by BoKnows81 »

User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,229
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 794 times
Received High Fives: 1043 times

Post by mstrbass2000 »

vlog,blog,podcast,social media reporting r way more influential than traditional media these days...all kinds of news have been broken by and proven true by alternative media over the lying national media complex "which basically parrots each other"
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
Raider Nation
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,134
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 508 times
Received High Fives: 660 times

Post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun May 10, 2026 8:38 am Me tonight on account of this harrowing Taron Johnson news…

Image
Honestly, considering previous years sideshows, tragedies, and turmoil, if this is the only concerning news this off season or regular season, I will take it as a blessing.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,670
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 665 times
Received High Fives: 359 times

Post by rich72 »

if its 18 million for 2 years, just make it incentive based where he can even earn more than that if he plays well enough.
These users gave a High Five to the author rich72 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,042
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Post by CWood24 »

So it is basically just the norm

Player gets traded, said player has no guaranteed money, he want’s some security built in & holds out of voluntary camp whilst deal gets reworked
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1216 times
Received High Fives: 2922 times

Post by Attyla »

CWood24 wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 12:45 am So it is basically just the norm

Player gets traded, said player has no guaranteed money, he want’s some security built in & holds out of voluntary camp whilst deal gets reworked
Agents are doing their job so I am not concerned at all
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,070
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2085 times
Received High Fives: 2802 times

Post by chucker »

If you've traded for a player then you're expecting him to make the roster - just guarantee a chunk of the 2026 money and leave 2027 alone. I don't love that he's not participating yet, but it's not a big deal. I guess you could also adjust the 2027 contract so that a guarantee vests after a certain date in the 2027 offseason.

I can understand a player not wanting to go through an offseason program without knowing if he'll just get cut for cap reasons before the season.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 2):
FLORIDARAYDAH, rich72
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Post by raidersince63 »

chucker wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 5:52 am If you've traded for a player then you're expecting him to make the roster - just guarantee a chunk of the 2026 money and leave 2027 alone. I don't love that he's not participating yet, but it's not a big deal. I guess you could also adjust the 2027 contract so that a guarantee vests after a certain date in the 2027 offseason.

I can understand a player not wanting to go through an offseason program without knowing if he'll just get cut for cap reasons before the season.
I know we'd love to have everyone but part of the reason he has not reported yet is because it's not required.

I'd like to see his deal structured mostly based on his performance this year with hopes of motivating him to play his ass off this year. Maybe something like $3MIL guaranteed this year and if he hits his benchmarks, $5Mil+ guaranteed kicks in next year.

I don't spend much time pouring over contracts so my idea may be completely out of line.
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,806
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 808 times
Received High Fives: 966 times

Post by Viper »

raidersince63 wrote: Sun May 10, 2026 9:06 am "We don't know what we don't know".
Ya but in my case more often than not, it’s I should’ve known
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 928 times
Received High Fives: 2149 times

Post by BoKnows81 »

The people that use the "its only voluntary" excuse are likely the same ones that believe in participation trophies. Taron Johnson isnt a superstar nor is he guaranteed a new deal. He should be there.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
BoJacksonRules, Opoponax50
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,070
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2085 times
Received High Fives: 2802 times

Post by chucker »

raidersince63 wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 6:16 am I know we'd love to have everyone but part of the reason he has not reported yet is because it's not required.

I'd like to see his deal structured mostly based on his performance this year with hopes of motivating him to play his ass off this year. Maybe something like $3MIL guaranteed this year and if he hits his benchmarks, $5Mil+ guaranteed kicks in next year.

I don't spend much time pouring over contracts so my idea may be completely out of line.
I don't think there's a need to guarantee anything in 2027 based on benchmarks. And his presence is not required, but we definitely want it when we're installing a new defense with a new DC and teammates he's unfamiliar with. The voluntary OTA's are not really "voluntary". If you want to put yourself in a position to be a starter, you should find a way to get your ass in there well before things become contractually mandatory.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 2):
BoKnows81, raidersince63
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,269
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 341 times
Received High Fives: 410 times

Post by WNYRAIDER »

Rabidraider wrote: Sun May 10, 2026 12:56 pm But it does not change the fact that the media (real or fan based) needs to make content, even if there is no substance to the article.

Johnson is considered a great pickup. Buffalo hated losing him, but the cap forced their hand.

I'll bet 10k Silver dollars Johnson makes the team.

I am in bills country and i've seen plenty, and was happy we got him, as I had said elsewhere here at the time. ....i'm just not worried about any reading too much into the tea leaves stuff above....
These users gave a High Five to the author WNYRAIDER for the post (total 2):
Hellbound, Willmark
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Post by raidersince63 »

chucker wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 7:06 am I don't think there's a need to guarantee anything in 2027 based on benchmarks. And his presence is not required, but we definitely want it when we're installing a new defense with a new DC and teammates he's unfamiliar with. The voluntary OTA's are not really "voluntary". If you want to put yourself in a position to be a starter, you should find a way to get your ass in there well before things become contractually mandatory.
I was just going on the assumption that Johnson will likely be an instant starter...but point taken.
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Post by raidersince63 »

And yes, it is voluntary and it's not an excuse, it's a fact and I'm not at all concerned that he's not in camp yet. And no one said anything about trophies or being guaranteed a new contract. We are in an era when players renegotiate all the time so it's certainly not a big deal.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,229
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 794 times
Received High Fives: 1043 times

Post by mstrbass2000 »

Attyla wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 4:15 am Agents are doing their job so I am not concerned at all
agree 100 pct ...i do wonder how much leverage taron and his agent actually thinks they have ??? we drafted cbs that can play in that spot
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,229
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 794 times
Received High Fives: 1043 times

Post by mstrbass2000 »

18 million over 2 yrs is very cheap contract, cb is a PREMIUM position and the slot position is now getting pushed higher as the league see much value in the position

the raider own his rights and can trade him off at the trade deadline if the youngsters play well and get back a good pick in return
Post Reply