Vita Vea Requests a Trade

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Be_Easy_25
Posts: 5,560
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 127 times

Vita Vea Requests a Trade

Unread post by Be_Easy_25 »

Should we pursue him?
What’s his trade value?
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 10:10 am The Raiders were a nut hair away from beating the Bears last year, even with that horrifically coached Raiders team. That basically tells you all you need to know
That's always a funny game to play, we beat down the Chiefs on Christmas and they won the SB weeks later.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
heavyD
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

That's one extreme way to look at it. The fact of the matter is that the Raiders have some talent. You lose Kolton Miller for almost the whole year. Bowers gets hurt week 1 and isn't right for weeks on end. The defense is constantly on the field and also put in terrible situations with turnovers from terrible QB play. There's aspects of the team that were dog shit, including and above all coaching from the top. There's also aspects of the team that were very solid. It's lazy and cheap to look at it without depth or in an extreme light.
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,365
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2715 times
Received High Fives: 1189 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

After reading the posts here (yes I read other peoples posts) I am warming to the idea of trading for Vea. A 4th and a 6th, and what does he want for a contract? If he wants 3 yrs 30/yr guaranteed, is that too much?
Not sure now, maybe its not.
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,835
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1965 times
Received High Fives: 1212 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

rich72 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:37 am Yeah he apparently "tweaked" his back. I would for sure pass on him now. Back injuries linger.
Its a contract ploy more than likely.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2148 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

rich72 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:37 am Yeah he apparently "tweaked" his back. I would for sure pass on him now. Back injuries linger.
Lol bro, he's not hurt.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
Goodtimes333, Viper
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Doubt he'd accept it, but considering his age I'm thinking a Raider friendly contract offer for Vita for 3 years @ $20 Mil per with a 4th year team option for another $20 Mil. Not sure what the guaranteed money would/should be.

Offer TB a 4th and a 6th, stipulated on the Raiders and Vita agreeing on the above figures.

Anything more than this is overpaying/over-extending, IMO, though I realize that teams are sometimes compelled to do so.


...just spitballing.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Opoponax50
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,164
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 999 times
Received High Fives: 619 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 12:51 pm Doubt he'd accept it, but considering his age I'm thinking a Raider friendly contract offer for Vita for 3 years @ $20 Mil per with a 4th year team option for another $20 Mil. Not sure what the guaranteed money would/should be.

Offer TB a 4th and a 6th, stipulated on the Raiders and Vita agreeing on the above figures.

Anything more than this is overpaying/over-extending, IMO, though I realize that teams are sometimes compelled to do so.


...just spitballing.
If he would sign for anything close to that he would have been locked up by Tampa.
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,164
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 999 times
Received High Fives: 619 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 12:51 pm Doubt he'd accept it, but considering his age I'm thinking a Raider friendly contract offer for Vita for 3 years @ $20 Mil per with a 4th year team option for another $20 Mil. Not sure what the guaranteed money would/should be.

Offer TB a 4th and a 6th, stipulated on the Raiders and Vita agreeing on the above figures.

Anything more than this is overpaying/over-extending, IMO, though I realize that teams are sometimes compelled to do so.


...just spitballing.
If he would sign for anything close to that he would have been locked up by Tampa.
These users gave a High Five to the author FLORIDARAYDAH for the post:
raidersince63
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,747
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 626 times
Received High Fives: 1052 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

rich72 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:37 am Yeah he apparently "tweaked" his back. I would for sure pass on him now. Back injuries linger.
AKA we might be closing in on a trade partner, so we're holding him out for the near future
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,644
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1236 times
Received High Fives: 2960 times

Unread post by Attyla »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 1:28 pm If he would sign for anything close to that he would have been locked up by Tampa.
Excellent point, he is requesting a trade because he is looking for more than a slimmed down third tier contract.
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,042
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

Rabidraider wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 12:12 pm Its a contract ploy more than likely.
I’d wager that the Bucs sat him to protect themselves should they looked to trade him if they don't work out a contract

I’m getting on board with trading for him as it could be the thing that really jumpstart the team
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
tatalalicious
Posts: 1,163
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:43 pm
Has given High Fives: 78 times
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by tatalalicious »

heavyD wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 5:51 am He's 31 years old. His timeline doesn't really fit the Raiders. If he was a free agent that's one thing as they can afford to overpay him a bit but they also have to give up a 2nd or 3rd round pick. It's not a great fit for both parties as I'm sure he will get opportunities to join teams that are in a win-now window.
I dont think this team needs to wait to be good to add quality starters on the o-line or at the dt position. Those positions are anchors and are fundamental to the offence and defenses success, unlike WR or RBs. To me its only about the cost of the acquisition.
These users gave a High Five to the author tatalalicious for the post (total 4):
Goodtimes333, Raiders Baby, Rabidraider, Opoponax50
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

The glaring weakness on defense is lack of a nose tackle/inside presence. Yeah, let's not trade for the guy because the team "isn't good yet"

Crazy mindset to have. This Raider team isn't that far off from competing week in week out. The fact of pure shit QB play the last few years is the number #1 reason of struggle. Shanahan/Kubiak scheme with a proven oline coach gives a lot of hope. The QB room has some options. The defense has added a lot of talent. There's plenty to work with to not be a bottom feeder. If you can get a Vita Vea you do it. It's the one hole on defense. (Every team has depth issues all over. Very few don't)
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 4):
Lecomp, Raiders Baby, BoKnows81, Opoponax50
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,021
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 487 times
Received High Fives: 627 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

raider_kin wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:57 am After reading the posts here (yes I read other peoples posts) I am warming to the idea of trading for Vea. A 4th and a 6th, and what does he want for a contract? If he wants 3 yrs 30/yr guaranteed, is that too much?
Not sure now, maybe its not.
For those numbers I'd be hot for. Imo Buc's and Vita won't do those numbers, not even close.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 1:28 pm If he would sign for anything close to that he would have been locked up by Tampa.
Yup, like I said, I doubt he or TB would go for that anyway, which again, is why I think the whole thing is moot.
Post Reply