Is it Mendoza time???

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 373 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Is it Mendoza time???

Unread post by pfish57 »

We are on a 4 game losing skid, and I think it's time to put KC out to pasture...with that said all this talk of Mendoza getting destroyed is ridiculous...hell KC has somehow come out unscathed after 7 games what makes people think a mobile QB will fare worse...we aren't going anywhere with KC! It's time to get the kid some real game time experience & see what life with Mendoza entails!
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post:
RI RAIDER
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,462
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 877 times
Received High Fives: 1735 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

erickench wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:06 pm We can't start a rookie QB without a good run game to support him.
Where in the Book O` Rules is that? Section 3 Article 5? ;)
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,570
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 244 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

erickench wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:06 pm We can't start a rookie QB without a good run game to support him.
So you are ok letting him ride the bench for 3 or 4 more years if needed to fix the run game. We can give him a contract extension without ever having played.
These users gave a High Five to the author Raider_Dave for the post:
Attyla
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,644
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2960 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Xramfan wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:12 pm Where in the Book O` Rules is that? Section 3 Article 5? ;)
We make shit up all the time

We have great TEs, and even if the run game is not up to snuff, his ability to throw bullets downfield would soften up the defenses we face especially once teams learn that he has pretty damn good pocket awareness even if he is still processing what he is seeing a bit slow.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,644
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2960 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Raider_Dave wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:12 pm So you are ok letting him ride the bench for 3 or 4 more years if needed to fix the run game. We can give him a contract extension without ever having played.
I love how some seem to think we are going to ruin him unless we get it perfect before he hits the field.
User avatar
Mckdaddy
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 2:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 20 times
Received High Fives: 18 times

Unread post by Mckdaddy »

After the bye would be a great time for Mendo to start.Couple weeks of first team reps.He needs playing time to see nfl speed and get some experience.Cant wait for the perfect scenario
These users gave a High Five to the author Mckdaddy for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, Willmark
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,743
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 230 times
Received High Fives: 514 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Mckdaddy wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:25 pm After the bye would be a great time for Mendo to start.Couple weeks of first team reps.He needs playing time to see nfl speed and get some experience.Cant wait for the perfect scenario
The bye is way too late. We need to take advantage of the market and get trade comp for Cousins. A 2nd round pick could fix a guard position.
User avatar
Mckdaddy
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 2:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 20 times
Received High Fives: 18 times

Unread post by Mckdaddy »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:32 pm The bye is way too late. We need to take advantage of the market and get trade comp for Cousins. A 2nd round pick could fix a guard position.
As much as I agree I don't see anyway getting a 2nd for Cousins.Hes playing well but hes in a familiar scheme.Weak arm and no mobility aint going to cut it
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 298 times
Received High Fives: 61 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

I’ve been seeing a lot of comments about Cousins having no mobility. It’s a valid point especially when he plays behind this struggling oline.

But you know who else is old and has no mobility? The qb we just faced. Stafford is coming off an MVP season. He has a running game and star wide receivers.

I’m sure that someone would counter that Stafford has a stronger arm. But it makes me wonder how things would look if in a hypothetical scenario, Stafford was a Raider and Cousins was on the Rams.

And if Cousins stats look great with us, what would his stats be if he started for the Rams?

This post is not an attack on Mendoza and I think it’s a reasonable position to have that he should start. Someone could use my comments to argue that Mendoza should start because our talent is so inferior to teams like the Rams so throw the rookie in there to develop him since we’re not contenders anyway. Others have said don’t throw Mendoza in there with so many players on offense struggling.
These users gave a High Five to the author Steve007 for the post (total 2):
Willmark, Owsley Stanley
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,164
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 1003 times
Received High Fives: 619 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

erickench wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:06 pm We can't start a rookie QB without a good run game to support him.
Yes we can. No reason not too. QB is getting tome to pass. A stronger arm back there should help get the run game going a little better.
Should we sit him a few years until everything is perfect? He would be stepping into a better situation than most rookie do. He was the #1 pick not a developmental project. I think he has the tools let's see what he has got
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,729
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1169 times
Received High Fives: 595 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

Coach dd 11 wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2026 11:17 am Jesus...I didn't compare him to DC....I said that he could get hurt or mentally break constantly playing behind a piss poor line like DC did in my opinion, and a lot of others.
Carr was always mentally weak. It had nothing to do with any O-line, RB, WR, or TE issues. If things were imperfect, there could've been a picture in the dictionary of him next to "Mediocre."

Contrast that with Stafford who played his ass off with the Lions. That was a terrible team but the guy went out every week and gave it his all.

If Mendoza is as mentally vaginal as Carr was, he's hopeless anyway.

I don't think he is though. I think this kid can take the hard knocks and get better. He'll learn from his mistakes and continue to develop his talent.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post:
Rainman56
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,109
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 767 times
Received High Fives: 1190 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

erickench wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:06 pm We can't start a rookie QB without a good run game to support him.
In today's era rookie QB's can thrive out of the gate. It's not like Mendoza played in the triple option at Nebraska. He was developed in a pro style offense. He has the instincts.

As others have alluded he may open things up for the running game because he has the ability to stretch the field and utilize intermediate crosses and outs better than Cousins. He is also a threat to run the ball himself.
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post:
FLORIDARAYDAH
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,109
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 767 times
Received High Fives: 1190 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Opoponax50 wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 3:04 pm Carr was always mentally weak. It had nothing to do with any O-line, RB, WR, or TE issues. If things were imperfect, there could've been a picture in the dictionary of him next to "Mediocre."

Contrast that with Stafford who played his ass off with the Lions. That was a terrible team but the guy went out every week and gave it his all.

If Mendoza is as mentally vaginal as Carr was, he's hopeless anyway.

I don't think he is though. I think this kid can take the hard knocks and get better. He'll learn from his mistakes and continue to develop his talent.
Not a chance.
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,729
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1169 times
Received High Fives: 595 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

Hellbound wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 3:00 am He needs to scrap some of his game day calling plan too. Sometimes you need to adjust things
Yeah. Handing off to Jeanty up the middle on 1st down is like starting each drive with 2nd and 10 instead of 1st and ten.

Maybe there's talk behind the scenes about how the O-line is getting better (?) or something. But from both the eye test and the stats, it's ass right now. A coach wants to stick with their philosophy and that's fine, but after seven games, you need to be a little more flexible.
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,861
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1155 times
Received High Fives: 1037 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Opoponax50 wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 3:14 pm Yeah. Handing off to Jeanty up the middle on 1st down is like starting each drive with 2nd and 10 instead of 1st and ten.
Its maddening that we open every game and then nearly every offensive series with a run up the middle.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post (total 2):
FLORIDARAYDAH, Diesis
User avatar
Rainman56
Posts: 12,552
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:28 pm
Location: Underground
Has given High Fives: 548 times
Received High Fives: 367 times

Unread post by Rainman56 »

Xramfan wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 12:12 pm Where in the Book O` Rules is that? Section 3 Article 5? ;)
:rofl:
Post Reply